Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sociology and Neuroscience: An Emerging Dialogue

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nascent discipline of social neuroscience promises to mutually enrich sociology as well as cognitive neuroscience by extending and deepening their respective models of social cognition. Where sociology brings to the table an extensive literature regarding the social contexts and dynamics of cognition, neuroscience models the cellular and computational architectures on which social cognition supervenes. However, there are two deep conceptual issues here that need to be addressed: (i) The extent to which the neurosciences can model the intentional and situational contexts of social cognition. (ii) The appropriate level of neural architecture (molecular, cellular, circuitry, system, behavioral, etc.) at which social cognition is to be mapped.

Social cognition…comprises computational strategies…and draws on a restricted set of neural structures that are sufficiently well defined that we can speak of a neural system for social cognition” (Adolphs 2006: 280).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolphs, R. (2006). What is special about social cognition? Pp. 269–286 in Cacioppo, op.cit.

  • Alexander, J. C., Jacobs, R., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (2012). The oxford handbook of cultural sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M. & Ratner K. G. (2013). The neuroscience of social cognition. Pp. 702–728 in Carlston, op. cit.

  • Appelrouth, S., & Edles, L. D. (2012). Classical and contemporary sociological theory (Vol. 2). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. (2009). Molecules, systems, and behavior. Pp. 13-40 in Bickle, J. (Ed.). (2009). The oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. (2013). History of cognitive neuroscience. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntson, G. G. (2006). Reasoning about brains. Pp. 1–40 in Cacioppo, op. cit.

  • Bickle, J. (Ed.) (2009). Explanation, reduction, and methodology in neuroscientific practice. Pp. 13–126 in Bickle, J. (Ed.). (2009). The oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Brothers, L. (1997). Friday’s footprint: How society shapes the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. D., & Peck, D. L. (Eds.). (2007). 21st century sociology: A reference handbook (Vol. 1–2). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Visser, P. S., & Pickett, C. L. (Eds.). (2006). Social neurocience: People thinking about thinking people. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C., Gerters, J., Moody, S. J., Pfaff, S., & Virk, I. (Eds.). (2012). Contemporary sociological theory. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlston, D. (Ed.). (2013). The oxford handbook of social cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catani, M., & de Schotten, M. T. (2012). Atlas of brain connections. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A., & Coslett, H. B. (Eds.). (2014). The roots of cognitive neuroscience: Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E., & O’Malley, C. D. (1996). The human brain and spinal cord: A historical study illustrated by writings from antiquity to the twentieth century (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Norman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, R. (1989). No ghost in the machine. New York: William Heinemann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (Eds.). (2011). The oxford handbook of social neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Christen, Y. (2014). New frontiers in social neuroscience. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, S. (2001). Origins of neuroscience: A history of explorations into brain science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. D. (2010). Neurosociology: The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2009). Philosophical antecedents of situated cognition. Pp. 35–51 in Robbins and Aydede, op. cit.

  • Gorelick, P. B., Testai, F. D., Hankey, G. J., & Wardlaw, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). Hankey's clinical neurology (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

  • Kandel, E. R. & Hudspeth, A. J. (2013). The brain and behavior. Pp. 5–20 in Kandel, op. cit.

  • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S. A., & Hudspeth, A. J. (Eds.). (2013). Principles of neural science (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P., Hanna, O., Amati, F. (2011). An overview of self-awareness and the brain. Pp. 314–324 in Decety & Cacioppo, op. cit.

  • Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (Eds.). (2009). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The great chain of being. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B. (2011). Development, poverty of culture, and social policy. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J. M., Kelley, W. M., Heatherton, T. F. (2014). Self-knowledge. Pp. 135–147 in Ochner & Kosslyn, op. cit.

  • Niedenthal, P. M., Eelen, J., Maringer, M. (2011). Embodiment and social cognition. Pp. 491–506 in Decety and Cacioppo, op. cit.

  • Ochsner, K. N., & Kosslyn, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of cognitive neuroscience (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropper, A. H. & Samuels, M. A. (2009). Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical.

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutt, R., & Seldman, L. (Eds.). (2015). Social neuroscience: Brain, mind, and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (2002). Twenty-one years in the Chinese room. Pp. 51–69 in Preston and Bishop, op. cit.

  • Semin, G. R., Garrido, M. V., Palma, T. (2013). Interfacing body, mind, the physical, and the social world: Socially situated cognition. Pp. 637–655 in Carlston, op. cit.

  • Silva, A. J. & Bickle, J. (2009). The science of research and the search for molecular mechanisms of cognitive functions. Pp. 9–126 in Bickle (2009a), op. cit.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1956). Critique of psychoanalytic concepts and theories. Pp. 77–87 in Feigl, H., & Scriven, M. (Eds.). (1956). Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Smith, C., & Whitaker, H. (Eds.). (2014). Brain, mind and consciousness in the history of neuroscience. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. W. (2015). Neuroanatomical terminology: A lexicon of classical and historical foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, P. (2004). Symbolic interaction and the cognitively disabled: a neglected dimension. American Sociologist, 35(4), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, P. (2014). Where does cognition occur: in one’s head or in one’s embodied/extended environment? Quarterly Review of Biology, 89(4), 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, A., Fiske, S., & Prentice, D. (Eds.). (2011). Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von der Malsburg, C., Phillips, W. A., & Singer, W. (2010). Dynamic coordination in the brain: From neurons to mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., & Vallacher, R. R. (1977). Implicit psychology: An introduction to social cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Tibbetts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tibbetts, P. Sociology and Neuroscience: An Emerging Dialogue. Am Soc 47, 36–46 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9268-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9268-7

Keywords

Navigation