Skip to main content
Log in

Simplified seismic performance assessment and implications for seismic design

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The last decade or so has seen the development of refined performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) approaches that now provide a framework for estimation of a range of important decision variables, such as repair costs, repair time and number of casualties. This paper reviews current tools for PBEE, including the PACT software, and examines the possibility of extending the innovative displacement-based assessment approach as a simplified structural analysis option for performance assessment. Details of the displacement-based s+eismic assessment method are reviewed and a simple means of quickly assessing multiple hazard levels is proposed. Furthermore, proposals for a simple definition of collapse fragility and relations between equivalent single-degree-of-freedom characteristics and multi-degree-of-freedom story drift and floor acceleration demands are discussed, highlighting needs for future research. To illustrate the potential of the methodology, performance measures obtained from the simplified method are compared with those computed using the results of incremental dynamic analyses within the PEER performance-based earthquake engineering framework, applied to a benchmark building. The comparison illustrates that the simplified method could be a very effective conceptual seismic design tool. The advantages and disadvantages of the simplified approach are discussed and potential implications of advanced seismic performance assessments for conceptual seismic design are highlighted through examination of different case study scenarios including different structural configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI (2005), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI318-05) and Commentary (ACI318R-05), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW and Cornell CA (2006), “Spectral Shape, Epsilon and Record Selection,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(10): 1193–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry M, Parrish M and Eberhard M (2004), PEER Structural Performance Database User’s Manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, http://nisee.berkeley.edu.spd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer K, Dazio A and Priestley MJN (2008), “Seismic Design of Torsionally Eccentric Buildings with RC u-shaped Walls,” Research Report ROSE-2008/03, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM, Sullivan TJ and Welch DP (2014), “A Seismic Performance Classification Framework to Provide Increased Seismic Resilience,” 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, August 25–29 (Keynote Lecture).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvi PM and Sullivan TJ (2014), “Estimating Floor Spectra in Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems,” Earthquakes and Structures, 6(7): 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, EN 1998-1, Brussels, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl J and Keintzel E (1988), “Seismic Shear Forces in RC Cantilever Shear Walls,” Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 9-1-1, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardis MN and Biskinis DE (2003), “Deformation Capacity of RC Members, as Controlled by Flexure or Shear,” Otani Symposium, 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2012a), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: 1- Methodology, FEMA P-58-1, Prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2012b), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: 2- Implementation Guide, FEMA P-58-2, Prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SA (1978), “Prediction of Response of Concrete Buildings to Severe Earthquake Motion,” Douglas McHenry International Symposium on Concrete and Concrete Structures, SP-55, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, 589–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox MJ, Sullivan TJ and Beyer K (2014), “Capacity Design of Coupled RC Wall Structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, In press, DOI:10.1080/13632469.2014.904255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulet CA, Haselton CB, Mitrani-Reiser J, Beck, JL, Deierlein GG, Porter KA and Stewart JP (2007), “Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of a Code-Conforming Reinforced Concrete Frame Building -from Seismic Hazard to Collapse Safety and Economic Losses,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(13): 1973–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton CB and Deierlein GG (2007), “Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Buildings,” Technical Report No. 156, John A, Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselton CB, Goulet CA, Beck JL, Deierlein GG, Porter KA, Stewart JP and Taciroglu E (2007), “An Assessment to Benchmark the Seismic Performance of a Code-conforming Reinforced Concrete Momentframe Building,” Report No. PEER 2007/12, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).

    Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Press (2010), L’Aquila: il Progetto C.A.S.E, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrani-Reiser, J. (2007) “An Ounce of Prevention: Probabilistic Loss Estimation for Performance-based Earthquake Engineering,” PhD Dissertation, CalTech, Passadena, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montejo LA and Kowalsky MJ (2007), “CUMBIA: Set of Codes for the Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Members,” Technical Report No. IS-07-01, Prepared for Alaska Department Transportation, Constructed Facilities Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIST (1999), Uniformat II Elemental Classification System for Building Specifications, Cost Estimating and Cost Analysis, NISTIR 6389, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTC (2008), Norme Techniche per le Costruzioni, Decreto Ministrale (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennucci D, Sullivan TJ and Calvi G (2011), “Displacement Reduction Factors for the Design of Medium and Long-period Structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 15(S1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennucci D, Sullivan TJ and Calvi GM (2014), “Inelastic Higher-mode Response in Reinforced Concrete Wall Structures,” Earthquake Spectra, In press, DOI: 10.1193/051213EQS123M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettinga JD and Priestley MJN (2005), “Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames Designed with Direct Displacement-Based Design,” Research Report No. ROSE 2005/02, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter KA (2003), “An Overview of PEER’s Performance-based Earthquake Engineering Methodology,” Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Applications of Probability and Statistics in Engineering, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter KA, Beck JL and Shaikhutdinov R (2004), “Simplified Estimation of Economic Seismic Risk for Buildings,” Earthquake Spectra, 20(4): 1239–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN (1993), “Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering - Conflicts between Design and Reality,” Bull. NZ National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 26(3): 328–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN and Calvi GM (1991), “Towards a capacity - design Assessment Procedure for Reinforced Concrete Frames,” Earthquake Spectra, 7(3): 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM and Kowalsky MJ (2007), Displacement-based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN and Paulay T (2002), “What is the Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Walls,” Journal of the Structural Engineering Society, New Zealand, 15(1): 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEAOC (1995), Vision 2000, A Framework for Performance-based Engineering, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TJ, Calvi PM and Nascimbene R (2013a), “Towards Improved Floor Spectra Estimates for Seismic Design,” Earthquakes and Structures, 4(1): 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TJ, Pennucci D, Piazza A, Manieri S, Welch DP and Calvi GM (2013b), “General Aspects of the Displacement Based Assessment Approach,” In Developments in the Field of Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment, Edited by Sullivan TJ and Calvi GM, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TJ, Priestley MJN and Calvi GM (2008), “Estimating the Higher Mode Response of Ductile Structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(3): 456–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TJ, Priestley MJN and Calvi GM (2012), A Model Code for the Displacement-based Seismic Design of Structures, DBD12, IUSS Press, Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D and Cornell CA (2002), “Incremental Dynamic Analysis,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3): 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch DP and Sullivan TJ (2013), “Influence of Structural and Fragility Modelling Decisions in the Loss Assessment of RC Buildings,” 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2013), Kos Island, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch DP, Sullivan TJ and Calvi GM (2012), “Developing Direct Displacement-based Design and Assessment Procedures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering,” ROSE Report 2012/03, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch DP, Sullivan TJ and Calvi GM (2014), “Developing Direct Displacement-based Procedures for Simplified Loss Assessment in Performance-based Earthquake Engineering,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 18(2): 290–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Michele Calvi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, T.J., Welch, D.P. & Calvi, G.M. Simplified seismic performance assessment and implications for seismic design. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 13 (Suppl 1), 95–122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0242-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0242-0

Keywords

Navigation