Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent Advances in Behavioral Addiction Treatments: Focusing on Mechanisms of Change

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the latter half of the 20th century, research on behavioral treatments for addictions aimed to develop and test effective treatments. Among the treatments found to be at least moderately effective, direct comparisons failed to reveal consistent superiority of one approach over another. This ubiquitous finding held true despite underlying theories that differed markedly in their proposed causal processes related to patient change. In the 21st century, the focus of treatment research is increasingly on how treatment works for whom rather than whether it works. Studies of active treatment ingredients and mechanisms of behavioral change, while promising, have yielded inconsistent results. Simple mediation analysis may need to be expanded via inclusion of models testing for moderated mediation, mediated moderation, and conditional indirect effects. Examples are offered as to how these more complex models can lead to increased understanding of the conditions under which specific treatment interventions will be effective and mechanisms of change operative in improving behavioral treatments for addictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance

  1. Miller WR, Wilbourne PL. Mesa Grande: a methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders. Addiction. 2002;97:265–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wampold BE. The great psychotherapy debate: models, methods, and findings. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Longabaugh R, Magill M, Morgenstern J, Huebner, R.: Mechanisms of behavior change. In Addictions: A Comprehensive Guidebook. Edited by McCrady BS, & Esptein EE. Oxford University Press, 2011 (in press).

  4. Longabaugh R. The search for mechanisms of change in behavioral treatments for alcohol use disorders: a commentary. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:21S–32S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moos RH, Finney JW. Expanding the scope of alcoholism treatment. Am Psychol. 1983;38(10):1036–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chambless DL, Hollon SD. Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consult Clin Psych. 1998;66(1):7–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn C, DeRoo L, Rivara FP. The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review. Addiction. 2001;96(12):1725–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Apodaca TR, Longabaugh R. Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence. Addiction. 2009;104(5):705–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgenstern J, Longabaugh R. Cognitive-behavioral treatment for alcohol dependence: a review of evidence for its hypothesized mechanisms of action. Addiction. 2000;95(10):1475–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huebner RB, Tonigan JS. The search for mechanisms of behavior change in evidence-based behavioral treatments for alcohol use disorders: overview. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(S3):1S–3S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kazdin AE, Nock MK. Delineating mechanisms of change in child and adolescent therapy: methodological issues and research recommendation. J Child Psychol Psyc. 2003;44(8):1116–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nock MK. Conceptual and design essentials for evaluating mechanisms of change. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(S3):4S–12S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baron RM, Kenney DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. • MacKinnon DP: Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008. This book provides a comprehensive verbal and mathematical exposition of basic and advanced applications of mediation analysis. Mediation analysis is an essential pillar of mechanisms of behavioral change research.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly JF, Magill M, Stout RL. How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics Anonymous. Addict Res Theory. 2009;17(3):236–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Longabaugh R: Involvement of support networks in treatment. In Recent Developments in Alcoholism, Volume 16: Research on Alcoholism Treatment. Edited by Galanter. New York: Plenum Publishers; 2003, 133–147.

  17. Kelly JF. Spirituality in recovery: a lagged mediational analysis of Alcoholics Anonymous’ principal theoretical mechanism of behavior change. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(3):454–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kiluk BD, Nich C, Babuscio T, et al.: Quality versus quantity: acquisition of coping skills following computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2010, advance online publication.

  19. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E, et al. Coping skills training and contingency management treatments for marijuana dependence: exploring mechanisms of behavior change. Addiction. 2009;103:638–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaume J, Gmel G, Faouzi M, et al. Counsellor behaviours and patient language during brief motivational interventions: a sequential analysis of speech. Addiction. 2008;103(11):1793–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moyers TB, Martin T. Therapist influence on client language during motivational interviewing sessions. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30(3):245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amrhein PC, Miller WR, Yahne CE, et al. Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. J Consult Clin Psych. 2003;71(5):862–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vader AM, Walters ST, Prabhu GC, et al. The language of motivational interviewing and feedback: counselor language, client language, and client drinking outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010;24(2):190–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baer JS, Beadnell B, Garrett S, et al. Adolescent change language within a brief motivational intervention and substance use outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(4):570–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. • Karno MP, Longabaugh R, & Herbeck D: What explains the relationship between the therapist structure × patient reactance interaction and drinking outcome? An examination of potential mediators. Psychol Addict Behav 2010, advance online publication. This study demonstrates an example of a CIE across three behavioral therapies in which client trait reactance moderates the conditional effect of therapist structure on the client taking steps toward abstinence, which in turn predicts drinking outcome.

  26. Moyers TB, Martin T, Christopher PJ, et al. Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: where is the evidence? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(S3):40S–7S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. • Moyers TB, Martin T, Houck JM, et al.: From in-session behaviors to drinking outcomes: a causal chain for motivational interviewing. J Consult Clin Psych 2009, 77(6): 1113–1124. This study provides the only example of an unconditional indirect effect in which client change talk, the mechanism of change, partially mediates the relationship of therapist MI behaviors to post-treatment outcome.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Higgins ST, Wong CJ, Badger JG, et al. Contingent reinforcement increases cocaine abstinence during outpatient treatment and 1 year of follow-up. J Consult Clin Psych. 2000;68:64–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Beutler LE, Williams RE, Wakefield PJ, et al. Bridging scientist and practitioner perspectives in clinical psychology. Am Psychol. 1995;50(12):984–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mattson ME, Allen JP, Longabaugh R, et al. A chronological review of empirical studies matching alcoholic clients to treatment. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;S12:16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Project MATCH Research Group. Alcoholism treatment matching research: methodological and clinical approaches. J Stud Alcohol, 1994, Supplement 12.

  32. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three year drinking outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22(6):1300–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59(6):631–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and Causal Chain Analyses. Edited by Longabaugh R. & Wirtz PW. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2001,Vol. 8, Publication No. (ADM) 01–4238).

  35. Muller D, Judd CM, Yzerbyt VY. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89(6):852–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Longabaugh R, & Wirtz PW: Substantive review and critique. In Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and Causal Chain Analyses. Edited by Longabaugh, R. & Wirtz, P. W. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, NIH 2001, Vol. 8: 305–325.

  37. Cooney NL, Babor TF, & Litt MD: Matching clients to alcoholism treatment based on severity of alcohol dependence. In Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and Causal Chain Analyses. Edited by Longabaugh RH & Wirtz PW. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series. Rockville, MD: NIAAA 2001, Vol. 8: 30–43.

  38. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Zweben A, Stout RL. Network support for drinking, alcoholics anonymous and long term matching effects. Addiction. 1998;93(9):1313–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Karno MP, Longabaugh R. What do we know? Process analysis and the search for a better understanding of project MATCH’s anger-by-treatment matching effect. J Stud Alcohol. 2004;65(4):501–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Witkiewitz K, Bowen S, Donovan DM. Moderating effects of a craving intervention on the relation between negative mood and heavy drinking following treatment for alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psych. 2011;79(1):54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Anton RF, O’Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, et al. Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295(17):2003–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Marlatt GA, Gordon JR. Relapse Prevention. New York: Guilford; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Preacher, K. J. Calculations for the test of conditional indirect effects [computer software]. Available at http://www.quantpsy.org. Accessed March 2011.

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brown Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA

    Richard Longabaugh

  2. Brown Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Community Health, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA

    Molly Magill

Authors
  1. Richard Longabaugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Molly Magill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Longabaugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Longabaugh, R., Magill, M. Recent Advances in Behavioral Addiction Treatments: Focusing on Mechanisms of Change. Curr Psychiatry Rep 13, 382–389 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-011-0220-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-011-0220-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation