The future of utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs in the USA: projected spending and savings to 2025
We develop projections of future spending on, and savings from, energy efficiency programs funded by electric and gas utility customers in the USA, under three scenarios through 2025. Our analysis, which updates a previous LBNL study, relies on detailed bottom-up modeling of current state energy efficiency policies, regulatory decisions, and demand-side management and utility resource plans. The three scenarios are intended to represent a range of potential outcomes under the current policy environment (i.e., without considering possible major new policy developments).
Key findings from the analysis are as follows:
By 2025, spending on electric and gas efficiency programs (excluding load management programs) is projected to double from 2010 levels to $9.5 billion in the medium case, compared to $15.6 billion in the high case and $6.5 billion in the low case.
Compliance with statewide legislative or regulatory savings or spending targets is the primary driver for the increase in electric program spending through 2025, though a significant share of the increase is also driven by utility DSM planning activity and integrated resource planning.
Our analysis suggests that electric efficiency program spending may approach a more even geographic distribution over time in terms of absolute dollars spent, with the Northeastern and Western states declining from over 70 % of total USA spending in 2010 to slightly more than 50 % in 2025, and the South and Midwest splitting the remainder roughly evenly.
Under our medium case scenario, annual incremental savings from customer-funded electric energy efficiency programs increase from 18.4 TWh in 2010 in the USA (which is about 0.5 % of electric utility retail sales) to 28.8 TWh in 2025 (0.8 % of retail sales).
These savings would offset the majority of load growth in the Energy Information Administration’s most recent reference case forecast, given specific assumptions about the extent to which future energy efficiency program savings are captured in that forecast.
The pathway that customer-funded efficiency programs ultimately take will depend on a series of key challenges and uncertainties associated both with the broader market and policy context and with the implementation and regulatory oversight of the energy efficiency programs themselves.
- Barbose, G., Goldman, C., & Schlegel, J. (2009). The Shifting Landscape of Ratepayer-Funded Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-2258E.
- Bipartisan Policy Center (2011). Environmental Regulation and Electric System Reliability. http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/environmental-regulation-and-electric-system-reliability
- Boonekamp, P. G. M. (2011). How much will the energy service directive contribute to the 20% EU energy savings goal? Energy Efficiency, 4, 85–301. doi:10.1007/s12053-010-9088-0. CrossRef
- Brattle Group. 2010. Potential Coal Plant Retirements Under Emerging Environmental Regulations. http://www.brattle.com/_documents/uploadlibrary/upload898.pdf
- Congressional Research Service. (2011). EPA’s Regulation of Coal-Fired Power: Is a ‘Train Wreck’ Coming? CRS-R41914
- Cooper, A., & Wood, L. (2012). Summary of Ratepayer-Funded Electric Efficiency Impacts, Budgets, and Expenditures (2010-2011). Institute for Electric Efficiency. http://www.edisonfoundation.net/iee/Documents/IEE_CEE2011_FINAL_update.pdf
- CEE (2012) State of the Efficiency Program Industry: Budgets, Expenditures and Impacts 2011. http://www.cee1.org/files/2011%20CEE%20Annual%20Industry%20Report.pdf
- CEE (2008) Energy Efficiency Programs: A $3.7Billion U.S. and Canadian Industry. 2007 Report. (http://www.cee1.org/ee-pe/2007/2007EEPReport.pdf)
- Dixon, R. K., McGowan, E., Onysko, G., & Scheer, R. M. (2010) US energy conservation and efficiency policies: challenges and opportunities, Energy Policy, 38(11), 6398–6408, ISSN 0301–4215, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.038. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421510000637)
- Eldridge, M., Neubauer, M., York, D., Vaidyanathan, S., Chittum, A., & Nadel, S. (2008). The 2008 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. http://www.aceee.org/pubs/e086.htm
- Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2012). Annual Energy Outlook, 2012. (Accessed Jun 2012)
- EPRI. (2009). Assessment of achievable potential from energy efficiency and demand response programs in the U.S.: (2010–2030). Palo Alto: EPRI. 1016987.
- Foster, B., Chittum, A., Hayes, S., Neubauer, M., Nowak, S., Vaidyanathan, S., Farley, K., Schultz, K., & Sullivan, T. (2012). The 2012 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. ACEEE Research Report EC12. http://aceee.org/research-report/e12c
- Geller, H., Harrington, P., Levine, M. D., Rosenfeld, A. H., & Tanishima, S. (2006). Policies for increasing energy efficiency: thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 34(5), 556–573. CrossRef
- Gillingham, K., Newell, R., & Palmer, K. (2004), revised September 2004. Retrospective Examination of Demand-Side Energy Efficiency Policies. RFF DP 04–19 REV http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-04-19REV.pdf
- Goldman, C., Stuart, E., Hoffman, I., Fuller, M., & Billingsley, M. (2011). Interactions between energy efficiency programs funded under the recovery act and utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-4322E, March 2011. (http://eetd.lbl.gov/EA/EMP/reports/lbnl-4322e.pdf)
- Hopper, N., Barbose, G., Goldman, C., & Schlegel, J. (2008). “Energy Efficiency as a Preferred Resource: Evidence from Utility Resource Plans in the Western United States and Canada.” Energy Efficiency, 14(2), 126–34, October 2008. http://www.springerlink.com/content/6k46076226625763.
- MEEAC (2009). The context for energy efficiency savings: electric savings update, electric net benefits and gas savings. Presentation by Council Consultants at MEEAC meeting. March 24, 2009. http://www.ma- eeac.org.
- Nadel, S. (1992) Utility demand-side management experience and potential—a critical review. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 17, 507–535. http://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/U921.pdf
- Navigant Consulting Inc. (2012) Analysis to update energy efficiency potential, goals, and targets for 2013 and beyond. Prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5A1B455F-CC46-4B8D-A1AF-34FAAF93095A/0/2011IOUServiceTerritoryEEPotentialStudyFinalReport.pdf
- Nowak, S., Kushler, M., Sciortino, M., York, D., & Witte, P. (2011). Energy efficiency resource standards: state and utility strategies for higher energy savings. ACEEE Research Report U113. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/u113
- Sciortino, M., Neubauer, M., Vaidyanathan, S., Chittum, A., Hayes, S., Nowak, S., & Molina, M. (2011). The 2011 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. ACEEE Research Report E115. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/e115
- York, D., Witte, P., Friedrich, K., & Kushler, M. (2012). A national review of natural gas energy efficiency programs. ACEEE Report Number U121. (http://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/u121.pdf
- The future of utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs in the USA: projected spending and savings to 2025
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 6, Issue 3 , pp 475-493
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Energy efficiency programs
- Natural gas
- Energy efficiency resource standards