Skip to main content
Log in

Cold Model-Based Investigations to Study the Effects of Operational and Nonoperational Parameters on the Ruhrstahl–Heraeus Degassing Process

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The circulation rate of steel is known to play a vital role in the superlative performance of the Ruhrstahl–Heraeus (RH) degasser. Numerous experiments were conducted on a physical model for the RH degassing process, which was established at IEHK, RWTH-Aachen University. The model was developed with a scale ratio of 1:3 to study the RH process. This study is conducted to show the effects of operational and nonoperational parameters on the circulation rate of liquid water in the model. The effects of lift gas flow rate, submerged depth of snorkels, water level in vessel, etc. on the circulation rate are studied. The mixing characteristics are studied with the help of current conductivity experiments for different lift gas flow rates and water levels in the vacuum vessel. Finally, the relationship between dimensionless numbers is derived with the help of the experimental data obtained from the cold model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ν :

Velocity of water through the down leg, m/s

g :

Acceleration due to gravity, m/s2

d :

Diameter of the down leg, m

ρ :

Density of liquid used, kg/m3

μ :

Viscosity of the liquid used, kg/ms

G :

Lift gas flow rate, NL/min (0.167 * 10−4 m3/s)

x, y :

Coefficients of the equation

Fr :

Froude number

Re :

Reynolds number

V a :

Ratio of lift gas flow rate to the circulation flow rate

C :

Constant of proportionality

\( v_{\text{p}} ,v_{\text{m}} \) :

Velocity of liquid steel and water in industrial unit and model, respectively, m/s

\( d_{\text{p}} ,d_{\text{m}} \) :

Diameter of the down leg for industrial unit and model, respectively, m

\( G_{\text{p}} ,G_{\text{m}} \) :

Lift gas flow rate for industrial unit and model, respectively, NL/min (0.167 *10−4 m3/s)

\( Fr^{\prime} \) :

Modified Froude number

\( u, u_{\text{p}} , u_{\text{m}} \) :

Velocity of gas in general and velocities of gas for industrial unit and model, respectively, NL/min (0.167 * 10−4 m3/s)

\( \rho_{\text{g}} \) :

Density of gas, kg/m3

\( \rho_{\text{l}} \) :

Density of liquid used, kg/m3

\( f, f_{\text{p}} , f_{\text{m}} \) :

Orifice diameter in general and orifice diameters for industrial unit and model respectively, m

\( \rho_{{{\text{g}}_{\text{p}} }} \) :

Density of argon gas, kg/m3

\( \rho_{{{\text{g}}_{\text{m}} }} \) :

Density of nitrogen gas, kg/m3

\( \rho_{{{\text{l}}_{\text{p}} }} \) :

Density of liquid steel, kg/m3

\( \rho_{{{\text{l}}_{\text{m}} }} \) :

Density of liquid water, kg/m3

\( v^{\prime} \) :

Velocity of water at any point, m/s

\( p^{\prime} \) :

Pressure corresponding to the velocity V at any point, mbar (102 Pa)

\( \bar{v}^{\prime} \) :

Mean velocity, m/s

h sub :

Submerged depth of snorkels, mm (10−3 m)

h vac :

Water level in vacuum vessel, mm (10−3 m)

p vac :

Vacuum pressure, mbar (102 Pa)

Q cir :

Circulation Rate, L/min (0.167 * 10−4 m3/s)

h′:

Distance between the height of water in vessel and the point corresponding to the submerged depth, mm (10−3  m)

References

  1. M.A. Van Ende, Y.M. Kim, M.K. Cho, J. Choi, and I.H. Jung: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2011, vol. 42B, pp. 477–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Kuwabara, K. Umezawa, K. Mori, and H. Watanabe: Trans. ISIJ, 1988, vol. 28 (4), pp. 305–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Seshadri and S.L. De Souza Costa: Trans. ISIJ, 1986, vol. 26, pp. 133–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Seshadri, C.A. da Silva, I.A. da Silva, G.A. Vargas, and P.S.B. Lascosqui: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2006, vol. 33, pp. 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Li, X. Ai, N. Wang, and N. Lv: Trans Tech Publications, 2011, vols. 287–290, pp. 840–43.

  6. L. Lin, Y. Bao, F. Yue, L. Zhang, and H. Ou: Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater., 2011, vol. 19, pp. 483–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ain A. Sonin: The Physical Basis of Dimensional Analysis, 2nd ed., MIT, Cambridge, 2001, pp. 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Ji-He: J. Shanghai Univ. (English Ed.), 2003, vol. 7 (1), pp. 1–17.

  9. G. Yang, X. Wang, F. Huang, W. Wang, and Y. Yin: Steel Res. Int., 2014, vol. 85, pp. 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Yang, F. Tang, and M. Shen: TELKOMNIKA, 2015, vol. 13, pp. 670–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O.J.H.H. Rakotobe and Dieter G. Senk: Untersuchungen zum Einschlusswachstum und zur Einschlussentfernung während der Pfannen- und RH-Vakuumbehandlung, IEHK, RWTH–Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 2009, pp. 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank IEHK, RWTH Aachen University, Germany, especially Mr. Hasim Fetahi, and IIT Madras for their support and help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepjyoti Mukherjee.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted August 11, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, D., Shukla, A.K. & Senk, D.G. Cold Model-Based Investigations to Study the Effects of Operational and Nonoperational Parameters on the Ruhrstahl–Heraeus Degassing Process. Metall Mater Trans B 48, 763–771 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0877-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0877-5

Keywords

Navigation