Skip to main content
Log in

Confronting Coup Risk in the Latin American Left

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Military coups d'état have become dramatically less frequent in Latin America over the past 20 years, leading many analysts to conclude that the risk of coups in the region today is negligible. Yet we observe that a particular subset of presidents in the region—namely, those commonly associated with the radical left—pursue a wide range of “coup-proofing” behaviors, primarily in the way that they manage relations with their militaries, but also in their political rhetoric. Our goal in this article is to explain why some Latin American presidents spend precious resources on coup-proofing. First, even as we demonstrate that coup activity is significantly diminished across the region as a whole, we offer evidence to suggest that coup risk is quite real in countries with radical left presidents. Second, we identify several specific strategies that these presidents have pursued to minimize coup risk. We explain the coup-proofing rationale behind each of these strategies and document their use in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador. Third, we show that no similar set of strategies or policies has been pursued by moderate leftist or more conservative presidents in the region. We infer from these empirical patterns that radical left presidents have undertaken substantial efforts to maintain military allegiance and to mitigate coup risk precisely because they recognize the possibility of military intervention. In our conclusion, we suggest that these strategies may confer a short-term benefit for the presidents who implement them, but they are likely to have negative consequences for the long-term stability of democratic institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the purposes of this paper, we define Latin America to include the 17 major continental republics as well as Cuba, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic; we do not discuss the English-speaking Caribbean or Caribbean microstates.

  2. There is strong consensus in the literature regarding the distinction between the moderate and radical left in Latin America. We concur with Kurt Weyland’s definition of the radical left (which he calls the “contestatory” left): “the moderate current tempers its pursuit of leftist goals prudently, respecting economic constraints and political opposition…By contrast, the more radical wing challenges neoliberalism, defies strictures of globalization, and attacks the political opposition” (see Weyland (2010, 3)).

  3. Coup incidence and coup risk are conceptually distinct. The former refers to an actual event, and is directly observable. The latter is an abstract concept that is not directly observable; coup risk therefore must be estimated or inferred from available evidence. See for example Belkin and Schofer (2003, 595) and Fitch (1998, xv).

  4. The most recent Latin American event recorded as a successful coup in this dataset is Fujimori’s “autogolpe” in Peru in 1992. The codebook lists Gutiérrez’s ouster in Ecuador (2005) and Zelaya’s in Honduras (2009) as cases of “resignation of executive due to poor performance/loss of authority,” thus explicitly excluding them from the set of coups. Presently, we discuss the possibility that these cases are miscoded.

  5. As late as May 2011, several Latin American countries had still refused to recognize the Lobo government and Honduras was only readmitted into the OAS in June of that year.

  6. We consider Nicaragua and Paraguay to be marginal cases that might also be fruitfully considered part of the radical left. But policy making under Daniel Ortega is more erratic, and Paraguay’s President Lugo was constrained by his dependence on centrist coalition partners, making the status of these cases more ambiguous. Neither our definition of the “radical left” nor our classification of cases should be controversial, as the literature on this point has reached a high level of consensus. See Weyland (2010, 3). See also Castañeda (2006), Cleary (2006), Flores-Macías (2010), and Madrid (2010).

  7. For the first two incidents, see Valenzuela (2004); on the third incident, Pion-Berlin and Trinkunas (2010) suggest that the military facilitated Gutiérrez’s fall from power by declining to intervene against a massive protest movement.

  8. Data are not available for Costa Rica, Haiti, and Panama. We calculate 5-year averages to smooth over the relatively high variability across years but the pattern evident in the table is robust to other methods of comparison. And as we discuss below, the pattern is even stronger when we look at individual cases, to trace the timing of spending increases relative to the presidential accessions of Chávez, Morales, and Correa.

  9. On September 30, 2010, members of the Ecuadorian police and military demonstrated against a “law that would reduce their benefits and slow salary increases.” Correa confronted the demonstrators in person, found himself in physical danger, and escaped to a police hospital. He was rescued by the military that evening. See Romero (2010c).

  10. These military reforms are rooted in a clause from the 1999 constitution that cleared the path for political advocacy within the military. See Brewer-Carias 2010, 130–133.

  11. James translates the slogan as “Socialist homeland or death! We will be victorious!”

  12. These terms can be translated as “coup-plotter,” “counter-revolutionaries,” “fascists,” “the bourgeoisie,” “the oligarchy,” “destabilizers,” “the secessionist movement,” and “assassins.”

  13. The transcripts for Aló Presidente can be retrieved at http://www.alopresidente.gob.ve/Multimedia/20. While there have been over 350 episodes of this program broadcast between 1999 and 2010, as of this writing, only 286 episode transcripts are available. Chávez’s blog is accessible from this site: http://www.minci.gob.ve/lineas-de-Chávez/82.

  14. As of this writing, the Copper Reserve Law had not been rescinded. But on May 16, 2011, President Piñera signed a bill to rescind the law (and reform military budgeting procedures) and submitted it to the congress. All major parties in congress support the general principle of rescinding the law. See La Tercera (Chile) (2011).

  15. Lehman (2007). The prospect of irregular officer rotation only emerged when senior officers threatened to resign in response to Lula’s efforts to uncover past abuses committed during the military regime. See The Economist (2010a).

  16. Kirchner won 22 % in the first round of the presidential election, which put him slightly behind fellow Peronist Carlos Menem’s 25 %. Faced with deep unpopularity and devastating poll numbers, Menem withdrew from the second round runoff 4 days prior to the election. Kirchner was then designated as president elect (see Levitsky and Murillo (2003, 157–60)). For a discussion of Kirchner’s human rights agenda upon taking office, see Diamint (2008, 107–109).

  17. Centeno (2002) and Desch (1999) explain why low external threat and domestic politicization creates challenges for civilian control of the military.

  18. Quinlivan suggests that political socialization would in fact be an invitation for a coup and thus a misguided form of coup-proofing. He emphasizes the benefits that accrue to leaders when they attain what Huntington (1957) describes as “objective civilian control.” Such control prevents coups by maintaining a “professional,” i.e., apolitical, officer corps that dwells on battlefield effectiveness, not domestic politics, and that appreciates the “military risks involved in a coup attempt” (1999, 151–153). Chávez and Morales have sought “subjective civilian control” instead, aiming to turn their militaries into accessories of their political movements. As a result, future administrations that follow a different political course could find themselves alienated from their militaries.

References

  • Agence France Presse. Uribe fires four top Colombian generals. April 27, 2005.

  • Agence France Presse. Bolivian opposition organizing ‘civil coup’: president. September 5, 2008.

  • Arceneaux CL, Pion-Berlin D. Issues, threats, and institutions: explaining OAS responses to democratic dilemmas in Latin America. Latin American Politics Society. 2007;49(2):1–31. Summer.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, Oscar. Fuel for a coup: the perils of Latin America’s oversized militaries. Washington Post. July 9, 2009.

  • Arostegui, Martin. Evo Morales: a new security command in Bolivia. Washington Times. January 31, 2006a.

  • Arostegui, Martin. Bolivia plans border bases; Venezuela aids effort to oppose a ‘scheming’ U.S. Washington Times. September 19, 2006b.

  • Arostegui, Martin. Cuban advisers bolster Venezuelan regime. Washington Times. April 6, 2010.

  • Avilés W. Global capitalism, democracy, and civil–military relations in Colombia. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avilés W. Despite insurgency: reducing military prerogatives in Colombia and Peru. Latin American Politics Society. 2009;51(1):57–85. Spring.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajak, Frank. Venezuelan military: election arbiter and wild card. Associated Press. October 5, 2012.

  • BBC News. Bolivian army adopts Cuban slogan, March 24, 2010.

  • Belkin A, Schofer E. Toward a structural understanding of coup risk. J Confl Resolut. 2003;47(5):594–620. October.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Walden. Commentary. Business World, February 28, 2006.

  • Brewer-Carias AR. Dismantling democracy in Venezuela. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 130–3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, Hugh and Alexandra Valencia. Unrest rocks Ecuador, Correa blames coup attempt. Reuters. September 30, 2010.

  • Castañeda J. Latin America’s left turn. Foreign Affairs. 2006;85:28–43. May–June.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centeno MA. Blood and debt: war and the nation-state in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania Press University; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuquimia, Marco. Morales to make early replacements in armed forces to avoid internal conflicts. El Deber. January 6, 2009.

  • Cleary M. A “Left Turn” in Latin America? Explaining the Left’s Resurgence. J Democr. 2006; 17(4):35–49. October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desch MC. Civilian control of the military. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamint R. La historia sin fin: el control civil de los militares en Argentina. Nueva Sociedad. 2008;213:95–111. January-February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez J, Purcell SK. Political evolution in the hemisphere. In: Fishlow A, Jones J, editors. The United States and the Americas: a twenty-first century view. New York: Norton; 1999. p. 137–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, Andrew. Is Latin America heading for an arms race? Christian Science Monitor, January 16, 2008.

  • Economist. Don’t Look Back; Lula and the Generals. January 9, 2010a.

  • Economist. A strike against democracy: the president survives an uprising by security forces. October 7, 2010b.

  • Economist. A Caribbean Tripoli? Hugo Chávez grooms a militia. April 7, 2011a.

  • Economist. Doing the Conga: the president takes on the protesters, December 10, 2011b.

  • El Espectador. Colombian government must learn lessons from FARC attack in Huila (editorial). February 29, 2004.

  • El Universal. High-ranking officer's remarks cast doubt on the true role of the army. November 9, 2010.

  • El Universo. Correa trusts in two former Lucio Gutiérrez classmates. April 17, 2010.

  • Feaver P. Armed servants: agency, oversight, and civil–military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer S. The man on horseback: the role of the military in politics. London: Pall Mall Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch SJ. The armed forces and democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Macías G. Statist vs pro-market: explaining leftist governments’ economic policies in Latin America. Comparative Politics. 2010;42(4):413–33. July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossum E. Factors influencing the occurrence of military coups d'etat in Latin America. J Peace Res. 1967;4(3):228–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco Alonso Juan. ‘No coupsters or tyrants anymore’ in the Venezuelan army. El Universal. August 8, 2011.

  • Gardner Simon. Bolivia army patrols town under martial law. Reuters. September 14, 2008.

  • Guardian. Ecuador’s president promises to punish his enemies after day of chaos, October 1, 2010.

  • Hakim P. Dispirited politics. J Democr. 2003;14(2):108–22. April.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Housego Kim. New military commanders named in Colombia. Associated Press. November 18, 2003.

  • Huntington SP. The soldier and the state: the theory and politics of civil–military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington SP. Political order and changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Ian. Venezuela’s Chávez: new coup plot discovered. Associated Press. September 12, 2008.

  • James, Ian. Housewives, bankers battle in Chávez militia. Associated Press. May 3, 2010a.

  • James, Ian. Venezuelan ex-general accused of revealing secrets. Associated Press. August 11, 2010b

  • Jeter, Jon. Commanders purged in Argentina. Washington Post. May 29, 2003.

  • Kurczy, Stephen. Ecuador’s Rafael Correa extends alert, raises police pay days after ‘coup attempt’. Christian Science Monitor. October 5, 2010.

  • La Razón. Bolivia military to gain new role, ‘vision’ under Morales. September 10, 2006.

  • La Razón. Bolivian president accuses US agency of assassination attempt. April 13, 2009.

  • La Tercera (Chile). Presidente Piñera firma proyecto que financia a FFAA y pone fin a Ley Reservada del Cobre. May 16, 2011.

  • Lehman, Stan. Brazilian president appoints new military commanders. Associated Press. February 21, 2007.

  • Levitsky S, Way LA. Linkage versus leverage: rethinking the international dimension of regime change. Comparative Politics. 2006;38(4):379–400. July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky S, Murillo M. Argentina weathers the storm. J Democr. 2003;14(4):152–66. October.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz JJ, Valenzuela A, editors. The failure of presidential democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Londregan JB, Poole KT. Poverty, the coup trap, and the seizure of executive power. World Politics. 1990;42(2):151–83. January.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak, Edward. Coup D’état: a practical handbook. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1968.

  • Madrid R. The origins of two lefts in Latin America. Political Sci Quarterly. 2010;125(4):587–609. Winter.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring S. The surprising resilience of elected governments. J Democr. 1999;10(3):101–14. July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapstone, Naomi. Ecuador purges police after revolt. Financial Times. October 1, 2010.

  • Marshall MG, Marshall DR, editors. Coup d’État Events, 1946–2010 codebook. Typescript. Vienna: Center for Systemic Peace; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy JL. International response to democratic crisis in the Americas, 1990–2005. Democratization. 2006;13(5):756–75. December.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MercoPress South Atlantic News Agency. Bolivia’s Morales accuses Washington of encouraging ‘failed coup in Ecuador’. October 4, 2010.

  • The Military Balance. Caribbean and Latin America. 107, no. 1: 51–92. 2007.

  • The Military Balance. Caribbean and Latin America, 109, no. 1: 53–98. 2009.

  • Moya Ocampos Diego. President hikes Venezuelan armed forces salary, denies presence of Iranian special forces. World Markets Research Centre. April 27, 2010.

  • Navia Roberto. Bolivia makes largest investment in armed forces of last 20 years. El Diario. August 23, 2009.

  • Neuman William. Appointments unsettle state of Venezuelan politics. The New York Times. January 7, 2012.

  • Norden D. Civilian authority without civilian dominance: assessing Venezuelan political–military relations under Chávez. Nueva Sociedad. 2008;213:170–87. January-February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger E. Soldiers in politics: military coups and governments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell G. Delegative democracy. J Democr. 1994;5(1):55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, Andres. Latin American militaries playing with fire. Miami Herald, November 22, 2010.

  • Pion-Berlin D, Trinkunas H. Civilian Praetorianism and military shirking during constitutional crises in Latin America. Comparative Politics. 2010;42(4):395–411. July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pion-Berlin D. Militares y democracia en el nuevo siglo. Cuatro descubrimientos inesperados y una conclusión sorprendente. Nueva Sociedad. 2008;213:50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlivan JT. Coup-proofing: its practice and consequences in the Middle East. Int Secur. 1999; 24(2):131–65. Fall.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remmer K. The process of democratization in Latin America. Stud Comp Int Dev. 1992;27(4):3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, Simon. Bolivia leader lets Venezuela send soldiers, angering foes. New York Times, January 9, 2007a.

  • Romero, Simon. Venezuela spending on arms soars to world’s top ranks. New York Times. February 25, 2007b.

  • Romero, Simon. Ecuador’s leader purges military and moves to expel American Base. New York Times. April 21, 2008a.

  • Romero, Simon. Alleging coup plot, Chávez Ousts U.S. envoy. New York Times. September 12, 2008b.

  • Romero, Simon. Chávez seeks tighter grip on military. New York Times. May 29, 2009.

  • Romero, Simon. Purging loyalists, Chávez tightens his inner circle. New York Times. February 17, 2010a.

  • Romero, Simon. Concern rises in Venezuela about Cuba’s military influence; critics of Chávez fear he’s building a tool to snuff out challenges. International Herald Tribune. June 15, 2010b.

  • Romero, Simon. Standoff in Ecuador ends with leader’s rescue. New York Times. October 1, 2010c.

  • Romero, Simon. Debate over meaning of standoff in Ecuador. New York Times. October 3, 2010d.

  • Romero, Simon. Ecuador leader confounds supporters and detractors. New York Times. October 9, 2010e.

  • Romero, Simon. A candidate in Peru tacks toward Brazil’s course. New York Times. April 30, 2011.

  • Sanchez, Fabiola. Chávez decree strengthens pro-government militias. Associated Press, March 23, 2011.

  • Schimmelfennig F. The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. Int Organ. 2001;55(1):47–80. March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • States News Service. Bolivia’s military: it’s a difficult life, but certainly there is no sign of a pending military coup. November 5, 2008.

  • Stepan A. The military in politics: changing patterns in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan A. The new professionalism of internal warfare and military role expansion. In: Stepan A, editor. Authoritarian Brazil: origins, policies, and future. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1973. p. 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database 2011. http://milexdata.sipri.org. Accessed 24 May 2011.

  • Stokes Susan C. Globalization and the rise of the left in Latin America. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University. 2008.

  • Taylor, Brian. Politics and the Russian Army: civil–military relations, 1689–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2003.

  • Toothaker, Christopher. Venezuela’s Chávez accuses Washington of trying to turn military against him. Associated Press. August 20, 2007.

  • Toothaker, Christopher. Chávez slams critics for downplaying alleged plot. Associated Press. September 15, 2008.

  • Toothaker, Christopher. Chávez: foes seek Libya-like uprising in Venezuela. Associated Press, March 13, 2011.

  • Toro, Francisco. How Hugo Chávez became irrelevant. New York Times. October 5, 2012.

  • UPI. Prison term for Venezuelan general. May 9, 2010a.

  • UPI. Bolivia builds defenses against ‘poachers’. August 9, 2010b.

  • Valdez, Carlos. Bolivia begins military training for civilians. Associated Press. August 5, 2010.

  • Valenzuela A. Latin American presidencies interrupted. J Democr. 2004;15(4):5–19. October.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas Velasquez A. Una convivencia inesperada: Fuerzas Armadas y gobiernos de izquierda en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad. 2008;213:80–94. January-February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland K. The performance of leftist governments in Latin America: conceptual and theoretical issues. In: Weyland K, Madrid RL, Hunter W, editors. Leftist governments in Latin America: successes and shortcomings. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • WIKILEAKS. 06CARACAS219, Cuba/Venezuela Axis of Mischief: The View From. 2006. http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2006/01/06CARACAS219.html#par6 and http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2006/01/06CARACAS219.html#par7. Accessed: March 1 2011.

  • WIKILEAKS. 07LAPAZ3262, Military stand down more likely than heavy hand. 2007a. http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2007/12/07LAPAZ3262.html#par12. Accessed: March 1, 2011.

  • WIKILEAKS. 07LAPAZ3153, Venezuela-Bolivia: how much fire behind the smoke? 2007b. http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2007/11/07LAPAZ3153.html#par4. Accessed: March 1, 2011.

  • Xinhua News Agency. Bolivian president says Chinese army donation contributes to peace, development. March 31, 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgments

A partial draft of this paper was presented at the XXIX Congress of the Latin American Studies Association in Toronto, Canada, October 6-9, 2010. We thank Will Barndt, Ryan Carlin, Michelle Dion, Gustavo Flores-Macías, Kathryn Hochstetler, Raul Madrid, Pierre Ostiguy, Brian Palmer-Rubin, David Rivera, Brian Taylor, and several anonymous reviewers for their comments and criticisms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew R. Cleary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rittinger, E.R., Cleary, M.R. Confronting Coup Risk in the Latin American Left. St Comp Int Dev 48, 403–431 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9128-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9128-9

Keywords

Navigation