Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: what makes the difference?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to uncertainty regarding the relationship between mathematical creativity, mathematical expertise and general giftedness, we have conducted a large-scale study that explores the relationship between mathematical creativity and mathematical ability. We distinguish between relative and absolute creativity in order to address personal creativity as a characteristic that can be developed in schoolchildren. This paper presents part of a study that focuses on the power of multiple solution tasks (MSTs) as a tool for the evaluation of relative creativity. We discuss relationships between mathematical creativity, mathematical ability and general giftedness as reflected in the present empirical study of senior high school students in Israel which implemented the MST tool. The study demonstrates that between-group differences are task dependent and are a function of mathematical insight as it is integrated in the mathematical task. Thus, we conclude that different types of MSTs can be used for different research purposes, which we discuss at the end of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities: An introduction to gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. S. (2009). Approaches to the teaching of creative and non-creative mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E. (1986). Insight and giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 201–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E. (2003). Insights about insightful problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 149–175). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42–53). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guberman, R., & Leikin, R. (2012). Interest and difficulty: Changes in teachers’ views of multiple solution tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (on-line).

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, S., Peled, I., & Littler, G. (2009). Mathematical creativity and giftedness in elementary school: Task and teacher promoting creativity for all. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 255–269). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Translated from Russian by J. Teller; Edited by J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Kwon, O. N., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2006). About four types of mathematical connections and solving problems in different ways. Aleh—The (Israeli) Senior School Mathematics Journal, 36, 8–14 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2007). Habits of mind associated with advanced mathematical thinking and solution spaces of mathematical tasks. In D. Pitta-Pantazi, & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education—CERME-5 (pp. 2330–2339) (CD-ROM and on-line). http://ermeweb.free.fr/Cerme5.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.

  • Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Korea: The Korea Society of Education Studies in Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2013). Using multiple solution tasks for the evaluation of students’ problem-solving performance in geometry. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (accepted).

  • Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H. (1971). Creativity and education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R., & Hong, E. (2009). Talent loss in mathematics: Causes and solutions. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 149–163). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overtoom-Corsmit, R., Dekker, R., & Span, P. (1990). Information processing in intellectually highly gifted children by solving mathematical tasks. Gifted Education International, 6, 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1999). Identification of creativity. In J. Piirto (Ed.), Talented children and adults: Their development and education (pp. 136–184). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 332–357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, L. J. (2009). Developing mathematical creativity—questions may be the answer. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 87–100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39, 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Pillmeier, E., & Jarvin, L. (2009). The psychosocial dimensions of creativity in mathematics: Implications for gifted education policy. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 165–179). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/1982). Imagination and its development in childhood. In V. V. Davydov (Ed.), General problems of psychology. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 2, pp. 438–454). Moscow: Pedagogika (in Russian).

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/1984). Imagination and creativity in adolescent. In D. B. Elkonin (Ed.), Child psychology. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 4, pp. 199–219). Moscow: Pedagogika (in Russian).

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M. (2009). Educational technology and curricular design: Promoting mathematical creativity for all students. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Mathematical creativity and the education of gifted students (pp. 101–113). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. We are thankful to the Israeli Ministry of Education and the University of Haifa for their generous financial support to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roza Leikin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leikin, R., Lev, M. Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: what makes the difference?. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 183–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0460-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0460-8

Keywords

Navigation