Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon dioxide sorption and diffusion in coals: Experimental investigation and modeling

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CO2 sorption and diffusion in coal are closely related to the occurrence of coal and gas outburst, geological sequestration of CO2 in coalbeds, and enhancing coalbed methane recovery by injecting CO2. Hence, it is significant to investigate the sorption properties and diffusion models of CO2 in coal. Here we used a newly designed experimental apparatus at Peking University to investigate the sorption and diffusion properties of CO2 in natural coal samples from Dashucun Mine and Wutongzhuang Mine in Handan city, Hebei province, and Jinhuagong Mine in Datong city, Shanxi province, and obtained CO2 sorption isotherms and diffusivity models. The results indicate that, in a certain pressure range, CO2 sorption isotherms for the coal samples are consistent with the Langmuir model, which assumes that monolayer sorption occurs at the interface between coal matrix and CO2 molecules, and the sorption isotherms feature nonstandard hyperbolas in mathematics. At the same pressure and temperature, as the vitrinite content increases, coal adsorbs more CO2 molecules. The relation between the sorption capacity and the coal rank may be described as a “U-type” trend, and medium rank coal has the least sorption capacity. The bulk diffusivity of CO2 in coal is not constant; in the range of CO2 mass fraction greater than 1%, it increases roughly linearly with increasing mass fraction of CO2 adsorbed (or CO2 partial pressure) in coal. CO2 diffusivity in coal is approximately 10−4 to 10−2 mm2/s in magnitudes, and the diffusivity ranges in coal samples are 3×10−4 to 8×10−3 mm2/s from Dashucun Mine, 2×10−4 to 4×10−3 mm2/s from Wutongzhuang Mine, and 2×10−4 to 4×10−3 mm2/s from Jinhuagong Mine. The results of the CO2 sorption and diffusion study can be applied to help predict and prevent coal and gas outburst as well as to evaluate the feasibility in geological sequestration of CO2 and to enhance coalbed methane recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guan P, Wang H Y, Zhang Y X. Mechanism of instantaneous coal outbursts. Geology, 2009, 37: 915–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodziony J, Lama R D. Sudden outbursts of gas and coal in underground coal mines. Australian Coal Association Research Program Report C4034, 1996. 677

  3. Zhou S N, Lin B Q. Coal Seams Gas Sorption and Flow Theory (in Chinese). Beijing: Coal Industry Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunter W D, Wong S, Cheel D B, et al. Large CO2 sinks: Their role in the mitigation of greenhouse gases from an international, national (Canadian) and provincial (Alberta) perspective. Appl Energ, 1998, 61: 209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gentzis T. Subsurface sequestration of carbon dioxide—An overview from an Alberta (Canada) perspective. Int J Coal Geol, 2000, 43: 287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Bergen F, Pagnier H, Krzystolik P. Field experiments of enhanced coalbed methane-CO2 in the upper Silesian basin of Poland. Environ Geosci, 2006, 13: 201–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kronimus A, Busch A, Alles S, et al. A preliminary evaluation of the CO2 storage potential in unminable coal seams of the Munster Cretaceous Basin, Germany. Int J Greenh Gas Con, 2008, 2: 329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White C M, Smith D H, Jones K L, et al. Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery—A review. Energ Fuel, 2005, 19: 659–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang E Y, He X Q, Lin H Y. adsorption statement of gas in coal (in Chinese). Coal Eng, 1996, 5: 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, He X Q, Wang E Y, et al. Study of absorptive characteristics of coal (in Chinese). J Taiyuan Univ Tech, 2001, 32: 449–451

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xie J L, Guo Y Y, Wu S Y. Study of adsorption of methane on coal at normal temperature (in Chinese). J Taiyuan Univ Tech, 2004, 35: 562–564

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sang S X, Zhu Y M, Zhang J, et al. The mechanism of gas adsorption in coal (II)—the physical process and theory model (in Chinese). Nat Gas Ind, 2005, 25: 16–18

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang W P, Cui Y J, Zhong L W, et al. Quantum chemical study on coal surface interacting with CH4 and H2O (in Chinese). Nat Gas Geosci, 2007, 18: 576–579

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang S Y, Sang S X, Yang Z G. Mechanism analysis on the effect of liquid water on coal adsorbing methane (in Chinese). J Chin Univ Min Tech, 2009, 38: 707–712

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang W P. Microscopic mechanism study on the influence of coal rank on adsorption capacity (in Chinese). Chin Coalbed Methane, 2009, 6: 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sang S X, Zhu Y M, Zhang J, et al. Influence of liquid water on coalbed methane adsorption: An experimental research on coal reservoirs in the south of Qingshui Basin. Chin Sci Bull, 2005, 50(Suppl.1): 79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L P, Su X B, Zeng R S. Discussion on the controlling effects of coal properties on coal adsorption capacity (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin, 2006, 80: 910–915

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang S Y, Sang S X. Mechanism of liquid water influencing on methane adsorption of coals with different ranks (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin, 2008, 82: 1350–1354

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tang S H, Tang D Z, Yang Q. Binary-component gas adsorption isotherm experiments and their significance to exploitation of coalbed methane (in Chinese). J Chin Univ Geosci, 2004, 29: 219–223

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tang S H, Han D X. Exploitation potential evaluation to coalbed methane based on multi-component gas adsorption isotherms (in Chinese). J Chin Univ Min Tech, 2002, 31: 630–633

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tang S H, Yang Q, Tang D Z. Comparison between the experiment data of binary-component gas adsorption isotherms and the calculating results with extended-Langmuir equation (in Chinese). Geol Sci Technol Inf, 2003, 22: 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou S N. Mechanism of gas flow in coal seams (in Chinese). J Chin Coal Soc, 1990, 15: 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu S Y. Preliminary approach on the low of gas diffusion and permeation on coal seams (in Chinese). J Taiyuan Univ Tech, 1994, 12: 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duan S M, Nie B S. The preliminary study on diffusion and permeation regularity of coal gas (in Chinese). J Taiyuan Univ Tech, 1998, 29: 413–416

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nie B S, He X Q, Wang E Y. Mechanism and modes of gas diffusion in coal seams (in Chinese). Chin Safety Sci J, 2000, 10: 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nie B S, Guo Y Y, Wu S Y, et al. Theoretical model of gas diffusion through coal particles and its analytical solution (in Chinese). J Chin Univ Min Tech, 2001, 30: 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nandi S P, Walker P L. Activated diffusion of methane in coal. Fuel, 1970, 49: 309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harpalani S, Ouyang S. A new laboratory technique to estimate gas diffusion characteristics of coal. Int Coalbed Methane Symposium, May 3–7, 1999, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 141–152

  29. Saghafi A, Faiz M, Roberts D. CO2 storage and gas diffusivity properties of coals from sydney basin, australia. Int J Coal Geol, 2007, 70: 240–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saghafi A, Pinetown K L, Grobler P G, et al. CO2 storage potential of south african coals and gas entrapment enhancement due to igneous intrusions. Int J Coal Geol, 2008, 73: 74–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Busch A, Gensterblum Y, Krooss B M. Methane and CO2 sorption and desorption measurements on dry argonne premium coals: Pure components and mixtures. Int J Coal Geol, 2003, 55: 205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Busch A, Gensterblum Y, Krooss B M, et al. Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption-diffusion experiments on coal: Upscaling and modeling. Int J Coal Geol, 2004, 60: 151–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mazumder S, Van Hemert P, Busch A, et al. Flue gas and pure CO2 sorption properties of coal: A comparative study. Int J Coal Geol, 2006, 67: 267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Siemons N, Busch A. Measurement and interpretation of supercritical CO2 sorption on various coals. Int J Coal Geol, 2007, 69: 229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y X. Geochemical Kinetics. Boston: Princeton University Press, 2008. 224–227, 284–298, 418–434

    Google Scholar 

  36. Harpalani S, Chen G L. Estimation of changes in fracture porosity of coal with gas emission. Fuel, 1995, 74: 1491–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harpalani S, Chen G. Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal. Geotechnol Geol Eng, 1997, 15: 303–325

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Bergen F, Spiers C, Floor G, et al. Strain development in unconfined coals exposed to CO2, CH4 and Ar: Effect of moisture. Int J Coal Geol, 2009, 77: 43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Majewska Z, Ceglarska-Stefanska G, Majewski S, et al. Binary gas sorption/desorption experiments on a bituminous coal: Simultaneous measurements on sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission. Int J Coal Geol, 2009, 77: 90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Larsen J W. The effects of dissolved CO2 on coal structure and properties. Int J Coal Geol, 2004, 57: 63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Manual of Symbols and Terminology for Physico Chemical Quantities and Units. Butterworth: London, U.K., 1972

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dutta P, Harpalani S, Prusty B. Modeling of CO2 sorption on coal. Fuel, 2008, 87: 2023–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Harpalani S, Prusty B, Dutta P. Methane/CO2 sorption modeling for coalbed methane production and CO2 sequestration. Energy Fuels, 2006, 20: 1591–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Langmuir I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc, 1918, 40: 1361–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang T J, Xu H J, Li S G, et al. The effect of temperature on adsorbing capacity of coal (in Chinese). J Chin Coal Soc, 2009, 34: 802–805

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ruckenstein E, Vaidyanathan A S, Youngquist G R. Sorption by solids with bidisperse pore structures. Chem Eng Sci, 1971, 26: 1305–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Clarkson C R, Bustin R M. The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: A laboratory and modeling study. 2. adsorption rate modeling. Fuel, 1999, 78: 1345–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shi J Q, Durucan S. A bidisperse pore diffusion model for methane displacement desorption in coal by CO2 injection. Fuel, 2003, 82: 1219–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cui X, Bustin R M, Dipple G. Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: Insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data. Fuel, 2004, 83: 293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Karacan C O, Mitchell G D. Behavior and effect of different coal microlithotypes during gas transport for carbon dioxide sequestration into coal seams. Int J Coal Geol, 2003, 53: 201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hildenbrand A, Krooss B M, Busch A, et al. Evolution of methane sorption capacity of coal seams as a function of burial history—A case study from the Campine Basin, NE Belgium. Int J Coal Geol, 2006, 66: 179–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Radlinski A P, Busbridge T L, Gray E, et al. Small angle X-ray scattering mapping and kinetics study of sub-critical CO2 sorption by two Australian coals. Int J Coal Geol, 2009, 77: 80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kelemen S R, Kwiatek L M. Physical properties of selected block argonne premium bituminous coal related to CO2, CH4, and N2 adsorption. Int J Coal Geol, 2009, 77: 2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Suuberg E M, Otake Y, Yun Y, et al. Role of moisture in coal structure and the effect of drying upon the accessibility of coal structure. Energy Fuels 1993, 7: 384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Thimons E D, Kissell F N. Diffusion of methane through coal. Fuel, 1973, 52: 274–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gruszkiewicz M S, Naney M T, Blencoe J G, et al. Adsorption kinetics of CO2, CH4, and their equimolar mixture on coal from the black warrior basin, west-central alabama. Int J Coal Geol, 2009, 77: 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Siemons N, Wolf K, Bruining J. Interpretation of carbon dioxide diffusion behavior in coals. Int J Coal Geol, 2007, 72: 315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hua F M. Prevention of coal and gas outbursts (in Chinese). Min Ind Sec Environ Prot, 2002, 29: 58–61

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stevens S H, Kuuskraa V A, Spector D, et al. CO2 sequestration in deep coal seams: Pilot results and worldwide potential. In: Riemer P, Eliasson B, Wokaun A, eds. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Oxford: Elsevier, 1999. 175–180

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stevens S H, Spector D, Riemer P. Enhanced coalbed methane recovery using CO2 injection: Worldwide resource and CO2 sequestration potential. In: Proceedings of the International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1998, November 2–6, Beijing, China, SPE Paper No. 48881, 489

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Guan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jian, X., Guan, P. & Zhang, W. Carbon dioxide sorption and diffusion in coals: Experimental investigation and modeling. Sci. China Earth Sci. 55, 633–643 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4272-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4272-4

Keywords

Navigation