Skip to main content
Log in

Auto recognition of carbonate microfacies based on an improved back propagation neural network

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though traditional methods could recognize some facies, e.g. lagoon facies, backshoal facies and foreshoal facies, they couldn’t recognize reef facies and shoal facies well. To solve this problem, back propagation neural network (BP-ANN) and an improved BP-ANN with better stability and suitability, optimized by a particle swarm optimizer (PSO) algorithm (PSO-BP-ANN) were proposed to solve the microfacies’ auto discrimination of M formation from the R oil field in Iraq. Fourteen wells with complete core, borehole and log data were chosen as the standard wells and 120 microfacies samples were inferred from these 14 wells. Besides, the average value of gamma, neutron and density logs as well as the sum of squares of deviations of gamma were extracted as key parameters to build log facies (facies from log measurements)—microfacies transforming model. The total 120 log facies samples were divided into 12 kinds of log facies and 6 kinds of microfacies, e.g. lagoon bioclasts micrite limestone microfacies, shoal bioclasts grainstone microfacies, backshoal bioclasts packstone microfacies, foreshoal bioclasts micrite limestone microfacies, shallow continental micrite limestone microfacies and reef limestone microfacies. Furthermore, 68 samples of these 120 log facies samples were chosen as training samples and another 52 samples were gotten as testing samples to test the predicting ability of the discrimination template. Compared with conventional methods, like Bayes stepwise discrimination, both the BP-ANN and PSO-BP-ANN can integrate more log details with a correct rate higher than 85%. Furthermore, PSO-BP-ANN has more simple structure, smaller amount of weight and threshold and less iteration time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BHATT A, HELLE H B. Determination of facies from well logs using modular neural networks [J]. Petroleum Geoscience, 2002, 8: 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. HALBOUTY M T. Giant oil and gas fields of the 1990s: An introduction [C]// Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade 1990–1999, AAPG Memoir 78. Tulsa: AAPG, 2003: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. AQRAWI A A M, THEHNI G A, SHERWANI G H, KAREEM B M A. Mid-Cretaceous rudist-bearing carbonates of the M Formation: An important reservoir sequence in the Mesopotamian basin, Iraq [J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1998, 21(1): 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HAYKIN S. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation [M]. London, Prentice Hall, 1999: 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WOLFF M, PELISSIER-COMBESCURE J. FACIOLOG: Automatic electrofacies determination [C]// SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium. Texas, 1982: 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SERRA O. Fundamentals of well-log interpretation: Developments in petroleum science [M]. New York: Elsevier, 1986: 354–356.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DELFINER P, PEYRET O, SERRA O. Automatic determination of lithology from well logs [J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1987, 2: 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BUSH J M, FORTNEY W G, BERRY L N. Determination of lithology from well logs by statistical analysis [J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1987, 2: 412–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DUDA R O, HART P E. Pattern classification and scene analysis [M]. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 1973: 482.

    Google Scholar 

  10. GRIMM E C. CONISS: A FORTRAN 77 program for stratigraphically constrained cluster analysis by the method of incremental sum of squares [J]. Computers & Geoscience, 1987, 13: 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. FANG J H, CHEN H C, SHULTZ A W, SHULTZ A W, MAHMOUND W. Computer-aided well correlation [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1992, 76: 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GILL D, SHAMRONY A, FLIGELMAN H. Numerical zonation of log suites and log facies recognition by multivariate clustering [J] AAPG Bulletin, 1993, 77: 1781–1791.

    Google Scholar 

  13. WERBOS P J. Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences [D]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. LI Yang, TIAN Yan-tao, CHEN Yan-tao. Multi-pattern recognition of sEMG based on improved BP neural network algorithm [C]// 29th Chinese Control Conference (CCC 2010). Beijing, 2010: 2867–2872.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CHEN Hao-rui, WANG Shao-li, GAO Zhan-yi, HU Ya-qiong. Artificial neural network approach for quantifying climate change and human activities impacts on shallow groundwater level-A case study of wuqiao in north China plain [C]// 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics. Beijing, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. IRANI R, NASIMI R. An evolving neural network using an ant colony algorithm for a permeability estimation of the reservoir [J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2012, 30(4): 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LI Zheng, LI Ren-wang, SHANG Zhao-hui WANG Hai-yan, CHEN Xiu-lan, MO Can-lin. Application of BP neural network to sale forecast for H company [C]// 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD 2012). Wuhan, 2012: 304–307.

    Google Scholar 

  18. DEZFOOLIAN M A. Body wave velocities estimation from wireline log data utilizing an artificial neural network for a carbonate reservoir, South Iran [J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2013, 31(1): 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. REN Chao, AN Ning, WANG Jian-zhou, LI Lian, HU Bin, SHANG Duo. Optimal parameters selection for BP neural network based on particle swarm optimization: A case study of wind speed forecasting [J]. Knowledge Based Systems, 2014, 56: 226–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SAMLI R, SIVRI N, SEVGEN S, KIREMITCI V Z. Applying artificial neural networks for the estimation of chlorophyll-a concentrations along the Istanbul Coast [J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2014, 23(4): 1281–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ROGERS S J, FANG J H, KARR C L, STANLEY D A. Determination of lithology from well logs using a neural network [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1992, 76: 731–739.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WONG P M, JIAN F X, TAGGART I J. A critical comparison of neural networks and discriminant analysis in lithofacies, porosity and permeability predictions [J] Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1995, 18: 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. SAGGAF M M, NEBRIJA E L. Estimation of lithologies and depositional facies from wire-line logs [J] AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84: 1633–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  24. KOHONEN T. Self-organization and associate memory [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989: 4–7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. HAGAN M T, DEMUTH H B, BEALE M. Neural network design [M]. Boston: PWS Publishing Co., 1996: 346–370.

    Google Scholar 

  26. WHITE H. Artificial Neural Networks: Approximation and learning theory [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992: 235–270.

    Google Scholar 

  27. GOLDBERG D E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning [M]. New Jersey: Addison-Wesley, 1989: 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  28. FOGEL L J. Evolutionary programming in perspective: the top-down view, in Computational Intelligence: Imitating [M]. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1994: 240–267.

    Google Scholar 

  29. RECHENBERG I. Evolution strategy, in Computational Intelligence: Imitating Life [M]. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1994: 126–178.

    Google Scholar 

  30. KOZA J R. Genetic Programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992: 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

  31. KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C. Particle swarm optimization [C]// Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Western Australia, Perth, 1995: 1942–1948.

    Google Scholar 

  32. EBERHART R C, DOBBINS R W, SIMPSON P K. Computational Intelligence PC Tools [M]. Boston: Academic Press, 1996: 147–201.

    Google Scholar 

  33. EBERHART R C, KENNEDY J. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory [C]// Prec Sixth Intl Symp on Micro Machine and Human Science (Nagoya, Japan). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center, 1995: 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  34. KENNEDY J. The particle swarm: social adaptation of knowledge [C]// Proc IEEE Intl Conf on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center, 1997: 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  35. SHI Y, EBERHART R C. A modified particle swarm optimizer [C]// Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. Los Alamitos, 1998: 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  36. CLERC M, KENNEDY J. The particle swarm-Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space [J]: IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6: 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. EBERHART R C, SHI Y. Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization [C]// Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, San Diego, CA, USA, 2000: 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  38. CARLISLE A, DOZIER G. An off-the-shelf PSO [C]// Proceedings of the Particle Swarm Optimization Workshop. Indianapolis, 2001: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  39. POLI R. Analysis of the publications on the applications of particle swarm optimization [J]. Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications, 2008(2008): 68–175.

  40. SHAW R, SRIVASTAVA S. Particle swarm optimization: A new tool to invert geophysical data [J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72: 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ J L, GARCÍA-GONZALO E, FERNÁNDEZ-ÁLVAREZ J P, MENÉNDEZ-PÉREZ C O, KUZMA H A. Particle swarm optimization (PSO): A simple and powerful algorithm family for geophysical inversion [C]// 78th Annual International Meeting. SEG, 2008, 27: 3568–3571.

    Google Scholar 

  42. NAUDET V, FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ J L, GARCÍA-GONZALO E, FERNÁNDEZ-ÁLVAREZ J P. Estimation of water table from self-potential data using particle swarm optimization (PSO) [C]// 78th Annual International Meeting. SEG, 2008, 27:1203–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  43. FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ J L, GARCÍA-GONZALO E. The PSO family: Deduction, stochastic analysis and comparison [J]. Swarm Intelligence, 2009, 3: 245–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ J L, GARCÍA-GONZALO E, FERNÁNDEZ-ÁLVAREZ J P, KUZMA H A, MENÉNDEZ-PÉREZ C O. PSO: A powerful algorithm to solve geophysical inverse problems: Application to a 1D-DC resistivity case [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2010, 71: 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ J L, GARCÍA-GONZALO E, NAUDET V. Particle swarm optimization applied to solving and appraisal the streaming potential inverse problem [J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ J L, GARCÍA-GONZALO E, FERNÁNDEZ-MUÑIZ Z, MARIETHOZ G, MUKERJI T. Posterior sampling using particle swarm optimizers and model reduction techniques [J]. International Journal of Applied Evolutionary Computation, 2010, 71(1): 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. SARASWAT P, SEN M K. Simultaneous stochastic inversion of prestack seismic data using hybrid evolutionary algorithm [C]// 80th Annual International Meeting. SEG, 2010, 29: 2850–2854.

    Google Scholar 

  48. ONWUNALU J E, DURLOFSKY L J. Application of a particle swarm optimization algorithm for determining optimum well location and type [J]. Computational Geosciences, 2010, 14: 183–198.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. SERRA O, DELFINER P, LEVERT J C. Lithology determination from well logs: Case studies [C]// SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium. Dallas, 1985: 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  50. WANG Yu-xi, TIAN Chang-bing, GAO Ji-xian, ZHANG Xue-feng, LIU Jian-qiang, TIAN Ze-pu, SONG Xin-min, LIU-bo. A quantitative explanation of carbonate microfacies based on conventional logging data: a case study of the Mishrif Formation in north Rumaila oil field of Iraq [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): 1088–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  51. POULTON M M. Computational neural networks for geophysical data processing [M]. Amsterdam: Pergamon Publishers, 2001: 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Liu  (刘波).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(41272137) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Yx., Liu, B., Gao, Jx. et al. Auto recognition of carbonate microfacies based on an improved back propagation neural network. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 3521–3535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2892-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2892-0

Keywords

Navigation