Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consolidation of nanostructured metal powders by rapid forging: Processing, modeling, and subsequent mechanical behavior

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fe-10Cu powders containing 20-nm grains were produced by attritor milling of elemental powders in argon. A rapid powder forging technique was developed to consolidate the powders into fully dense compacts while maintaining nanoscale grain sizes. Grain growth during the consolidation was controlled by reducing the time of exposure at elevated temperature to a few minutes or less, a technique which is applicable to all materials and does not necessitate the addition of dispersoids. This was achieved by heating green compacts quickly using an induction heater, and then forging and rapidly cooling them back to room temperature. Forging was conducted in a protective argon atmosphere to limit contamination. Fully dense compacts were produced at relatively low temperatures, mainly due to the accelerated creep rates exhibited by the nanostructures. Transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis found an average grain size of 45 nm in the fully dense samples forged at 530 °C. Indications are that finer grain sizes should be attainable by using slightly lower temperatures and higher pressures. The success of the technique (compared to hot-isostatic pressing (“hipping”)) is due to both reducing time at elevated temperatures and applying relatively high pressures. Microhardness tests revealed a significant strengthening effect due to grain size refinement, following a Hall-Petch relation. Compression testing at room temperature showed no strain hardening during plastic deformation, which occurred by shear banding. High strengths, up to 1800 MPa, were obtained at room temperature. Compression testing at 575 °C revealed a significant strain rate dependence of mechanical behavior and also the possibility of superplastic behavior. Power-law creep was observed at 575 °C, with very high steady-state creep rates on the order of 50 pct/s at 230 MPa. The consolidation process was successfully modeled by slightly modifying and applying the Arzt, Ashby, and Easterling (AAE) hot-isostatic press (HIP) model. The experiments and modeling indicated that creep was the dominant densification mechanism in these materials, even at relatively low temperatures and high loading rates. The results of this investigation suggest the possibility of a commercially viable nanostructured metal, which is easily processed to large strains at moderate temperatures, yet maintains high strength at room temperature without the necessity of heat treatment or mechanical working.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Gleiter: Progr. Mater. Sci., 1989, vol. 33, pp. 223–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R.W. Siegel: NanoStr. Mater., 1993, vol. 3, pp. 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Birringer: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1989, vol. A117, pp. 33–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Gleiter: NanoStr. Mater., 1995, vol. 6, pp. 3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C.C. Koch: in Materials Science and Technology, R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen, and E.J. Kramer, eds., VCH, Weinheim, 1991, vol. 15, pp. 193–245.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Eckert, J.C. Holzer, C.E. Krill III, and W.L. Johnson: J. Appl. Phys., 1993, vol. 73, pp. 2794–2802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Jain and T. Christman: Acta Metall., 1994, vol. 42, pp. 1901–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.A. Morris and D.G. Morris: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1989, vol. A111, pp. 115–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.E. Carsley, W.W. Milligan, S.A. Hackney, and E.C. Aifantis: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1995, vol. 26A, pp. 2479–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. He and E. Ma: J. Mater. Res., 1996, vol. 11, pp. 72–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. He and E. Ma: NanoStr. Mater., 1996, vol. 7, pp. 327–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM Standard C20-92, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1996, vol. 15.01, pp. 5–7.

  13. A. Guinier: X-Ray Diffraction in Crystals, Imperfect Crystals, and Amorphous Bodies, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY, 1963, pp. 121 and 240–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.E. Warren: X-Ray Diffraction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969, p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W.F. Hosford and R.M. Caddell: Metal Forming, Mechanics and Metallurgy, 2nd ed., PTR Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993, pp. 122–29.

    Google Scholar 

  16. AISI Committee on Hot Rolled and Cold Finished Bar Products: Principles of Forging Design, American Iron and Steel Institute, New York, NY, 1965, pp. 10–11.

  17. J. Eckert, J.C. Holzer, and W.L. Johnson: Scripta Metall., 1992, vol. 27, pp. 1105–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Eckert, J.C. Holzer, and W.L. Johnson: J. Appl. Phys., 1993, vol. 73, pp. 131–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R.A. Jago and N. Hansen: Acta Metall., 1986, vol. 34, pp. 1711–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.E. Carsley, J. Ning, W.W. Milligan, S.A. Hackney, and E.C. Aifantis: NanoStr. Mater., 1995, vol. 5, pp. 441–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Tabor: The Hardness of Metals, Oxford University Press, London, 1951, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Pilling and N. Ridley: Superplasticity in Crystalline Solids, The Institute of Metals, London, 1989, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T.H. Courtney: Mechanical Behavior of Materials, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1990, (a) p. 300 and (b) pp. 263–90.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Hahn, J. Logas, and R.S. Averback: J. Mater. Res., 1990, vol. 5, pp. 609–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Ke, S.A. Hackney, W.W. Milligan, and E.C. Aifantis: NanoStr. Mater., 1995, vol. 5, pp. 689–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Shima and M. Oyane: Int. Mech. Sci., 1976, vol. 18, pp. 285–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. E. Artz, M.F. Ashby, and K.E. Esterling: Metall. Trans. A, 1983, vol. 14A, pp. 211–21.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A.S. Helle, K.E. Esterling, and M.F. Ashby: Acta Metall., 1985, vol. 33, pp. 2163–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. D.S. Wilkinson and M.F. Ashby: Acta. Metall., 1975, vol. 23, pp. 1277–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. S.J. Mashl: Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H.A. Kuhn and C.A. Downey: Int. J. Powder Metall., 1971, vol. 7, pp. 15–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Computer program available at http://www.mm.mtu.edu/~milligan/research.

  33. H.J. Frost and M.F. Ashby: Deformation-Mechanism Maps, Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1982, (a) pp. 6–16, (b) p. 21, and (c) pp. 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaik, G.R., Milligan, W.W. Consolidation of nanostructured metal powders by rapid forging: Processing, modeling, and subsequent mechanical behavior. Metall Mater Trans A 28, 895–904 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-997-0077-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-997-0077-7

Keywords

Navigation