Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The potential contribution of wildlife sanctuary to forest conservation: A case study from binsar wildlife sanctuary

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest vegetation of a protected area (Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary) in Kumaun region (west Himalaya) was analysed for structure, composition and representativeness across three different altitudinal belts, lower (1,600–1,800 m a.s.l.), middle (1,900–2,100 m a.s.l.) and upper (2,200–2,400 m a.s.l.) during 2009–2011 using standard phytosociological methods. Four aspects (east, west, north and south) in each altitudinal belt were chosen for sampling to depict maximum representation of vegetation in the sanctuary. Population structure and regeneration behaviour was analysed seasonally for two years to show the establishment and growth of tree species. A total of 147 plant species were recorded from the entire region of which 27 tree species were selected for detailed study. Highest number was recorded at upper (18 species), and lowest at lower altitudinal belt (15 species). The relative proportion of species richness showed higher contribution of tree layer at each altitudinal belt. The population structure, based on the number of individuals, revealed a greater proportion of seedling layer at each altitudinal belt. The relative proportion of seedlings increases significantly along altitudinal belts (p<0.05) while opposite trends were observed in sapling and tree layers. The density of sapling and seedling species varied non-significantly across seasons (p>0.05). The density values decreased in summer and increased during rainy season. As far as the regeneration status is concerned, middle and upper altitudinal belts showed maximum number of species with fair regeneration as compared to lower altitudinal belt. Overall density diameter distribution of tree species showed highest species density and richness in the smallest girth class and decreased in the succeeding girth classes. This study suggests that patterns of regeneration behaviour would determine future structural and compositional changes in the forest communities. It is suggested that the compositional changes vis-à-vis role of ‘New’ and ‘Not regenerating’ species need priority attention while initiating conservation activities in the sanctuary. This study calls for exploring other less explored Wildlife Sanctuaries in the Himalaya and across the world, to achieve overall biodiversity status in these protected areas and thus to justify their role in conserving biodiversity in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad I, Ahmad MSA, Hussain M, et al. (2010) Spatiotemporal aspects of plant community structure in open scrub rangelands of submountainous Himalayan plateaus. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42(5): 3431–3440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksamit SE, Irving FD (1984) Prescribed burning for lowland black spruce regeneration in Northern Minnesota. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14:107–113. Doi: 10.1139/x84-020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP, Gaywood M (1994) Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 473–482. DOI: 10.2307/3235973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baduni NP, Sharma CM (2001) Population structure and community analysis on different aspects of Sal savanna forest type in outer Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Forester 127(9): 1001–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barik SK, Rao P, Tripathi RS, et al. (1996) Dynamics of tree seedling population in a humid subtropical forest of northeast India as related to disturbances. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 584–589. DOI: 10.1139/x26-067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari BS (2003) Blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) forest stands of Garhwal Himalaya: Composition, population structure and diversity. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 15(1): 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuyan P, Khan, ML, Tripathi RS (2003) Tree diversity and population structure in undisturbed and human-impacted stands of tropical wet evergreen forest in Arunachal Pradesh. Eastern Himalayas India. Biodiversity and Conservation 12(8): 1753–1773. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023619017786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring LR, Monk CD, Swank WT (1981) Early regeneration of a clear cut southern Appalachian forest. Ecology 62: 1244–1253. DOI: 10.2307/1937289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt CA, Rickard WH (1994) Alien taxa in the North American shrub steppe four decades after cessation of livestock grazing and cultivation agriculture. Biological Conservation 68: 95–106. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90339-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown Peter M, Bhattacharyya A, Santosh Shah K (2011) Research report potential for developing fire histories in chir pine (pinus roxburghii) forests in the Himalayan foothills. Tree-Ring Research 67(1): 57–62. DOI: 10.3959/2009-15.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) General Silviculture for India. Manager of Publications, Delhi, Govt. of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell HV, Lawton JH (1992) Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 1–12. D$oi: 10.2307/5503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criddle RS, Church JN, Smith BN, et al. (2003) Fundamental causes of the global patterns of species range and richness. Russ J Plant Physiol. Russian Journal Plant Physiology 50: 192–199. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022969029867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1950) The interrelation of certain analytic and systematic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31: 434–455. DOI:10.2307/1931497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar U, Rawal RS, Samant SS (1997) Structural diversity and representativeness of forest vegetation in a protected area of Kumaun Himalaya, India: Implication for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 1045–1062. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018375932740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar U, Rawal RS, Samant SS (1998) Wild plant resources and use pattern in Askot Wildlife Sanctuary of Kumaun in the Indian Himalaya: Manifestations of commonness and rarity. In: Kotwal PC, Banerjee S (eds.) Biodiversity Conservation in Managed Forest and Protected areas. Agro Botanica, Bikaner. pp. 128–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espelta JM, Riba M, Retana J (1995) Patterns or seedling recruitment in host-Mediterranean Quercus ilex forests influenced by canopy development. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 465–472. DOI: 10.2307/3236344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991) Plant litter - Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Botanical Review 57(1): 1–32. DOI: 10.1007/BF02858763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gairola S, Rawal RS, Todaria NP (2008) Forest vegetation patterns along an altitudinal gradient in sub-alpine zone of west Himalaya, India. African Journal of Plant Science 2(6): 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain MS, Sultana A, Khan JA (2000) A Study of Threats to Biodiversity Conservation of Middle Altitude Oak Forest in Kumaon Himalaya. Final Technical Report MoEF, Department of Wildlife Sciences, A.M.U., Aligarh, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain MS, Sultana A, Khan JA, et al. (2008) Species composition and community structure of forest stands in Kumaon Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Tropical Ecology 49(2): 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity: The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1086/419325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt LP (2001) Low seed availability may limit recruitment in grazed Atriplex vesicaria and contribute to its local extinction. Plant Ecology 157(1): 53–67. Doi:10.1023/a:1014515122231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora of the alpine zone. New Phytologist 11: 37–50. Doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP (2004) Indigenous uses and structure of Chir pine forest in Uttaranchal Himalaya, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 11: 205–210. Doi:10.1080/13504500409469824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan ML, Rai JPN, Tripathi RS (1987) Population structure of some tree species in disturbed and protected sub-tropical forests of north-east India. Acta Oecologica-Oecologia Applicata 8(3): 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan ML, Tripathi RS (1989) Effects of stump diameter, stump height and sprout density on the sprout growth of four tree species in burnt and unburnt forest plots. Acta Oecologica 10(4): 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharkwal G (2009) Qualitative analysis of tree species in evergreen forests of Kumaun Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. African Journal of Plant Science 3(3): 049–052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khumbongmayum AD, Khan ML, Tripathi RS (2006) Biodiversity conservation in sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India: population structure and regeneration status of woody species. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 2439–2456. DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-6901-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korner C (1998) A re-assessment of high elevation treeline positions and their explanation. Oecologia 115: 445–459. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal M, Samant SS (2010) Floristic Diversity of the Kais Wildlife Sanctuary in Himachal Pradesh, North-Western Himalaya. In: Tewari LM, Pangtey YPS, Tewari G (eds.) Biodiversity Potentials of the Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, Uttrakhand, India. pp. 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman D, Li M (1992) Seedling recruitment patterns in a tropical dry forest in Ghana. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 375–382. DOI: 10.2307/3235763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald IAW, Loope LL, Usher MB, et al. (1989) Wildlife conservation and the invasion of nature reserves by introduced species: a global perspective. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, et al. (eds.) Biological invasion: a global perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. pp. 215–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Rao KS, et al. (2000) Analysis and resolution of protected area-people conflicts in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environmental Conservation 27(1): 43–53. Doi: http://dx.doi.org.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majila BS, Joshi GC, Kala CP (2005) Pattern in litter fall and litter decomposition along altitudinal gradient in the Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary, Central Himalaya. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 12: 205–212. DOI: 10.1080/13504500509469631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majila BS, Kala CP (2010) Forest structure and regeneration along the altitudinal gradient in the Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Russian Journal of Ecology 41(1): 75–83. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413610010157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK (1993) Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecological Monographs 63: 327–366. DOI: 10.2307/2937150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra BP, Tripathi RS, Tripathi OP, Pandey HN (2003) Effects of disturbance on the regeneration of four dominant and economically important woody species in a broad-leaved subtropical humid forest of Meghalaya, north east India. Current Science 84(11): 1449–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi SS (1995) Uttarakhand: Land and People. MD Publications PVT LTD, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi VS, Maikhuri RK, Rawat LS (2012) Paradigm and Ecological Implication of Changing Agricultural Land-use: a Case Study from Govind Wildlife Sanctuary, Central Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 9: 547–557. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-012-2216-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1990) Forest Stand dynamics. Government document, McGraw Hill, Inc. New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant S, Samant SS (2008) Population Ecology of the Endangered Himalayan Yew in Khokhan Wildlife Sanctuary of North Western Himalaya for Conservation Management. Journal of Mountain Science 5: 257–264. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-008-0078-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perira JS, Kozlwski TT (1977) Water relations and drought resistance or young Pinus banksiana and pinus resinosa plantation trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7: 132–137. DOI: 10.1139/x77-019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purohit A, Maikhuri RK, Rao KS, et al. (2002) Revitalizing drink: An assessment of traditional knowledge system in Bhotiya community of central Himalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 1(1): 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana Man S, Samant SS (2010) Threat categorization and conservation prioritization of floristic diversity in the Indian Himalayan Region: a state of art approach from Manali Wildlife Sanctuary. Journal for Nature Conservation 18(3): 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PB (1988) Effects or environmental factors on germination and seedling growth in Quercus floribunda and Cupressus torulosa, tree species of central Himalaya. Annals of Botany 61: 531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahni KC (1990) Gymnosperms of India and adjacent countries. Bishen Singh and Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS, Rawal RS, Dhar U (1995) Epiphytic orchids of Askot Wildlife Sanctuary in Kumaun Himalaya, India: Conservation imperatives. Environmental Conservation 22(1): 71–74. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892900034111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS, Dhar U, Rawal RS (1998) Biodiversity status of a protected area of West Himalaya. Askot Wildlife Sanctuary. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 5: 193–203. DOI: 10.1080/13504509809469983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS, Rawal RS, Dhar U (2006) Diversity, extraction and status of fodder species in Askot Wildlife Sanctuary, West Himalaya, India. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 2: 29–42. DOI: 10.1080/17451590609618097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena AK, Singh JS (1984) Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forests and implications concerning the future composition. Vegetatio 58: 61–69. DOI: 10.1007/BF00044928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte PJ, Marshall PE (1983) Growth and water relations of black locust and Pine seedlings exposed to controlled waterstress. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13: 334–338. DOI: 10.1139/x83-047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semwal RL, Mehta JP (1996) Ecology of forest fires in chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests of Garhwal Himalaya. Current Science 70: 426–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar U (2001) A case study of high tree diversity in a sa1 (Shorea robusta)-Dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: Floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science 81: 776–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Rawat GS (2011) Ethnomedicinal survey of Kedarnath WLS in Western Himalaya, India. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 1(1): 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS, Rawat YS, Chaturvedi SP (1984) Replacement of Oak forest with Pine in the Himalaya affects the nitrogen cycle. Nature 311: 54–56. DOI: 10.1038/311054a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RS, Rahlan PK, Singh SP (1987) Phytosociological and population structure of mixed Oak conifer forest in a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Environmental Ecology 5: 475–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Adhikari BS, Zobel DB (1994) Biomass productivity, leaf longevity and forest structure in the central Himalaya. Ecological Monograph 64: 401–421. DOI:10.2307/2937143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Singh JS (1986) Structure and function of the central Himalayan Oak forest. Indian National Science Academy, Conference proceedings, Vol. 96, India. pp. 159–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Singh JS (1987) Forest vegetation of the Himalaya. Botanical Review 53: 80–192. DOI:10.1007/BF02858183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurr SH, Barnes BV (1980) Forest Ecology. John Wiley, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R, Suresh HS, Dattaraja HS, et al. (1998) Dynamics of a tropical deciduous forest: Population changes (1988 through 1993) in a 50-hectare plot at Mudumalai, southern India. In: Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds.) Forest Biodiversity Research-Monitoring and Modeling, Conceptual Background to Old World Case Studies. Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth, Lancashire, UK pp. 529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaine MD, Lieberman D, Hall JB (1990) Structure and dynamics in a tropical dry forest in Ghana. Vegetatio 88: 31–51. DOI: 10.1007/BF00032601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todaria NP, Pokhriyal P, Uniyal P, et al. (2010) Regeneration status of tree species in forest of Phakot and Pathri Rao watersheds in Garhwal Himalaya. Current Science 98(2): 171–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo M, Poorter L, Claros PM, et al. (2011). Climate is a stronger driver of tree and forest growth rates than soil and disturbance. Journal of Ecology 99: 254–264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01741.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi RS, Khan ML (1990) Effects of seed weight and microsite characteristics on germination and seedlings fitness in two species of Quercus in a subtropical wet hill forest. Oikos 57: 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troup RS (1921) The silviculture of Indian trees. Clarendon Press, Volumes 1–3, Oxford, UK. pp. 1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Liang YH, Ren B, et al. (2004) Age structure of Picea schrenkiana forest along an altitudinal gradient in the central Tianshan Mountains, north-western China. Forest Ecology and Management 196(2–3): 267–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welden CW, Hewett SW, Hubbell SP, et al. (1991) Sapling survival, growth and recruitment: relationship to canopy height in a neotropical forest. Ecology 72: 35–50. DOI: 10.2307/1938900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, 263643, Uttarakhand, India

    Balwant Rawat & Vikram S. Negi

  2. Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, Molecular Taxonomy, Botany Division, Dehradun, 248005, Uttarakhand, India

    Janhvi Mishra Rawat

  3. Department of Botany, D.S.B. Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, 263001, Uttarakhand, India

    Lalit M. Tewari

  4. Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, Forest Ecology and Environment Division, Dehradun, 248005, Uttarakhand, India

    Laxmi Rawat

Authors
  1. Balwant Rawat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vikram S. Negi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Janhvi Mishra Rawat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lalit M. Tewari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laxmi Rawat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balwant Rawat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rawat, B., Negi, V.S., Mishra Rawat, J. et al. The potential contribution of wildlife sanctuary to forest conservation: A case study from binsar wildlife sanctuary. J. Mt. Sci. 10, 854–865 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2514-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2514-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation