Skip to main content
Log in

Financing Security Through Elite Taxation: The Case of Colombia's “Democratic Security Taxes”

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Governments across the developing world in general, and Latin America in particular, tend to have difficulty in raising taxes among elites. Beginning in 2002, however, the Colombian government adopted a series of wealth taxes among the wealthiest taxpayers. Revenue from the tax was earmarked for security expenditures and represented about 1 % of GDP. Drawing on elite interviews, surveys, government documents, and media sources, this article studies the factors behind the adoption of the tax. It finds that three main factors make the elite tax possible, namely the combination of fiscal and security crises, cohesion among business and government elites, and improving perceptions of the government's provision of public safety. The findings should inform efforts in the developing world, where low levels of fiscal extraction, deteriorating security conditions, and mounting public safety expenditures are common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Brazil's tax revenue/GDP in the mid to upper 20s is an exception in the region.

  2. The tax continued during President Santos's administration.

  3. A detailed account of failed attempts at taxing elites is not included because of space considerations, but for a discussion of a dozen attempts since 1974, see Urrutia 1989; Harberger 2002; Olivera, Pachón, and Perry 2010.

  4. All dollar figures are nominal and were converted using the average yearly representative exchange rate figures from Colombia's Central Bank (Banco de la República).

  5. I.e., gross assets minus debt. The calculation of wealth included real estate, vehicles, cattle, ranches, banks accounts, factories, plants, and equipment.

  6. The calculation of wealth excluded the first COP$200 million (US$117,000) of main residence (home or apartment), as well as the net value of stock in domestic companies.

  7. A famous example was the FARC's Law 002 (Rettberg 2002).

  8. The Supreme Court ruled the bonds to be retroactive and therefore unconstitutional.

  9. For a discussion of the prevalence of tax evasion in Latin America, see Bergman 2009.

  10. However, the memory of the crisis in subsequent years likely served as a benchmark for evaluations of public safety.

  11. On business' influence in Congress see Revista Dinero 2011a.

  12. Two of Uribe's cabinet members, who asked not to be identified, provided this account separately in personal interviews.

  13. The approval was controversial because the president convened an extraordinary session of Congress while many legislators were away for winter holiday recess.

  14. Decree 4825 of Dec. 29, 2010. The Constitutional Court upheld the measure on April 4, 2011.

  15. The only exception is social programs.

  16. Federation of Cattle-Ranchers (FEDEGAN); Colombian Agricultural Association (SAC); Colombian Insurers Federation (FASECOLDA); and the Colombian Association of Electricity Generators (ACOLGEN).

  17. This contrast is also appreciated in El Salvador where business was unwilling to cooperate with President José Napoleon Duarte's peace efforts (1984–1989) but threw its support behind President Alfredo Cristiani (1989–1994) (Rettberg 2007).

References

  • Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales, 2011. Ingresos tributarios recaudados por tipo de impuesto administrado por la DIAN, 1970–2011, June.

  • Álvarez S, Rettberg A 2008. “Cuantificando los efectos económicos del conflicto,” Colombia Internacional 67 (January–June).

  • Bergman M. 2009. Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin America: The Political Culture of Cheating and Compliance in Argentina and Chile. Penn State University Press.

  • Bird R. Tax reform in Latin America: a review of some recent experiences. Lat Am Res Rev. 1992;27:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botero, JH. 2005. Op-ed “Enemigo,” El Tiempo, July 20.

  • Brautigam D. Introduction. In: Brautigam D, Fjeldstad OH, Moore M, editors. Taxation and State Building in Developing Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castro M, Wartenberg J, Celis A. El conflicto armado: La estrategia económica de los distintos actores y su incidencia en los costos de la violencia, 1990–1998. Planeación y Desarrollo. 1999;30:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno MA. Blood and War and the Nation State in Latin America. Debt: Penn State University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavijo, B, Morero L. 2010. “Elecciones Presidenciales en Colombia 2010.” Instituto de Ciencia Política Hernán Echavarría Olózaga,” June.

  • Colprensa. 2009. “48 Empresas libres del impuesto al patrimonio,” December 11.

  • Corrales, J. 1997–98. “Do Economic Crises Contribute to Economic Reform? Argentina and Venezuela in the 1990s,” Political Science Quarterly 112, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Congreso G 2003. Issue 572. “Proyecto de Ley 155 de 2003,” November 6.

  • del Congreso Gaceta 2006. Issue 527, “Proyecto de Ley 39 de 2006,” November 9.

  • Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2003. “Cifras de Justicia 1996–2002,” Documento de la Dirección de Justicia y Seguridad, Bogotá.

  • Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2007. Documento CONPES 3460, Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social, February.

  • Diario Oficial. 2002. Issue 44897, “Decreto 1837 de 2002, por el cual se declara el estado de conmoción interior,” August 11.

  • Diario Oficial. 2003. Issue 45,415, “Ley 863 de 2003, Por la cual se establecen normas tributarias, aduaneras, fiscales y de control para estimular el crecimiento económico y el saneamiento de las finanzas públicas,” December 29.

  • Diario Oficial. 2005. Issue 45,963, “Ley 963 o de Estabilidad Jurídica,” July 8.

  • Diaro Oficial. 2002a. Issue 44,897, “Decreto 1838 de 2002, por el cual se crea un impuesto especial para preservar la Seguridad Democrática,” August 11.

  • Drazen A, Grilli V. The benefits of crisis for economic reforms. Am Econ Rev. 1993;83:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Tiempo. 1999. “Paz sí, pero sin Victor G y sin canje,” October 24.

  • El Tiempo. 2002a. “Debate por Bonos de Guerra,” July 23.

  • El Tiempo. 2002b. “Cautela por inversion en Bonos,” July 23.

  • El Tiempo. 2003a. “No a reforma tributaria,” July 24.

  • El Tiempo. 2003b. “Reforma política o ajuste fiscal,” January 12.

  • El Tiempo. 2003c. “Corte tumbó IVA del 2 por ciento,” September 10.

  • El Tiempo. 2003d. “Malestar de Uribe por lo aprobado de la reforma tributaria en el Congreso,” December 11.

  • El Tiempo. 2003e. “Soplan vientos de más reformas,” December 30.

  • Fairfield T. Business power and tax reform: taxing income and profits in Chile and Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society. 2010;52:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield, T 2011. “The Political Economy of Piñera’s 2010 Tax Increases,” unpublished ms.

  • Fairfield T. Going where the money is: strategies for taxing economic elites in unequal democracies. World Dev. 2013;47:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E 1996. Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Glaser M, Bartley Hildreth W. 1999. “Service Delivery Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay Taxes: Citizen Recognition of Local Government Performance,” Public Productivity and Management Review 23, 1 (September).

  • Green, D, Kahneman D, Kunreuther H 1994. “How the Scope and Method of Public Funding Affect Willingness to Pay for Public Goods,” Public Opinion Quarterly 58.

  • Harberger, A 2002. Observations on Tax Reform in Colombia. Unpublished Ms. University of California at Los Angeles. August 2002.

  • Hart A. Death of the partisan? Globalization and taxation in South America, 1990–2006. Comparative Political Studies. 2010;43:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugaard, L Isacson A, Johnson J. 2011. A Cautionary Tale: Plan Colombia's Lessons for U.S. Policy Toward Mexico and Beyond, Washington Office on Latin America, November.

  • Hensher, D, Shore N, Train K. 2005. “Households’ Willingness to Pay for Water Service Attributes,” Environmental and Resource Economics 32.

  • International Monetary Fund. 2011. Revenue Mobilization in Developing Countries. Report Prepared by the Fiscal Affairs Department, March

  • Jan H, Palda F. Quality of government services and the civic duty to pay taxes in the Czech and Slovak Republics and other transition countries. Kyklos. 2004;57:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R ,Stalling B. 1991. “The Political Economy of Latin American Populism,” in The Macroeconomics of Populism, Rudiger Dornbusch and Sebastian Edwards (eds.) NBER.

  • Lafaurie J. El pensamiento económico y social de Fedegan 2008–2010. Bogotá: FEDEGAN; 2010.

  • Lieberman E. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon Jr., J. 2004. “Causes of Tax Reform in Latin America, 1977–1995,” Latin American Research Review 39, 1 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Defensa Nacional. 2008. “Metodologia para el cálculo de gasto en defensa y seguridad,” Serie de Prospectiva, Documento #1, Bogotá, Colombia.

  • Ministerio de Defensa Nacional. 2009. “Gasto en Defensa y Seguridad 1998–2011,” Serie de Prospectiva, Estudio #2, January.

  • Moore, M. 2007. “How Does Taxation Affect the Quality of Governance?” IDS Working Paper 280.

  • Olivera, M, Pachón M, Guillermo P. 2010. The Political Economy of Fiscal Reform: The Case of Colombia, 1986–2006. Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper IDB-WP-181 (May).

  • Prichard, W. 2009. “The Politics of Taxation and Implications for Accountability in Ghana,” IDS Working Paper 330.

  • Prichard, W, Hassan M. 2012. “The Political Economy of Tax Reform: A Simple Analytical Framework Applied to Bangladesh,” unpublished ms. University of Toronto.

  • Restrepo, L A. 2006. “Los Arduos dilemas de la democracia en Colombia,” in IEPRI, ed., Nuestra guerra sin nombre: transformaciones del conflicto en Colombia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, IEPRI.

  • Rettberg, A. 2002. “Administrando la adversidad: respuestas empresariales al conflicto colombiano,” Colombia Internacional 55 (Mayo-Agosto).

  • Rettberg, A. 2004. “Business-Led Peacebuilding in Colombia: Fad or Future of a Country in Crisis?” LSE Crisis Programme Working Paper 56.

  • Rettberg, A. 2005. “Business vs. Business? Grupos and Organized Business in Colombia,” Latin American Politics and Society 47, 1 (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettberg A. The private sector and peace in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Colombia. J Lat Am Stud. 2007;39:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revista D. 2011a. “Los reyes del lobby,” August 18.

  • Revista D. 2011b. “Impuesto al patrimonio: estrategia de persuasión,” June 14.

  • Romero M. Democratización política y contrarreforma paramilitar en Colombia. Política y Sociedad. 2002;39:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, O. 2006. “Tax system reform in Latin America: Domestic and International Causes,” Review of International Political Economy 13, 5 (December).

  • Schneider BR. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze-Kraft, Markus forthcoming. “La cuestión militar en Colombia: la fuerza pública y los retos de la construcción de la paz,” in Angelika Rettberg, ed., La construcción de la paz en Colombia, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá.

  • Simonsen B, RobbinsM D. 2003. “Reasonableness, Satisfaction, andWillingness to Pay Property Taxes,” Urban Affairs Review 38, 3 (July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater D. cc. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sociedad de Agricultores Colombianos (SAC). 2011. Encuesta de Opinión de Empresarios Agropecuarios, 46th stage, May.

  • The Economist. 1999. “Few Friends Left for Colombia’s Peace Talks,” December 14.

  • Timmons J. Taxation and credible commitment: left, right, and partisan turnover. Comparative Politics. 2010;42:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia, M 1989. “The Politics of Fiscal Policy in Colombia,” in Miguel Urrutia et al. (eds.) The Political Economy of Fiscal Policy, United Nations University.

  • Vargas A , García V. 2008. “Seguridad ciudadana y gasto público: reflexiones sobre el caso colombiano,” America Latina Hoy 50.

  • Weyland, K. 1996. “Risk-taking in Latin American Economic Restructuring,” International Studies Quarterly 40.

  • Weyland K. Growth with equity in Chile's new democracy? Lat Am Res Rev. 1997;32:1.

    Google Scholar 

Author’s Interviews

  • Anonymous member of Uribe’s cabinet. 2011. June.

  • Anonymous president of management consulting firm. 2011. June.

  • Barco, Carolina. 2010. Minister of Foreign Affairs and Ambassador to the United States under Uribe, November.

  • Borja, Wilson. 2011. Representative serving in the Economic Committee, Polo Democrático, June.

  • Buendía, Paola. 2010. Director for Planning and Security at the National Planning Department, March.

  • Castro, Santiago. 2010. Representative serving in the Economic Committee, Conservative Party, March 26.

  • García, Juliana. 2010. Deputy Director for Planning and Security at the National Planning Department, March.

  • Gavíria, Simón. 2011. Representative serving in the Economic Committee, Liberal Party, June.

  • Giha, Yaneth. 2011. Deputy Defense Minister for Foreign Affairs and former Director of Defense Budgets at the National Planning Department, June.

  • Jaramillo, Sergio. 2010. Former Vice-minister of Defense and special adviser to President Santos, March.

  • Jiménez, Fernando. 2010. Director General for the Budget, Ministry of Finance, March.

  • Junguito, Roberto. 2012. Former Minister of Finance and head of Colombia’s Insurers Federation, April.

  • Llorente, María Victoria. 2010. Director of the NGO Fundación Ideas Para la Paz, March.

  • López, Claudia. 2010. Journalist who contributed to unveil the “parapolitics” scandal, April.

  • Mejía, Rafael. 2011. Vice-President of the Consejo Gremial and President of the Colombian Agricultural Society, June.

  • Ortega, Juan Ricardo. 2011. Former Deputy Minister of Finance and head of the DIAN under President Santos, June.

  • Ortiz, Rutty. 2010. Deputy Director for the Budget, Ministry of Finance. March.

  • Pinzón, Juan Carlos. 2011. Former Deputy Minister of Defense under President Uribe and Minister of Defense under Santos, June.

  • Posada, Augusto. 2010. Representative serving in the Economic Committee, Partido de la U, March.

  • Ramírez, Martha Lucía. 2010. President Uribe’s first Defense Minister, March.

  • Vargas, Mauricio. 2010. Budget Director at the Ministry of Defense, March.

  • Vélez, María Zulema. 2011. President of the Colombian Association of Electricity Generators (ACOLGEN), June 14.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to John Bailey, Fredy Barrero, Marcelo Bergman, Jorge Domínguez, Tasha Fairfield, Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, Frances Hagopian, Oliver Kaplan, Sarah Kreps, Steven Levitsky, Claudia López, James Mahon, Jr., Mick Moore, Gabriel Ondetti, Wilson Prichard, Angelika Rettberg, Omar Sanchez, Aaron Schneider, Ben Ross Schneider, Markus Schultze-Kraft, and anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions. I would like to acknowledge the International Center for Taxation and Development (ICTD) for financial support to conduct this research, and the many Colombians that generously shared their views. Earlier versions were presented at Harvard’s Tuesday Seminar of Latin American Politics and the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, and as ICTD Working Paper #3. All errors remain my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo A. Flores-Macías.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flores-Macías, G.A. Financing Security Through Elite Taxation: The Case of Colombia's “Democratic Security Taxes”. St Comp Int Dev 49, 477–500 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9146-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9146-7

Keywords

Navigation