Skip to main content
Log in

Acid and Enzyme-Aided Collagen Extraction from the Byssus of Chilean Mussels (Mytilus Chilensis): Effect of Process Parameters on Extraction Performance

  • SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
  • Published:
Food Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovery of high-added-value compounds from seafood waste is a promising area of research. Mussel byssus is a by-product from mussel production for human consumption, which is a potential source of collagen. The goal of this study was to extract collagen from the byssus of Chilean mussel using two methods (acidic and enzymatic) and determine their extraction yields. Acidic extraction was performed by immersing the byssus into distilled water adjusted to pH 4 with HCl at two extraction temperatures (60 or 80 °C) and times (6 or 24 h). For enzymatic extraction, first an enzymatic hydrolysis at two times (4 or 24 h) and pepsin/substrate ratios (1:50 or 4:50) was done. Then, the extraction was conducted at 80 °C for 24 h. All samples were analyzed for total protein, amino acid profile and molecular weight of collagen extracts. Extraction time and temperature had significant effects (p < 0.05) on protein and hydroxyproline contents after acidic extraction, where the higher level of process parameters (80 °C and 24 h) gave the highest protein (6 mg/mL) and hydroxyproline (7.6 mg/g protein) values. Using an enzymatic step before extraction, an increase in protein and hydroxyproline contents was observed, with maximum values of 31 mg/mL and 32 mg/g protein, respectively. The enzyme extraction presented the higher extraction yield, values ranging from 3.86 to 7.56 %. Electrophoretic patterns of collagen presented only β and γ bands, suggesting that this collagen is highly cross-linked at the telopeptide region. These results indicate that the Chilean mussel byssus is a good source of collagen that can be extracted for different purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Nagai, N. Suzuki, Food Chem. 68, 277–281 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Wasswa, J. Tang, X. Gu, Food Rev Int 23, 159–174 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Ferraro, B.I. Cruz, J. Ferreira, F.X. Malcata, M.E. Pintado, P.M.L. Castro, Food Res Int 43, 2221–233 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Garcia-Sifuentes, R. Pacheco-Aguilar, M. Lugo-Sánchez, G. Garcia-Sánchez, J.C. Ramirez-Suarez, F. Garcia-Carreño, Food Chem. 114, 197–203 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. I.S. Arvanitoyannis, A. Kassaveti, Int J Food Sci Tech 43, 726–745 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.M. Lucas, E. Vaccaro, J.H. Waite, J Exp Biol 205, 1807–1817 (2002)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S.L. Brazee, E. Carrington, Bio Bull 211, 263–274 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X. Qin, J.H. Waite, J Exp Biol 198, 633–644 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. E.A. Foegeding, T.C. Lanier, H.O. Hultin, in Food Chemistry, ed. by O.W. Fennema, 3rd edn. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996), p. 902

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Stevens (2010). In Food Stabilizers, Thickeners and Gelling Agents, ed. By A. Imeson (Blackwell Publishing Limited, Oxford, 2010), p. 116

  11. D.A. Ledward, in Handbook of Hydrocolloids, ed. by G.O. Phillips, P.A. Williams (Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, 2000), p. 67

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Vidal. Global and Chilean trends in mussel culture. (V International Conference AQUA Sur, 2010), http://www.aqua-surconference.cl/

  13. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. (AOAC International, Washington, 1995).

  14. P. Janssen, J. van Nispen, P. Melgers, H. van den Bogaart, R. Hamelinck, B. Goverde, Chromatographia 22, 345–350 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Ahmad, S. Benjakul, S. Nalinanon, Food Hydrocolloid 24, 588–594 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M.S. Bharati, K. Ramalingam, P Indian Nat Sci Academy 1, 23–26 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Mizuta, J. Hwang, R. Yoshinaka, Food Chem. 76, 53–58 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Zhou, J.M. Regenstain, J Food Sci 70, C392–C396 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Shon, J.H. Eo, S.J. Hwang, J.B. Eun, Food Sci Biotechnol 20, 99–106 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Nagai, E. Yamashita, K. Taniguchi, N. Kanamori, N. Suzuki, Food Chem. 75, 425–429 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Jongjareonrak, S. Benjakul, W. Visessanguan, T. Nagai, M. Tanaka, Food Chem. 93, 475–484 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. H.Y. Liu, D. Li, S.D. Guo, Food Chem. 101, 621–625 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Ahmad, S. Benjakul, Food Chem. 120, 817–824 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Y.R. Huang, C.Y. Shiau, H.H. Chen, B.C. Huang, Food Hydrocolloid 25, 1507–1513 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Skierka, M. Sadowska, Food Chem. 105, 1302–1306 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Nalinanon, S. Benjakul, W. Visessanguan, H. Kishimura, Food Chem. 104, 593–601 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Wang, B. Yang, R. Wang, X. Du, Food Chem. 111, 683–686 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Sadowska, I. Kolodziejska, C. Niecikowska, Food Chem. 81, 257–262 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Duan, J. Zhang, X. Du, X. Yao, K. Konno, Food Chem. 112, 702–706 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Kittiphattanabawon, S. Benjakul, W. Visessanguan, F. Shahidi, Eur Food Res Technol 230, 475–483 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J.W. Woo, S.J. Yu, S.M. Cho, Y.B. Lee, S.B. Kim, Food Hydrocolloid 22, 879–887 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. J.H. Muyonga, C.G.B. Cole, K.G. Duodu, Food Chem. 85, 81–89 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Benjakul, Y. Thiansilakul, W. Visessanguan, S. Roytrakul, H. Kishimura, T. Prodpranm, J. Meesane, J Sci Food Agr 90, 132–138 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. D.P. DeVore, G.H. Engebretson, C.F. Schachtele, J.J. Sauk, Com Biochem Phys B 77, 529–531 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.N. Zúñiga thanks CONICYT for financial support by means of the FONDECYT Project 11110156 Utilization of mussel byssus as an alternative source of collagen for the production of gelatin for food and pharmaceutical uses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R.N. Zúñiga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vallejos, N., González, G., Troncoso, E. et al. Acid and Enzyme-Aided Collagen Extraction from the Byssus of Chilean Mussels (Mytilus Chilensis): Effect of Process Parameters on Extraction Performance. Food Biophysics 9, 322–331 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-014-9339-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-014-9339-2

Keywords

Navigation