Skip to main content
Log in

Three Strands of Nothingness in Chinese Philosophy and the Kyoto School: A Summary and Evaluation

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of Nothingness—Japanese mu or Chinese 無—is central both to the Kyoto School (Kyōto gakuha 京都学派) and to important strands of Chinese philosophy. The Kyoto School, which has been active since the 1930s, is arguably modern Japan’s most philosophically sophisticated challenge to Western thought. Further, as contemporary East Asia continues to rise in importance, East Asians and Westerners alike are beginning to consider anew the contemporary philosophical relevance of Confucianism, Daoism, and East-Asian Buddhism. These originally Chinese traditions were certainly important influences directly and indirectly on Kyoto School philosophy itself. At the very least, Kyoto thought and Chinese thought share foundational structural resemblances, especially regarding the concept of Nothingness. This study summarizes the concept of Nothingness in the Kyoto School and in Chinese philosophy, and then offers an evaluation of the contemporary relevance and general coherence of this concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Analects. In Chinese Text Project. 2006–. Accessed December 15, 2013. http://www.ctext.org/analects/.

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33.124: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buri, Fritz. 1997. The Buddha-Christ as the Lord of the True Self. Trans. with an introduction by Harold H. Oliver. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.

  • Capra, Fritjof. 1975. The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism. Berkeley, CA: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalissier, Michel. 2009. “Nishida Kitarō and Chinese Philosophy.” In Facing the 21st Century (Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy 4), edited by Lam Wing-Keung and Cheung Ching-Yuen. Nagoya: Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture.

  • Daodejing 道德經. In Chinese Text Project. 2006–. Accessed December 15, 2013. http://www.ctext.org/dao-de-jing/.

  • Daxue 大學. In Chinese Text Project. 2006–. Accessed December 15, 2013. http://www.ctext.org/liji/da-xue/.

  • Hagakure 葉隱. Hagakure Online. 2011–2014. Accessed September 1, 2014. http://hagakure-text.jp/bunsho/0002.html

  • Horio, Tsutomu. 1998. “Gyakutaiō and Gyakuen: Nishida’s Philosophy, Nishitani’s Philosophy, and Zen.” In Zen Buddhism Today—Annual Report of the Kyoto School Zen Symposium, No. 15. Kyoto: The Kyoto Seminar for Religious Philosophy.

  • Imamichi, Tomonobu. 2004. In Search of Wisdom: One Philosopher’s Journey (LTCB International Library Selection, vol. 15). Trans. by Mary E. Foster. Tokyo: LTCB International Library Trust / International House of Japan.

  • Kalupahana, David J. 1976. Buddhist Philosophy: An Historical Analysis. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasulis, Thomas. 1979. “The Two Strands of Nothingness in Zen Buddhism.” International Philosophical Quarterly 19.1: 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Catherine. 1990. “Scoop Up the Water and the Moon is in Your Hands: On Feminist Theology and Dynamic Self-Emptying.” In The Emptying God: A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian Conversation, edited by John B. Cobb Jr. and Christopher Ives. New York: Orbis Books.

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarjuna. 1995. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika. Trans. by Jay L. Garfield. Oxford University Press.

  • Nishida, Kitarō 西田幾多郎. 1965–1966. The Complete Works of N ishida Kitarō 西田幾多郎全集, 19 vols. Tokyo 東京: Iwanami Shoten 岩波書店.

  • Nishitani, Keiji. 1965. “Science and Zen.” Eastern Buddhist 1.1: 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 1983. Religion and Nothingness. Translated from the original 宗教とは何か (1961), and with an introduction by Jan Van Bragt, foreword by Winston L. King. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Ozaki, Makoto. 1990. Introduction to the Philosophy of Tanabe. Atlanta: Rodopi Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, Graham. 1995. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, Shū 柴田秀. 2006. “Criticism of Tanabe Philosophy by Takizawa Katsumi: A Study of Tanabe Philosophy before World War II 滝沢克己の田辺哲学批判:戦前の田辺哲学に関する一考察.” Bulletin of the Nihon University Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies Information Research Department 日本大学大学院総合社会情報研究科紀要 7: 213–223.

  • Suares, Peter. 2011. The Kyoto School’s Takeover of Hegel: Nishida, Nishitani, and Tanabe Remake the Philosophy of Spirit. London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe, Hajime 田辺元. 1963–1964. The Complete Works of T anabe Hajime 田辺元全集, 15 vols. Tokyo 東京: Chikuma Shobô 筑摩書房.

  • Wargo, Robert J. J. 2005. The Logic of Nothingness: A Study of N ishida Kitarō. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongyong 中庸. In Chinese Text Project. 2006–. Accessed December 15, 2013. http://www.ctext.org/liji/zhong-yong/.

  • Zhuangzi 莊子. In Chinese Text Project. 2006–. Accessed December 15, 2013. http://www.ctext.org/zhuangzi/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis A. Rigsby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigsby, C.A. Three Strands of Nothingness in Chinese Philosophy and the Kyoto School: A Summary and Evaluation. Dao 13, 469–489 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9398-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9398-6

Keywords

Navigation