Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Good teaching feels good—but what is “good teaching”? Exploring teachers’ definitions of teaching success in mathematics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teacher emotions are of growing interest in educational research, but empirical findings are still scarce. In their recent model illustrating the possible causes and effects of teacher emotions, Frenzel and colleagues argue that emotions are driven by subjective appraisals of success and failure. Specifically, these authors propose that teachers judge their teaching success based on specific dimensions of student behaviors (output orientation). Moreover, there are multiple models on instructional quality detailing which teacher behaviors characterize successful teaching (input orientation). To date, however, it is unknown how and when teachers themselves appraise their teaching as successful. To gain insight into teachers’ appraisals of success, 307 mathematics teachers responded to an open-ended question about their criteria for math teaching success. Results showed that teachers’ responses could be organized into six categories that mapped partly onto Frenzel’s output-oriented model and partly onto the input-oriented instructional quality literature: (1) students’ mathematical skills, (2) students’ engagement, (3) students’ social skills, (4) cognitive activation and structured presentation of the learning content, (5) structured organization of the learning environment and (6) feedback. These findings highlight student behavior, teacher behavior and feedback as key sources for mathematics teachers’ subjective definitions of successful teaching and ultimately their emotional lives in the mathematics classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(adapted from Frenzel 2014)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderman, L., & Klassen, R. (2015). Being a teacher: Efficacy, emotions, and interpersonal relationships in classroom settings. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (3rd edn., pp. 402–414). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63–83). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavarian ministry for education (2015). School and education in Bavaria 2015—a statistical overview. https://www.km.bayern.de/statistik. Accessed 25 Sep 2016.

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S.; & Neubrand, M. (2011). Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Unterricht und die mathematische Kompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern. COACTIV – Ein Forschungsprogramm. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss & W. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften (pp. 7–25). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. S., Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Taxer, J. L. (2015). Antecedents of teachers’ emotions in the classroom: An intraindividual approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00635. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107(5), 1060–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, L. M., Hochweber, J., Hartig, J., & Klieme, E. (2013). Schulentwicklung im Verlauf eines Jahrzehnts—Erste Ergebnisse des PISA-Schulpanels. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft, 59, 172–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, W., Wendt, H., Köller, O., & Selter, C. (Eds.). (2012). TIMSS 2011–Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2000). Teaching. Brussels: International Academy of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org. Accessed 23 Nov 2012.

  • Buff, A., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Pauli, C. (2011). Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom: “Nice to have” or something more? Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 452–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (2007). Teachers’ achievement goal orientations and associations with teachers’ help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M.-L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Kelchtermans, G., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino, P., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., Liljedahl, P., Morselli, F., Pantziara, M., & Schukajlow, S. (2015, February). Introduction to the papers of TWG08: Affect and mathematical thinking. In Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education (CERME9) (pp. 1104–1107).

  • Frenzel, A. C. (2014). Teacher emotions. In R. Pekrun & E. A. Linnenbrink (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 494–519). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2015). Teaching this class drives me nuts!—examining the person and context specificity of teacher emotions. PLoS One, 10(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129630. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.

  • Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Stephens, E. J., & Jacob, B. (2009). Antecedents and effects of teachers’ emotional experiences: An integrated perspective and empirical test. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 129–151). Boston: Springer US.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Durksen, T. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Measuring teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The Teacher Emotions Scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148–163. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, B. (2013). Teachers need real feedback. Contribution on TED channel. https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_teachers_need_real_feedback/transcript. Accessed 10 May 2016.

  • Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Bieg, M., Keller, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., & Hall, N. C. (2015). The glass half empty: How emotional exhaustion affects the state-trait discrepancy in self-reports of teaching emotions. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0137441. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19(1), 3–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenauer, G., Hascher, T., & Volet, S. E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: Associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(4), 385–403. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0250-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811–826. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (Ed.). (2005). Extending educational change. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hascher, T. (2005). Emotionen im Schulalltag, Wirkungen und Regulationsformen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 51(5), 610–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800 + meta-analyses on achievement. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, A. (2003). Unterrichtsqualität erfassen, bewerten, verbessern. Seelze: Kallmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarty, K. Y., Lang, T. R., & Kromrey, J. D. (2003). Another look at technology use in classrooms: the development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ perceptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 138–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerusalem, M., & Pekrun, R. (1999). Emotion, Motivation und Leistung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, E. (Ed.), (2005). Standards für die politische Bildung: Zwischen Weltwissen, Teilhabekompetenz und Lebenshilfe. Springer-Verlag.

  • Kaiser, G., & Vollstedt, M. (2007). Teachers’ views on effective mathematics teaching: Commentaries from a European perspective. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 39(4), 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150–165. doi:10.1037/a0026253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 90–106. doi:10.1177/0022487112460398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom, (pp. 137–160). Münster: Waxmann.

  • Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S. (2001). Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: “Aufgabenkultur” und Unterrichtsgestaltung. In TIMSS-Impulse für Schule und Unterricht (pp. 43–57). Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.

  • Kunter, M. (2005). Multiple Ziele im Mathematikunterricht. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2011). Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften–Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, H., & Whitney, D. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 601–613). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. M. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 334–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertler, C. A. (2003). Patterns of response and nonresponse from teachers to traditional and web surveys. Practical Assessement, Research & Evaluation, 8(22). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=22. Accessed 21 April 2016.

  • Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Reconceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65–88.

  • Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2000). A social cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, K. L., Sampson, P. D., Caplan, R. A., Ward, R. J., & Cheney, F. W. (1990). Measuring interrater reliability among multiple raters: An example of methods for nominal data. Statistics in Medicine, 9, 1103–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, K. (2008). Motivationsunterstützung im Mathematikunterricht–Unterricht aus der Perspektive von Lernenden und Beobachtern. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2007). Structure as a quality feature in mathematics instruction. Cognitive and motivational effects of a structured organisation of the learning environment vs. a structured presentation of learning content. In M. Prenzel (Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools, The final report on the DFG Priority Programme (pp. 101–120). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaarschmidt, U., & Kieschke, U. (Eds.). (2007). Gut gerüstet für den Schulalltag. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.). (2007). Emotions in education. San Diego: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: Role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358. doi:10.1023/A:1026131715856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, P. M. (2010). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2015). Facets of teachers’ emotional lives: A quantitative investigation of teachers’ genuine, faked, and hidden emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42, 78–88. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vom Hofe, R., Pekrun, R., Kleine, M., & Götz, T. (2002). Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA). Konstruktion des Regensburger Mathematikleistungstests für 5.-10. Klassen. In M. Prenzel & J. Doll (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Schulische und außerschulische Bedingungen mathematischer, naturwissenschaftlicher und überfachlicher Kompetenzen. Beiheft (Vol. 45, pp. 83–100). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Institute of Educational Science, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Regensburger Str. 160, 90478, Nuremberg, Germany

      Barbara Jacob

    2. Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802, Munich, Germany

      Anne C. Frenzel & Elizabeth J. Stephens

    Authors
    1. Barbara Jacob
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Anne C. Frenzel
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Elizabeth J. Stephens
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Barbara Jacob.

    Additional information

    B. Jacob and A. C. Frenzel contributed equally to this work.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Jacob, B., Frenzel, A.C. & Stephens, E.J. Good teaching feels good—but what is “good teaching”? Exploring teachers’ definitions of teaching success in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education 49, 461–473 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0848-6

    Download citation

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0848-6

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation