Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound Evaluation of Visceral and Subcutaneous Fat Reduction in Morbidly Obese Subjects Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Banding, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Prospective Comparison Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Visceral fat (VF) plays a major role in the development of metabolic syndrome associated with obesity. The aim of our study is to compare VF and subcutaneous fat (SCF) reduction measured by ultrasonography (US) after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

Methods

Thirty-nine morbidly obese patients were prospectively evaluated by US before surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery to determine VF and SCF thickness.

Results

Three statistically comparable groups of morbidly obese patients underwent LRYGB (n = 13), LSG (n = 15), and LAGB (n = 11). The three groups did not differ in initial age, gender, body mass index (BMI), VF, or SCF. Final excess weight loss (EWL%) was highest after LSG and LRYGB followed by LAGB (81 ± 5.8 vs. 69.5 ± 4.5 vs. 43.4 ± 5.2, p < 0.001). LSG and LRYGB were significantly more efficient in VF reduction (ΔVF) compared with LAGB (7.1 ± 0.5 vs. 5.6 ± 0.6 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.004). SCF reduction (ΔSCF) was also highest after LSG followed by LRYGB and LAGB (3 ± 0.2 vs. 2.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4, p = 0.08). The change in fat distribution, determined as Δ(VF/SCF), showed a preferential VF reduction in the LSG and LRYGB patients compared with patients that underwent LAGB (0.59 ± 0.1 vs. 0.52 ± 0.2 vs. 0.19 ± 0.2, p = 0.42). In a subgroup analysis comparing only LSG to LRYGB, no statistically significant difference was seen in EWL%, ΔVF, ΔSCF, or in fat distribution Δ(VF/SCF).

Conclusion

LSG and LRYGB show better preferential and overall VF reduction than LAGB. US may serve as a simple tool of evaluating postoperative fat distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

US:

Ultrasonography

VF:

Visceral fat

SCF:

Subcutaneous fat

LAGB:

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

LSG:

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

LRYGB:

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, Stevens J, VanItallie TB. Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA. 1999;282:1530–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet. 2005;366:1197–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjorntorp P. “Portal” adipose tissue as a generator of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:493–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahima RS, Flier JS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000;11:327–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjorntorp P. Metabolic implications of body fat distribution. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:1132–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frayn KN. Visceral fat and insulin resistance—causative or correlative? Br J Nutr. 2000;83(1):S71–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wajchenberg BL. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:697–738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider HJ, Glaesmer H, Klotsche J, Bohler S, Lehnert H, et al. Accuracy of anthropometric indicators of obesity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:589–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemieux I, Drapeau V, Richard D, Bergeron J, Marceau P, et al. Waist girth does not predict metabolic complications in severely obese men. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1417–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stolk RP, Meijer R, Mali WP, Grobbee DE, van der Graaf Y. Ultrasound measurements of intraabdominal fat estimate the metabolic syndrome better than do measurements of waist circumference. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:857–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SK, Park SW, Kim SH, Cha BS, Lee HC, et al. Visceral fat amount is associated with carotid atherosclerosis even in type 2 diabetic men with a normal waist circumference. Int J Obes. 2009;33:131–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossner S, Bo WJ, Hiltbrandt E, Hinson W, Karstaedt N, et al. Adipose tissue determinations in cadavers—a comparison between cross-sectional planimetry and computed tomography. Int J Obes. 1990;14:893–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Kooy K, Seidell JC. Techniques for the measurement of visceral fat: a practical guide. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993;17:187–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abate N, Garg A, Coleman R, Grundy SM, Peshock RM. Prediction of total subcutaneous abdominal, intraperitoneal, and retroperitoneal adipose tissue masses in men by a single axial magnetic resonance imaging slice. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:403–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu KH, Chan YL, Chan WB, Kong WL, Kong MO, et al. Sonographic measurement of mesenteric fat thickness is a good correlate with cardiovascular risk factors: comparison with subcutaneous and preperitoneal fat thickness, magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric indexes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:1267–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heath ML, Kow L, Slavotinek JP, Valentine R, Toouli J, et al. Abdominal adiposity and liver fat content 3 and 12 months after gastric banding surgery. Metab Clin Exp. 2009;58:753–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, Todesco T, Bergamo-Andreis IA, et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra-abdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;18:563–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ribeiro-Filho FF, Faria AN, Azjen S, Zanella MT, Ferreira SR. Methods of estimation of visceral fat: advantages of ultrasonography. Obes Res. 2003;11:1488–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pontiroli AE, Pizzocri P, Giacomelli M, Marchi M, Vedani P, et al. Ultrasound measurement of visceral and subcutaneous fat in morbidly obese patients before and after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comparison with computerized tomography and with anthropometric measurements. Obes Surg. 2002;12:648–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Lucia RE, Sleigh A, Finucane FM, Brage S, Stolk RP, et al. Ultrasound measurements of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal thickness to predict abdominal adiposity among older men and women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18:625–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Del Genio F, Del Genio G, De Sio I, Marra M, Alfonsi L, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of abdominal fat and liver changes following progressive weight loss in severely obese patients treated with laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1664–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pontiroli AE, Pizzocri P, Librenti MC, Vedani P, Marchi M, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid (grade 3) obesity and its metabolic complications: a three-year study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:3555–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Busetto L, Perini P, Giantin V, Valente P, Segato G, et al. Relationship between energy expenditure and visceral fat accumulation in obese women submitted to adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB). Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995;19:227–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Busetto L, Tregnaghi A, De Marchi F, Segato G, Foletto M, et al. Liver volume and visceral obesity in women with hepatic steatosis undergoing gastric banding. Obes Res. 2002;10:408–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Busetto L, Tregnaghi A, Bussolotto M, Sergi G, Beninca P, et al. Visceral fat loss evaluated by total body magnetic resonance imaging in obese women operated with laparascopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:60–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Djuric-Stefanovic A, Vasin D, Jovanovic S, Lazic L, Kovac J, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat tissue before and after bariatric surgery. Acta Chir Lugosl. 2013;60:25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Despres JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444:881–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vidal J, Ibarzabal A, Romero F, Delgado S, Momblan D, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome following sleeve gastrectomy in severely obese subjects. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1077–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1567–76.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jimenez A, Casamitjana R, Flores L, Viaplana J, Corcelles R, et al. Long-term effects of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus in morbidly obese subjects. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1023–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abbatini F, Rizzello M, Casella G, Alessandri G, Capoccia D, et al. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding on type 2 diabetes. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1005–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ernst B, Wilms B, Thurnheer M, Schultes B. Reduced circulating androgen levels after gastric bypass surgery in severely obese women. Obes Surg. 2013;23:602–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pellitero S, Olaizola I, Alastrue A, Martinez E, Granada ML, et al. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in morbidly obese males is reversed after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1835–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Botella-Carretero JI, Balsa JA, Gomez-Martin JM, Peromingo R, Huerta L, et al. Circulating free testosterone in obese men after bariatric surgery increases in parallel with insulin sensitivity. J Endocrinol Investig. 2013;36:227–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

All contributing authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report.

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ido Mizrahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizrahi, I., Beglaibter, N., Simanovsky, N. et al. Ultrasound Evaluation of Visceral and Subcutaneous Fat Reduction in Morbidly Obese Subjects Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Banding, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Prospective Comparison Study. OBES SURG 25, 959–966 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1495-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1495-4

Keywords

Navigation