Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A survey of university-based programs that support in-service and pre-service mathematics teachers’ change

  • Survey Paper
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This survey paper discusses recent relevant contributions and trends in university-based teacher education ‘programs’ for in-service and pre-service teachers. The goal of this small-scale survey of the mathematics education literature was to identify examples of studies that investigated such programs and their effectiveness in supporting change in teachers’ knowledge, disposition, and teaching for the improvement of students’ learning of mathematics. Themes emerging from the sample of these studies are identified and described to illustrate the nature and effectiveness of the programs, and implications for teacher education. Connections are made to the themes used to frame this special issue of ZDM Mathematics Education and how the studies in it contribute to this aspect of the field of mathematics education and further our understanding of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsawaie, O. N., & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers’ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, S. (2009). Chinese teachers’ knowledge of teaching multi-digit division. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school mathematics teachers in China and the U.S. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, S., & Wu, Z. (2014). Using the evidence-based MSA approach to enhance teacher knowledge in student mathematics learning and assessment. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 108–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, S. A. (2017). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of interdisciplinary pedagogy: The case of elementary mathematics-science integrated lessons. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(2).

  • Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, L., Bicer, A., Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., Foran, A., Grant, M. R., Lincoln, Y. S., Nite, S. B., Oner, A. T., & Rice, D. (2017). Run! Spot. Run!–Vocabulary development and the evolution of STEM disciplinary language for secondary teachers. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(2).

  • Bartell, T. G., Webel, C., Bowen, B., & Dyson, N. (2013). Prospective teacher learning: recognizing evidence of conceptual understanding. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boston, M. D. (2013). Connecting changes in secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge to their experiences in a professional development workshop. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz, N.F. (2017). The acquisition of mathematics pedagogical content knowledge in university mathematics education courses–Results of a mixed-method study on the effectiveness of teacher education in Germany. ZDM Mathematics Education,49(2).

  • Cajkler, C., Wood, P., Norton, J., & Pedder, D. (2014). Lesson study as a vehicle for collaborative teacher learning in a secondary school. Professional Development in Education, 40(4), 511–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, O. (2009). Self-study as a basis of prospective mathematics teachers’ learning of problem solving for teaching. In S. Lerman & B. Davis (Eds.), Mathematical action and structures of noticing (pp. 163–174). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, O. (2014). Reflective awareness in mathematics teachers’ learning and teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 11(2), 313–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. (2016). Learning to attend to precision: The impact of micro-teaching guided by expert secondary mathematics teachers on pre-service teachers’ teaching practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(2).

  • Clark, L. M., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Nishio, M., Campbell, P. F., Smith, T. M., Griffin, M. J., Rust, A. H., Conant, D. L., & Choi, Y. (2014). Teacher characteristics associated with mathematics teachers’ beliefs and awareness of their students’ mathematical dispositions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(2), 246–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Roche, A., Cheeseman, J., & van der Schans, S. (2014). Teaching strategies for building student persistence on challenging tasks: Insights emerging from two approaches to teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 46–70.

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The quality of teaching matters most. Journal of Staff Development, 18, 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, T. P., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2011). Focus in high school mathematics: Technology to support reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Findell, B. (2010). The mathematical education of prospective teachers ofsecondary school mathematics: Old assumptions, new challenges. Mathematics and the Mathematical Sciences, 31–41.

  • Guberman, R., & Leikin, R. (2013). Interesting and difficult mathematical problems: changing teachers’ views by employing multiple-solution tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaleli-Yilmaz, G. (2015). The views of mathematics teachers on the factors affecting the integration of technology in mathematics courses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatas, I. (2014). Changing pre-service mathematics teachers’ beliefs about using computers for teaching and learning mathematics: The effect of three different models. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, B. (2016). Impact of the course teaching and learning of mathematics on pre-service grades 7 and 8 mathematics teachers in Singapore. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(2).

  • Krauss, S., Baumert, J., & Blum, W. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(5), 873–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, K., & Romina, J. (2015). Using transactional distance theory to redesign an online mathematics education course for pre-service primary teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(1), 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G.C., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (Eds.) (2002). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? New York: Springer.

  • Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: a theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 285–304.

  • Lin, P. (2016). A practicum mentoring model for supporting prospective elementary teachers in learning to teach mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(2).

  • Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Educations, 13, 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maaß, J., & Schlöglmann, W. (Eds.). (2009). Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education. Rotterndam. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasepp, B. & Bobis, J. (2014). Prospective primary teachers' beliefs about mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 89–107.

  • McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., Drake, C., & Land, T. (2014). Using video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nason, R., Chalmers, C., & Yeh, A. (2012). Facilitating growth in prospective teachers’ knowledge: teaching geometry in primary schools. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (2016). NCATE glossary. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 2016 from http://www.ncate.org/Standards/UnitStandards/Glossary/tabid/477/Default.aspx.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, J., & Leavy, A. M. (2013). Teaching mathematical problem-solving from an emergent constructivist perspective: the experiences of Irish primary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 293–318.

  • Ponte, J. P. D., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practices. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present, and future (pp. 461–494). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

  • Ponte, J. P., Santos, L., Oliveira, H., & Henriques, A. (2017). Research on teaching practice in a Portuguese initial secondary mathematics teacher education program. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(2).

  • Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, T. E. (2011). Process reflection during Japanese lesson study experiences by prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 251–267.

  • Santagata, R., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2005). The use of videos for teacher education and professional development: past experiences and future directions. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass. (Eds.), Current perspectives on applied information technologies (Volume 2): Preparing teachers to teach with technology (pp. 151–167). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2014). Learning to teach mathematics and to analyze teaching effectiveness: evidence from a video- and practice-based approach. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, J., & Clay, E. L. (2009). Online asynchronous collaboration in mathematics teacher education and the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Teacher Educator, 54–73.

  • Stohlmann, M., Cramer, K., Moore, T., & Maiorca, C. (2014/2015). Changing pre-service elementary teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 4–24.

  • Taylor, E. V. (2012). Supporting children’s mathematical understanding: professional development focused on out-of-school practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanh, T. N., Rijkje Dekker, R., & Goedhart, M. J. (2008). Preparing Vietnamese student teachers for teaching with a student-centered approach. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 155–176.

  • Verhoef, N. C., Coenders, F., Pieters, J. M., van Smaalen, D., & Tall, D. O. (2015). Professional development through lesson study: teaching the derivative using GeoGebra. Professional Development in Education, 41(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z. (2017). Effects of using problem of the week in teaching on teaching learning and change in algebra thinking and algebra. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(2).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhua An.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chapman, O., An, S. A survey of university-based programs that support in-service and pre-service mathematics teachers’ change. ZDM Mathematics Education 49, 171–185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0852-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0852-x

Keywords

Navigation