Regulation of hESC Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper considers the legislative debates in Australia that led to the passage of the Research Involving Human Embryos Act (Cth 2002) and the Prohibition of Human Cloning Act (Cth 2002). In the first part of the paper, we discuss the debate surrounding the legislation with particular emphasis on the ways in which demands for public consultation, public debate and the education of Australians about the potential ethical and scientific impact of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) research were deployed, and the explicit and implicit framing of the scope of public consultation. We then ask whether, given the calls for public consultations, debate and understanding, current work in democratic theory could be helpful in analysing the process of policy-making in these areas. In particular, we canvass the literature relating to aggregative and deliberative models of democracy for processes that support the legitimacy of policy. We identify features of the debate that reflect the appeal of deliberative approaches as well as some of the possible hurdles or limitations to developing deliberative democratic approaches to policy in ethically contentious areas.
- Andrews, K. (chair) (2001). House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs. Human cloning: Scientific, ethical and regulatory aspects of human cloning and stem cell research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
- Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley & Sons, New York
- Scientific, ethical and regulatory considerations relevant to cloning human beings. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
- Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia. Australian Law Reform Commission, Sydney
- Benhabib, S. (2002) The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton University Press, Princeton
- Bohman, J. (1998) Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 6: pp. 400-425 CrossRef
- Proceed with care: Final report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Government of Canada, Ottawa
- Chalmers, D. (2002) Professional self-regulation and guidelines in assisted reproduction. Journal of Law and Medicine 9: pp. 414-428
- Council of Australian Governments (COAG). Communique of meeting held on June 8, 2001. [Cited 2006 April 24]. Available from: http://coag.gov.au/meetings/080601/index.htm.
- COAG. Communique of meeting held on April 5, 2002. [Cited 2006 April 24]. Available from: http://coag.gov.au/meetings/050402/index.htm
- Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
- Elster, J. Introduction. In: Elster, J. eds. (1998) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-18
- Fishkin, J. S. Deliberative democracy. In: Simon, R. L. eds. (2002) The Blackwell guide to social and political philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 221-238
- Fishkin, J. S. (1995) The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven
- Gambetta, D. ‘Claro!’: An essay on discursive machismo. In: Elster, J. eds. (1998) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-43
- GenEthics Network. Submission to the Senate Committee on the bill to regulate research involving embryos, October 2002. [Cited 2005 May 14]. Available from http://www.geneethics.org/community/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=21.
- Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. Deliberative democracy beyond process. In: Fishkin, J. S., Laslett, P. eds. (2003) Debating deliberative democracy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 31-53
- Habermas, J. (1975) Legitimation crisis. Beacon, Boston
- Habermas, J. Three normative models of democracy. In: Benhabib, S. eds. (1996) Democracy and difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 21-30
- Hall, W. (2004) The Australian policy debate about human embryonic stem cell research. Health Law Review 12: pp. 27-33
- Harvey, O. (2005) Regulating stem-cell research and human cloning in an Australian context: An exercise in protecting the status of the human subject. New Genetics and Society 24: pp. 125-136 CrossRef
- Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge, New York
- Knowles, S. (chair) (2002). The Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. Provisions of the Research involving Human Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Bill 2002 [Selection of Bills Committee of Inquiry]. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
- Lockhart, J. S. (chair) (2005). Legislation Review Committee. Issues paper: outline of existing legislation and issues for public consultation [Legislation Review of Australia's Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 and Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002]. Canberra: Biotext.
- Mansbridge, J. (1980) Beyond adversary democracy. Basic Books, New York
- Miller, D. Deliberative democracy and social choice. In: Fishkin, J. S., Laslett, P. eds. (2003) Debating deliberative democracy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 182-199
- Ethical guidelines on assisted reproductive technology. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
- National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
- Nicol, D., Chalmers, D., Gogarty, B. (2002) Regulating biomedical advances: Embryonic stem cell research. Macquarie Law Journal 2: pp. 31-59
- Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Basic Books, New York
- Sunstein, C. R. The law of group polarization. In: Fishkin, J. S., Laslett, P. eds. (2003) Debating deliberative democracy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 80-101
- Tate, M. (chair) (1986). Senate Select Committee on the Human Embryo Experimentation Bill 1985, Parliament of Australia. Human embryo experimentation in Australia. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
- Waldron, J. (1993) Liberal rights: Collected papers 1981–1991. Cambridge University Press, New York
- Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
- Young, I. M. (2000) Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press, New York
- Regulation of hESC Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume 3, Issue 1-2 , pp 95-107
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Stem cell transplantation
- Embryo research
- Public policy
- Industry Sectors