Skip to main content
Log in

Approaches to determine the constriction size distribution for understanding filtration phenomena in granular materials

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Granular filters in hydraulically loaded earth structures constitute the ultimate barrier for the blockage of small particles moving through the structure regularly or along concentrated leaks. If filters are inefficient to block small particles several types of internal erosion may be initiated. A corresponding phenomenon appears during suffusion in a wide graded hydraulically loaded fill, when fine particles, embedded in the pore structure of a soil skeleton, are washed out. The cumulative constriction size distribution (CSD) is physically the key property that qualifies the soils retention capability as like a spatial acting sieve. Constrictions are defined as the narrowest sections of channels between larger volumes (pores) within the pore network of granular material, and they are the main obstacles for a small particle to overcome when flowing along pathways. At least three different approaches are available to determine and compute the CSD, i.e., experimental, numerical and analytical methods. The purpose of this review is to present and discuss these methods pointing out their limits, advantages and significance related to internal erosion phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Kharusi AS, Blunt MJ (2007) Network extraction from sandstone and carbonate pore space images. J Petrol Sci Eng 56(4):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Raoush R, Thompson K, Willson C (2003) Comparison of network generation techniques for unconsolidated porous media. Sci Soc Am J 67:1687–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Azma E, Radja F, Peyroux R, Richefeu V, Saussine G (2008) Short-time dynamics of a packing of polyhedral grains under horizontal vibrations. Eur Phys J E 26(3):327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Binner R, Homberg U, Prohaska S, Kalbe U, Witt KJ (2010) Identification of descriptive parameters of the soil pore structure using experiments and CT data. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on scour and erosion, pp 397–407

  5. Bryant S, King P, Mellor D (1993) Network model evaluation of permeability and spatial correlation in a real random sphere packing. Transp Porous Media 11:53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cnudde V, Boone M (2013) High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: a review of the current technology and applications. Earth Sci Rev 123:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Mello VFB (1977) Reflections on design decisions of practical signifiance to embankment dams. Géotechnique 27(3):281–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delerue J, Perrier E, Zu Z, Velde B (1999) New algorithms in 3d image analysis and their application to the measurement of a spatialized pore size distribution. Phys Chem Earth 24:639–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia X, Akanji LT, Blunt M, Matthai S, Latham J (2009) Numerical study of the effects of particle shape and polydispersity on permeability. Phys Rev E (N021304):1–9

  10. Homberg U, Baum D, Prohaska S, Kalbe U, Witt KJ (2012) Automatic extraction and analysis of realistic pore structures from ct data for pore space characterization of graded soil. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on scour and erosion (ICSE-6); paper 181

  11. Humes C (1996) Geofilters’96. In: A new approach to compute the void size distribution curves of protective filters. Bitech, Montreal, pp 57–66

  12. Indraratna B, Raut A, Khabbaz H (2007) Constriction-based retention criterion for granular filter design. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(3):266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindow N, Baum D, Hege HC (2011) Voronoi-based extraction and visualization of molecular paths. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 17(12):2025–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Locke M, Indraratna B, Adikari G (2001) Time-dependent particle transport through granular filters. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 127(6):521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucknikov V, Gavrilova M, Medvedev N, Voloshin V (2002) The voronoi-delaunay approach for the free volume analysis of a packing of balls in a cylindrical container. Future Gener Comput Syst 18:676–679

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moraci N, Mandaglio M, Ielo D (2012) A new theoretical method to evaluate the internal stability of granular soils. Can Geotech J 49:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Musso A, Federico F (1983) Un metodo geometrico-probabilistico per la verifica dei filtri. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 4:173–193

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nolan G, Kavanagh P (1994) The size distribution of interstices in random packings of spheres. Powder Technol 78:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Powell MJ (1980) Computer-simulated random packing of spheres. Powder Technol 25(1):45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Raut A, Indraratna B (2008) Further advancement in filtration criteria through constriction-based techniques. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6):883–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reboul N, Vincens E, Cambou B (2008) Statistical analysis of void size distribution in a simulated narrowly graded packing of spheres. Granul Matter 10(6):457–468

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Reboul N, Vincens E, Cambou B (2010) A computational procedure to assess the distribution of constriction sizes for an assembly of spheres. Comput Geotech 37(1):195–206

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rémond S, Gallias J, Mizrahi A (2008) Characterization of voids in spherical particle systems by delaunay empty spheres. Granul Matter 10:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schuler U (1996) Geofilters’96. In: Scattering of the composition of soils—an aspect for the stability of granular filters. Bitech, Montreal, pp 21—34

  25. Silin D, Patzek T (2006) Pore space morphology analysis using maximal inscribed spheres. Phys A 371:336–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Silveira A (1965) An analysis of teh problem of washing through in protective filters. In: 6th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Montreal, Canada, vol 2, pp 551–555

  27. Silveira A, de Lorena Peixoto Jr J, Nogueira J (1975) On void size distribution of granular materials. In: 5th panamerican conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina, vol 3, pp 161–176

  28. Sjah J, Vincens E (2013) Determination of the constriction size distribution of granular filters by filtration tests. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 37(10):1231–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Soria M, Aramaki R, Viviani E (1993) Experimental determination of void size curves In: Filters in geotechnical and hydraulic engineering. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp 43–48

  30. Studart AR, Gonzenbach UT, Tervoort E, Gauckler LJ (2006) Processing routes to macroporous ceramics: a review. J Am Ceram Soc 89(6):1771–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. To H, Scheuermann A, Williams D (2012) A new simple model for the determination of the pore constriction size distribution. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on scour and erosion (ICSE-6); paper 082

  32. Wildenschild D, Hopmans J, Vaz C, Rivers M, Rikard D, Christensen B (2002) Using X-ray computed tomography in hydrology: systems, resolutions and limitations. J Hydrol 267:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Witt K (1986) Filtrationsverhalten und bemessung von erdstoff-filtern. verffentl. Tech. Rep. 104, D. Inst. F. Bodenmechanik und Felsmechanik. Universitt Karlsruhe. Heft

  34. Witt K (1993) Reliability study of granular filters. In: Brauns J, Heibaum M, Schuler U (eds) Filters in geotechnical and hydraulic engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 35–41

  35. Wu L, Nzouapet BN, Vincens E, Bernat-Minana S (2012) Laboratory experiments and the determination of the constriction size distribution of granular filters. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on scour and erosion (ICSE-6); paper 142

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author wants to acknowledge the French Agency of Research (ANR) and the French Network for Civil Engineering and Urbanization (RGCU) for the financial support provided to the national research project ERINOH “internal erosion in hydraulic structures” from which many results presented herein were obtained. The second author wishes to acknowledge the German Research Foundation (DFG) for supporting the research project “Conditions of suffusive erosion phenomena in soils”. Special thanks to Mrs. D. Böttge, Fraunhofergesellschaft ITKS, Dresden, for the photographs of ceramic structures, Fig. 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Vincens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincens, E., Witt, K.J. & Homberg, U. Approaches to determine the constriction size distribution for understanding filtration phenomena in granular materials. Acta Geotech. 10, 291–303 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0308-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0308-1

Keywords

Navigation