Skip to main content
Log in

The Contemporary Past of San Pedro de Atacama, Northern Chile: Public Archaeology?

  • Research
  • Published:
Archaeologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, the relationships between archaeologist and the indigenous communities in San Pedro Atacama (northern Chile) have been complex and conflicting. The study of the contemporary past in this oasis situates us fully in the present, in a horizontal timeframe that gives us the chance to try a new approach to archaeology, letting our practice be guided in a critical, reflexive manner and acknowledging that it is immersed in a fabric of social and political relations. In this article, we examine our archaeological practice as we embark on the study of capitalist expansion in San Pedro de Atacama.

Résumé

Les relations entre les archéologues et les communautés autochtones à San Pedro de Atacama (au nord du Chili) sont traditionnellement complexes et conflictuelles. L’étude du passé contemporain dans cette oasis nous situe pleinement dans le présent, sur une durée horizontale qui nous offre la possibilité d’essayer une nouvelle approche archéologique, laissant notre pratique être guidée de façon critique et réfléchie, tout en convenant qu’elle est immergée dans un tissu de relations sociales et politiques. Dans cet article, nous examinons notre pratique archéologique alors que nous entamons l’étude de l’expansion du capitalisme à San Pedro de Atacama.

Resumen

Históricamente, las relaciones entre el arqueólogo y las comunidades indígenas en San Pedro Atacama (norte de Chile) han sido complejas y conflictivas. El estudio del pasado contemporáneo en este oasis nos sitúa plenamente en el presente, en un marco de tiempo horizontal que nos ofrece la posibilidad de probar un nuevo enfoque en arqueología, dejando que nuestra práctica sea guiada de una manera reflexiva y crítica y reconociendo que está inmersa en un tejido de relaciones sociales y políticas. En el presente artículo, examinamos nuestra práctica arqueológica a medida que nos embarcamos en el estudio de la expansión capitalista en San Pedro de Atacama.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atalay, S. 2006. Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice. American Indian Quarterly 30(3–4):280–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, P. 2003. Arqueología y Sociedad: el Caso de las Comunidades Indígenas en Chile. Werken 4:59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, P. (2008) Políticas del pasado: indígenas, arqueólogos y estado en Atacama, Línea Editorial IIAM/Universidad Católica del NorteSan Pedro de Atacama.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, P. 2011. La Patrimonialización y la arqueología multicultural y las disputas de poder sobre el pasado indígena. Tesis para optar por el grado de Doctora, Universidad Católica del Norte-Universidad de Tarapacá, San Pedro de Atacama.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge University PressCambridge.,

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchli, V., Lucas, G. (2001) The Absent Present: Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. In Archaeologies of the Contemporary Pastpp. 3–18, edited by V Buchli and G Lucas, RoutledgeLondon.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenas, U. 2007. Ms. Las salinas del Valle de la Luna: historia olvidada de un asentamiento minero contemporáneo en la puna de Atacama, II región de Antofagasta. Manuscrito en posesión del autor.

  • Castañeda, Q., Matthews, Ch. (eds.) (2008) Ethnographic Archaeologies: Reflections on Stakeholders and Archaeological Practices, Altamira PressLanham.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell-chanthaphonh, C., Ferguson, T. (eds.) (2008) Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, AltamiraLanham, MD.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, M. (ed.) (2006) Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations, Altamira PressLanham.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, C. (1999) El hervor de la vida contenida en voces de ancianos atacameños. Tesis para optar al título de Antropólogo, Departamento de Antropología, Universidad Austral de ChileValdivia.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, C. (2007) Los Caminos Cruzados hacia el Imaginario Colla. Tesis para optar al grado de Magíster en Antropología, Universidad Católica del NorteAntofagasta.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnecco, C. 2008. Discursos sobre el otro. Pasos para una arqueología de la alteridad étnica. Colombia 2:101–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnecco, C. and P. Ayala. 2010. Elementos para una discusión. In Pueblos Indígenas y Arqueología en América Latina. FIAN-Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá.

  • Gómez, D. (2010) Arqueología y poblaciones caboclas de la Amazonía: entre los regímenes de transformación histórica y los dilemas de la auto-representación. In Pueblos Indígenas y Arqueología en América Latinapp. 487–512, edited by C Gnecco and P Ayala, FIAN-Universidad de los AndesBogotá.,

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Ruibal, A. (2009) Vernacular cosmopolitanism: an archaeological critique of universalistic reason. In Cosmopolitan Archaeologiespp. 113–139, edited by L Meskell, Duke University PressDurham.,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., Green, D., Neves, E. (2010) Conocimiento indígena y ciencia arqueológica. Los retos de la arqueología pública en la reserva Uaça. In Pueblos Indígenas y Arqueología en América Latinapp. 301–342, edited by C Gnecco and P Ayala, FIAN-Universidad de los AndesBogotá.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundermann, H. 2004. Inicios de Siglo en San Pedro de Atacama: Procesos, Actores e Imaginarios en una Localidad Andina. Chungara 36(1):221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2007) From ethics to politics. In Archaeology and capitalism: from ethics to politicspp. 15–40, edited by Y Hamilakis and P Duke, Left Coast PressWalnut Creek.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf, C. 2007. Archaeology is a Brand: The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Left Coast PressWalnut Creek.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibacache, S. (2007) Ascensos en el Volcán Paniri: Reconocimiento exploratorio de un adoratorio de montaña en la Región de Antofagasta. Memoria para optar al título de Arqueólogo, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de ChileSantiago.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1996) An archaeology of capitalism, BlackwellLondon.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojan, D., Angelo, D. 2005. Dominant Narratives, Social Violence and the Practice of Bolivian Archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 5(3):383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. (1999) Setting Some Terms for Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalismpp. 3–10, edited by M Leone and P Potter, Kluwer AcademicNew York.,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, J. L. 1979. Hacia una Arqueología Social. (Reunión en Teotihuacán, Octubre de 1975). Revista Nueva Antropología 3(12):65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, J. L. 1985. La Formación del Actual Pueblo de Toconce (s.XIX). Chungara 15:99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, A., Okamura, K. (2011) Introduction: New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology. In New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeologypp. 1–18, edited by K Okamur and A Matsuda, SpringerNew York.,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merriman, N. (2004) Introduction: Diversity and Dissonance in Public Archaeology. In Public Archaeologypp. 1–17, edited by N Merriman, RoutledgeLondon.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2004) Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present, BergOxford.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2005) Objects in the mirror appear closer than they are. In Materialitypp. 51–71, edited by D Miller, Duke University PressDurham.,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987) Material Culture and Mass Consumption, BlackwellOxford.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Moi, F., Morales, W. (2010) Arqueología y herencia cultural Paresi. In Pueblos Indígenas y Arqueología en América Latinapp. 513–550, edited by C Gnecco and P Ayala, FIAN-Universidad de los AndesBogotá.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez, L. 2007 [1991]. Vida y cultura en el oasis de San Pedro de Atacama, Segunda Edición. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago.

  • Potter, P. (1999) Historical archaeology and identity in modern America. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalismpp. 51–79, edited by M Leone and P Potter, Kluwer AcademicNew York.,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, F. 1994. Identidad en el laberinto: la búsqueda del sentido étnico en San Pedro deAtacama. Estudios Atacameños 11:185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanhueza, C. (2010) Atacama y Lípez. Breve historia de una ruta: escenarios históricos, estrategias indígenas y ritualidad andina. In Viajeros en Ruta: arqueología, historia y etnografía del tráfico surandino, edited by L Núñez and A Nielsen, Editorial BrujasCórdoba.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanhueza, C., Gundermann, H. 2007. Capitales, Estado Rentista y Cambio Social Atacameño en las Regiones Interiores de Antofagasta (1879–1928). Estudios Atacameños 34:113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanhueza, J., et al. 2004. Presentación y Comentario al Simposio Estado Actual de la Arqueología Histórica en Chile: Teoría y Métodos. Chungara 36:107–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006) The Uses of Heritage, RoutledgeLondon.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantaleán, H., Aguilar, M. (eds.) (2012) La Arqueología Social Latinoamericana: de la teoría a la praxis, Universidad de los AndesBogotá.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezub, J. 2009. Henry de La Vaulx en Patagonia (1896–1897): la historicidad escindida de la antropología colonial y la captura de corpus y cuerpos, Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. Debates. Sitio web. http://nuevomundo.revues.org/57810. Consultado el 18 febrero 2011.

  • Vilches, F. et al. (2012). Los subcontratistas de la pampa: asentamientos salitreros en el cantón Central, Región de Antofagasta (1880–1938). In Actas del XVII Congreso de Arqueología Chilena, Valparaíso, pp. 111–120.

  • Vilches, F., et al. 2008. Arqueología de Asentamientos Salitreros en la Región de Antofagasta (1880–1930): Síntesis y Perspectivas. Chungara 40(1):19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilches, F., et al. 2014a. La minería de la sal durante el siglo XX en San Pedro de Atacama, Chile (II Región): entre la explotación artesanal y la industrialización. Estudios Atacameños 48:2019–2228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilches, F., et al. 2014b. Arquitectura de Remeseros en San Pedro de Atacama. ARQ 88:76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. (2000) Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice, Altamira PressWalnut Creek.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Witmore, C. (2007) Landscape, Time, Topology: An account of the Southern Argolid Greece. In Landscapes in Archaeologypp. 194–225, edited by D Hicks, G Fairclough and L McAtackney, RoutledgeLondon.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, L. (2001) Usurping Native American Voice. In The future of the past: Archaeologists, Native Americans, and repatriationpp. 169–184, edited by T Bray, Garland PublishingNew York.,

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the community of San Pedro de Atacama for working with us throughout this journey. This research has been funded by FONDECYT Project 1120087.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Ayala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Notes

  1. 1.

    A project is presently underway to renovate the archaeological museum. It is being implemented jointly by the Undersecretary of Regional Development, the San Pedro Municipality, and the Universidad Católica del Norte. The project involves the replacement of the museum building that was constructed gradually by Le Paige in 1960 and following.

  2. 2.

    Energy resources such as firewood (algarrobo and chañar) were also extracted on a smaller scale (Green 2013).

  3. 3.

    These are other “human” entities from another time who will cause sickness among living humans if their rest is interrupted or they do not receive their ritual offerings. They are thus respected, feared, and not to be touched, and this is the reason why the Atacameño people object to the excavation of cemeteries and the display of human bodies.

  4. 4.

    It should be noted that unlike the previous instances, which were specifically focused on the local indigenous population, this one was oriented to the general public, especially children.

  5. 5.

    While as investigators we are not legally obligated, out of respect for and as an expression of good faith, as enshrined in Convention 169, we contacted the communities to inform them of what was being done on private properties located within traditional indigenous territory.

  6. 6.

    Fondecyt projects like ours assume a linear, well-defined timeline (in our case, 4 years) and include the preparation of annual academic reports in pre-established formats, evidence of the informed consent of those interviewed, the publication of articles in indexed journals (ISI, Scopus), the submission of biannual financial reports justifying expenditure of the funds allocated, and the education of undergraduate and graduate students.

  7. 7.

    We are referring to conversations with presidents of communities and/or assemblies in which our objectives were supported and methodological ideas were offered that coincided with our own proposals (make audiovisual recordings of older adults to preserve their testimonials; undertake a kinship study for the cattle-driving era and following; but above all, recover the stories/objects of the “forgotten” or better yet “postponed” 20th century).

  8. 8.

    When it was not possible to speak directly to the assemblies, we organized meetings with community leaders to present the results. These received the same positive response as the assembly presentations.

  9. 9.

    This methodology was implemented in similar contexts in the Saltpeter pampa (Vilches et al. 2012).

  10. 10.

    We are aware of the public objections that have been made to the Fondecyt bioethics committee by different social science scholars, particularly anthropologists.

  11. 11.

    The stories alluded to in this text come from a total of 9 informants interviewed in 2012 and another 6 interviewed in 1996–1998 and 2008–2010. The cattle-driving era is associated with a productive cycle that lasted until around the 1930s or 1940s; meanwhile, the salt, sulfur, and llareta industries were most active from the 1930s until the 1980s (or 1960s in the case of llareta).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vilches, F., Garrido, C., Ayala, P. et al. The Contemporary Past of San Pedro de Atacama, Northern Chile: Public Archaeology?. Arch 11, 372–399 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-015-9283-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-015-9283-x

Key words

Navigation