To the Editors:—We applaud the work by Callen et al.,1 as it highlights a tremendous patient safety issue. As hospitalists, one of our greatest concerns has been the potential neglect in the ambulatory setting of the incidental radiological findings identified in hospitalized patients. The fact that these findings are not the center of attention during the hospital stay makes these findings less likely to be addressed in the medical chart, discussed with the patient, or communicated to the next provider to assure appropriate follow-up.
We evaluated the prevalence of such incidental radiological finding in a cohort of 720 patients that included 371 men and 349 women, with a mean age of 61 ± 19.8 years and 63.0 ± 20.7 years, respectively. The number of radiological examinations in these patients included 663 (92.1 %) x-rays of the chest or abdomen, 330 (45.8 %) computed tomography imaging (CT) scans of chest or abdomen/pelvis, 142 (19.7 %) ultrasounds of abdomen or kidneys, and 19 (2.6 %) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the abdomen.
An alarming 35.2 % of abdominal or chest CTs revealed incidental radiological findings that required outpatient follow-up. The most common finding was pulmonary nodules, which accounted for 50.4 % of the total. The distribution of the size of the pulmonary nodules was < 5 mm (45.2 %), 5–9 mm (30.1 %), and > 10 mm (24.7 %). Thyroid nodules and adrenal nodules were the second most common incidental finding, at 14 % each. Less common incidental radiological findings on CT included aortic aneurysm (12.4 %), liver lesions (7.0 %), pancreatic lesions (2.3 %), and splenic lesions (2.3 %). The prevalence of incidental findings on ultrasound of the abdomen was lower, affecting 5.6 % of patients (eight patients). Identification of incidental findings in patients undergoing chest and a bdominal x-ray was found to be only 1.9 % (13 patients). Patients with incidental radiological findings were more likely to be older and smokers.
Our findings demonstrate a significant number of incidental radiological findings in hospitalized general medicine patients that require post-discharge follow-up in the ambulatory setting. Given the high number of such incidental findings and that they are not the focus of the hospitalization, a systems approach to the communication of these findings is much needed.2
REFERENCES
Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Georgiou A, et al. Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1334–1348.
Balaban RB, Williams MV. Improving care transitions: hospitalists partnering with primary care. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(7):375–377.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gavi, S., Ranpura, V., Hapani, S. et al. Test Results Follow-Up: A Systematic Review. J GEN INTERN MED 28, 175 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2281-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2281-4