Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Initiatives that Counter Violent Radicalization but are Perceived as Suitable by Targeted Communities

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To redress the scourge of violent extremism, an array of policies, programs, and practices have been implemented. Yet, these initiatives could sometimes conflict with the preferences of individuals who may be susceptible to radicalization. To illustrate, some initiatives might challenge the values of these individuals. The degree to which these individuals feel significant or important might thus decrease—a decrease that has been shown to rouse the pursuit of violent radicalization. To prevent this complication, two studies were designed to uncover programs, policies, or practices that align to the preferences of people who may be more susceptible than average to violent radicalization. In Study 1, three individuals who had been charged with crimes related to terrorism, but had since relinquished extremism, were asked to suggest initiatives they feel could prevent violent radicalization in Australian Muslims. Similarly, in the second study, young Australian Muslim adults who rejected extremist ideologies were asked the same question. The participants advocated initiatives that foster tolerance towards diverse perspectives, inspire individuals to trust their values and intuition, encourage civic engagement, improve the credibility of imams, and enable people to derive strength from their community. A review of previous literature indicates that many of these initiatives might not only resonate with the preferences of individuals who may be vulnerable to violent extremism but could also foster a sense of significance and meaning in life—an experience that tends to prevent radicalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzam M (2007) Radicalization of Muslim communities in Europe. Brown J World Aff 13:123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann N, Kuhl J (2003) Self-infiltration: confusing assigned tasks as self-selected in memory. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 29:487–497. doi:10.1177/0146167202250916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann N, Kuhl J (2005) How to resist temptation: the effects of external control versus autonomy support on self-regulatory dynamics. J Pers 73:443–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhui K, Warfa N, Jones E (2014). Is violent radicalisation associated with poverty, migration, poor self-reported health and common mental disorders? Plos ONE 9(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090718

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm JW, Brehm SS (1981) Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherney A, Hartley J (2015) Community engagement to tackle terrorism and violent extremism: challenges, tensions and pitfalls. Polic Soc. doi:10.1080/10439463.2015.1089871

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherney A, Murphy K (2015) Being a ‘suspect community’ in a post 9/11 world-the impact of the war on terror on Muslim communities in Australia. Aust N Z J Criminol. doi:10.1177/0004865815585392

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherney A, Murphy K (2016) What does it mean to be a moderate Muslim in the war on terror? Muslim interpretations and reactions. Crit Stud Terrorism

  • Cottee S, Hayward K (2011) Terrorist (e)motives: the existential attractions of terrorism. Stud Confl Terrorism 34:963–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw M (1981) The causes of terrorism. Comp Polit 13:379–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis A, van Olden Z (2006) On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. J Exp Soc Psychol 42:627–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doosje B, Loseman A, van den Bos K (2013) Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. J Soc Issues 69(3):586–604. doi:10.1111/josi.12030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugas M, Kruglanski AW (2014) The quest for significance model of radicalization: implications for the management of terrorist detainees. Behav Sci Law 32(3):423–439. doi:10.1002/bsl.2122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feddes AR, Mann L, Doosje B (2015) Increasing self‐esteem and empathy to prevent violent radicalization: a longitudinal quantitative evaluation of a resilience training focused on adolescents with a dual identity. J Appl Soc Psychol 45(7):400–411. doi:10.1111/jasp.12307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Githens-Mazer J (2008) Variations on a theme: radical violent Islamism and European North African radicalization. Polit Sci Polit 41:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez C, Rosen B (2001) The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group Organ Manag 26:53–69. doi:10.1177/1059601101261004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M (1995) The Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of LMX theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level, multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q 6:219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman M, Tahiri H (2015) Community perceptions of radicalisation and violent extremism: an Australian perspective. J Polic Intell Count Terrorism 10(1):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez M, Mullins C (2015). The radicalization puzzle: a theoretical synthesis of empirical approaches to homegrown extremism. Studies Confl Terrorism 38(11). doi:10.1080/1057610X.2015.1051375

  • Harris-Hogan S, Barrelle K, Zammit A (2016) What is countering violent extremism? Exploring CVE policy and practice in Australia. Behav Sci Terrorism Polit Aggress 8(1):6–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks JA, Cicero DC, Trent J, Burton CM, King LA (2010) Positive affect, intuition, and feelings of meaning. J Pers Soc Psychol 98:967–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan J (2009) Individual disengagement: a psychological perspective. In: Bjorgo T, Horgan J (eds) Leaving terrorism behind: individual and collective disengagement. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey MJ, Jetten J (2004) The individual within the group: balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 8:248–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspal R, Cinnirella M (2010) Coping with potentially incompatible identities: accounts of religious, ethnic and sexual identities from British Pakistani men who identify as Muslim and gay. Br J Soc Psychol 49(4):849–870

  • Johnson IR, Fujita K (2012) Change we can believe in: using perceptions of changeability to promote system-change motives over system-justification motives in information search. Psychol Sci 23:133–140. doi:10.1177/0956797611423670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer RM (1994) The sinister attribution error: paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motiv Emot 18:199–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RA, Casey MA (2000) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied researchers, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski AW, Chen X, Dechesne M, Fishman S, Orehel E (2009) Fully committed: suicide bombers’ motivation and the quest for personal significance. Polit Psychol 30:331–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AY, Aaker JL (2004) Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 86:205–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer ND, Tormala ZL (2010) “Think” versus “feel” framing effects in persuasion. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 36:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGilloway A, Ghosh P, Bhui K (2015) A systematic review of pathways to and processes associated with radicalization and extremism amongst Muslims in Western societies. Int Rev Psychiatry 27(1):39–50. doi:10.3109/09540261.2014.992008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman M (1994) An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam FM (2005) A staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration. Am Psychol 60:161–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norton MI, Benoit B, Cooper J, Hogg MA (2003) Vicarious dissonance: attitude change from the inconsistency of Others. J Pers Soc Psychol 85:47–62

  • O’Driscol MP, Pierce JL, Coghlan A (2006) The psychology of ownership: work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group Organ Manag 31:388–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2001) Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 27:298–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter LE, Kebbell MR (2010) Radicalization in Australia: examining Australia’s convicted terrorists. Psychiatry Psychol Law 18:212–231. doi:10.1080/13218719.2010.482953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan K, Isaacowitz DM (2006) An attentional application of socioemotional selectivity theory in college students. Soc Dev 15:326–338. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9507.2006.00344.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quick BL, Stephenson MT (2007) Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Commun Res 34:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rains SA, Turner M (2007) Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: a test and extension of the intertwined model. Hum Commun Res 33:241–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber R, Schwarz N (1999) Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Conscious Cogn: Int J 8:338–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher S, Haslam SA, Rath R (2008) Making a virtue of evil: a five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2:1313–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin RS, Munz D, Bommer WH (2005) Leading from within: the effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Acad Manag J 48:845–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sageman M (2008) A strategy for fighting international Islamic terrorists. ANNALS Am Acad Polit Sci 618:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage S, Khan A, Liht J (2014). Preventing violent extremism through value complexity: being Kenyan being Muslim. J Strateg Secur 7(3):1–26

  • Schlegel RJ, Hicks JA, Arndt J, King LA (2009) Thine own self: true self-concept accessibility and meaning in life. J Pers Soc Psychol 96:473–490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley E, Moss SA, Wilson SG (2014) Authoritarian leaders cultivate the followers they deserve the effect of leadership style on decision making. J Leadersh Manag 1:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber MD, Bhatt A (2007) Radicalization in the West: the home grown threat. New York Police Department, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silke A (2001) The devil you know: continuing problems with research on terrorism. Terrorism Polit Violence 13:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke A (2008) Holy warriors: exploring the psychological processes of jihadi radicalization. Eur J Criminol 5:99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon L,Greenberg J, Brehm JW (1995) Trivialization: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. J Personality Social Psych 68:247–260

  • Sohrabi H (2015) Identity and Muslim leadership: the case of Australian Muslim leaders. Contemp Islam. doi:10.1007/s11562-015-0325-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman TF, Baumeister RF, Lambert NM, Crescioni AW, DeWall CD, Fincham FD (2009) Alone and without purpose: life loses meaning following social exclusion. J Exp Soc Psychol 45:686–694

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M, Horgan J (2006) A conceptual framework for addressing psychological process in the development of the terrorist. Terrorism Polit Violence 18:585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock PE (1983) Cognitive style and political ideology. J Pers Soc Psychol 45:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsintsadze-Maass E, Maass RW (2014) Groupthink and terrorist radicalization. Terrorism Polit Violence 26(5):735–758. doi:10.1080/09546553.2013.805094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldhuis T, Staun J (2009). Islamist radicalisation: a root cause model. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations

  • Weine S (2015). Understanding community attitudes towards CVE. START Research Brief, The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism

  • Wilson T, Gilbert DT (2003) Affective forecasting. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 35:345–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeste MP (2014) A cognitive-behavioral approach to violent radicalization, based on a real case. Psicol Política 49:7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Young HF, Rooze M, Holsappel J (2015) Translating conceptualizations into practical suggestions: what the literature on radicalization can offer to practitioners. Peace Conflict: J Peace Psychol 21(2):212–225. doi:10.1037/pac0000065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zammit A (2013) Explaining a turning point in Australian Jihadism. Stud Conflict Terrorism 36(9):739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Political & Social Inquiry, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

    Rosleenda B Mohamed Ali, Kate Barrelle & Peter Lentini

  2. School of Psychological and Clinical Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Dr, Casuarina, NT, 0810, Australia

    Simon A Moss

Authors
  1. Rosleenda B Mohamed Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon A Moss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kate Barrelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Lentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon A Moss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, R.B.M., Moss, S.A., Barrelle, K. et al. Initiatives that Counter Violent Radicalization but are Perceived as Suitable by Targeted Communities. J Police Crim Psych 32, 43–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9195-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9195-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation