Skip to main content
Log in

Competitive sorption and diffusion of methane and carbon dioxide mixture in Carboniferous-Permian anthracite of south Qinshui Basin, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the migration and competitive adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide in coal is crucial for the injection optimization design and injection displacement evaluation of the CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery (ECBM) project. In this paper, adsorption-desorption tests of three gaseous mixtures (75% CH4 + 25% CO2, 50% CH4 + 50% CO2, and 25% CH4 + 75% CO2) and pure CH4 and CO2 were performed on the anthracite from the southern Qinshui Basin. The results show that (1) there was an apparent hysteresis in sorption isotherms, and the size of hysteresis loops was related to the proportion of CO2 in the mixture. There was also a non-negligible error in using the extended Langmuir model to predict mixture sorption. (2) Separation factor (SCO2-CH4) for the sorption of CH4 and CO2 mixture varied with the equilibrium pressure and the equilibrium concentration of gas components. Its value was usually between 4 and 20. During the adsorption process, the SCO2-CH4 at low pressure was generally greater than that at high pressure. Moreover, SCO2-CH4 in the desorption process was generally higher than the adsorption process. (3) Bidisperse diffusion model could better describe the diffusion process of the mixture. In general, the macropore effective diffusivity varied as a power function with pressure. Under the same pressure, the macropore effective diffusivity increased with the increasing CO2 content. Further, the macropore effective diffusivity in the desorption process was larger than that in the adsorption process. The micropore effective diffusivity and the ratio of macropore uptake to micropore uptake had no apparent relationship with the gas component concentration and pressure. The results will help to comprehensively understand the sorption processes of the CH4 and CO2 mixture and provide basic numerical simulation data for the CO2-ECBM project in the southern Qinshui Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arri, LE, Yee, D, Morgan, WD, Jeansonne, MW, 1992. Modeling coalbed methane production with binary gas sorption. SPE J, 459-472.

  • Brochard L, Vandamme M, Pellenq RJM, Fen-Chong T (2012) Adsorption-induced deformation of microporous materials: coal swelling induced by CO2-CH4 competitive adsorption. Langmuir 28:2659–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch A, Krooss BM, Gensterblum Y, van Bergen F, Pagnier HJM (2003) High-pressure adsorption of methane, carbon dioxide and their mixtures on coals with a special focus on the preferential sorption behaviour. J Geochem Explor 78-79:671–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch A, Gensterblum Y, Krooss BM, Littke R (2004) Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption-diffusion experiments on coal: upscaling and modeling. Int J Coal Geol 60:151–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceglarska-Stefańska G, Zarębska K (2002) The competitive sorption of CO2 and CH4 with regard to the release of methane from coal. Fuel Process Technol 77-78:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson CR, Bustin RM (1999) The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 2. Adsorption rate modeling. Fuel 78:1345–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson CR, Bustin RM (2000) Binary gas adsorption/desorption isotherms: effect of moisture and coal composition upon carbon dioxide selectivity over methane. Int J Coal Geol 42:241–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell LD, Pan Z, Shangzhi M, Camilleri M, Down D, Carras J, Wenzhong Z, Xiaokang F, Benguang G, Briggs C, Lupton N (2013) Description of a CO2 enhanced coal bed methane field trial using a multi-lateral horizontal well. Energy Procedia 37:6760–6768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosdale PJ, Beamish BB, Valix M (1998) Coalbed methane sorption related to coal composition. Int J Coal Geol 35:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day S, Fry R, Sakurovs R (2008) Swelling of Australian coals in supercritical CO2. Int J Coal Geol 74:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutka B, Kudasik M, Pokryszka Z, Skoczylas N, Topolnicki J, Wierzbicki M (2013) Balance of CO2/CH4 exchange sorption in a coal briquette. Fuel Process Technol 106:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald JE, Sudibandriyo M, Pan Z, Robinson RL, Gasem KAM (2003) Modeling the adsorption of pure gases on coals with the SLD model. Carbon 41:2203–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Y, Song Y (2018) CO2-adsorption promoted CH4-desorption onto low-rank coal vitrinite by density functional theory including dispersion correction (DFT-D3). Fuel 219:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gensterblum Y, Merkel A, Busch A, Krooss BM (2013) High-pressure CH4 and CO2 sorption isotherms as a function of coal maturity and the influence of moisture. Int J Coal Geol 118:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Ni X, Wang Y, Du X, Yu T, Feng R (2018) Experimental study of CO2-water-mineral interactions and their influence on the permeability of coking coal and implications for CO2-ECBM. Minerals 8:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou X, Liu S, Zhu Y, Yang Y (2020) Experimental and theoretical investigation on sorption kinetics and hysteresis of nitrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in coals. Fuel 268:117349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyama T, Nishimoto S, Fujioka M, Xue Z, Ishijima Y, Pan Z, Connell LD (2011) Coal swelling strain and permeability change with injecting liquid/supercritical CO2 and N2 at stress-constrained conditions. Int J Coal Geol 85:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafortune S, Adelise F, Bentivegna G, Didier C, Farret R, Gombert P, Lagny C, Pokryszka Z, Toimil NC (2014) An experimental approach to adsorption of CO2 + CH4 gas mixtures onto coal (European RFCS CARBOLAB research project). Energy Procedia 63:5870–5878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H-H, Kim H-J, Shi Y, Keffer D, Lee C-H (2013) Competitive adsorption of CO2/CH4 mixture on dry and wet coal from subcritical to supercritical conditions. Chem Eng J 230:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Liu D, Cai Y, Shi Y (2016) Investigation of methane diffusion in low-rank coals by a multiporous diffusion model. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Kang Y, Zhou L (2018) Investigation of gas displacement efficiency and storage capability for enhanced CH4 recovery and CO2 sequestration. J Pet Sci Eng 169:485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang Y, Wang J, Pan Z (2020) Variation in permeability during CO2–CH4 displacement in coal seams: part 1–experimental insights. Fuel 263:116666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majewska Z, Ceglarska-Stefańska G, Majewski S, Ziętek J (2009) Binary gas sorption/desorption experiments on a bituminous coal: simultaneous measurements on sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission. Int J Coal Geol 77:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastalerz M, Drobniak A, Walker R, Morse D (2010) Coal lithotypes before and after saturation with CO2; insights from micro- and mesoporosity, fluidity, and functional group distribution. Int J Coal Geol 83:467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel A, Gensterblum Y, Krooss BM, Amann A (2015) Competitive sorption of CH4, CO2 and H2O on natural coals of different rank. Int J Coal Geol 150-151:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore TA (2012) Coalbed methane: a review. Int J Coal Geol 101:36–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee M, Misra S (2018) A review of experimental research on enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) recovery via CO2 sequestration. Earth Sci Rev 179:392–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi SP Jr, Walker PL (1970) Activated diffusion of methane in coal. Fuel 49:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi SP Jr, Walker PL (1975) Activated diffusion of methane from coals at elevated pressures. Fuel 54:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajdak A, Kudasik M, Skoczylas N, Wierzbicki M, Teixeira Palla Braga L (2019) Studies on the competitive sorption of CO2 and CH4 on hard coal. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 90:102789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Z, Connell LD (2009) Comparison of adsorption models in reservoir simulation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in coal. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Z, Connell LD, Camilleri M, Connelly L (2010) Effects of matrix moisture on gas diffusion and flow in coal. Fuel 89:3207–3217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Z, Ye J, Zhou F, Tan Y, Connell LD, Fan J (2018) CO2 storage in coal to enhance coalbed methane recovery: a review of field experiments in China. Int Geol Rev 60:754–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekot LJ, Reeves SR (2003) Modeling the effects of matrix shrinkage and differential swelling on coalbed methane recovery and carbon sequestration, international Coalbed Methane Symposium. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa p. paper 0328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pini R, Ottinger S, Burlini L, Storti G, Mazzotti M (2009) CO2 storage through ECBM recovery: an experimental and modeling study. Energy Procedia 1:1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prusty BK (2008) Sorption of methane and CO2 for enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration. J Nat Gas Chem 17:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexer TFT, Benham MJ, Aplin AC, Thomas KM (2013) Methane adsorption on shale under simulated geological temperature and pressure conditions. Energy Fuel 27:3099–3109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanov VN, Goodman AL, Larsen JW (2005) Errors in CO2 adsorption measurements caused by coal swelling. Energy Fuel 20:415–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckenstein E, Vaidyanathan AS, Youngquist GR (1971) Sorption by solids with bidisperse pore structures. Chem Eng Sci 26:1305–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven DM (1984) Principles of adsorption and adsorption processes. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurovs R (2012) Relationships between CO2 sorption capacity by coals as measured at low and high pressure and their swelling. Int J Coal Geol 90:156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander R, Connell LD, Camilleri M, Pan Z (2020) CH4, CO2, N2 diffusion in Bowen Basin (Australia) coal: relationship between sorption kinetics of coal core and crushed coal particles. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 81:103468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sircar S (1999) Gibbsian surface excess for gas adsorption revisited. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:3670–3682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM, Williams FL (1985) Nonlinear sorption effects on the determination of diffusion/sorption parameters. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 24:497–499

  • Standardization Administration of China. 2004. General rules for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis method: GB/T 19500-2004.

  • Standardization Administration of China. 2008a. Experimental method of high-pressure isothermal adsorption to coal: GB/T 19560-2008.

  • Standardization Administration of China. 2008b. Proximate analysis of coal: GB/T 212-2008.

  • Standardization Administration of China. 2008c. Method of determining microscopically the reflectance of vitrinite in coal: GB/T 6948-2008.

  • Standardization Administration of China. 2013. Determination of maceral group composition and minerals in coal: GB/T 8899-2013.

  • Sudibandriyo M, Pan Z, Fitzgerald JE, Robinson RL, Gasem KA (2003) Adsorption of methane, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and their binary mixtures on dry activated carbon at 318.2 K and pressures up to 13.6 MPa. Langmuir 19:5323–5331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topolnicki J, Kudasik M, Dutka B (2013) Simplified model of the CO2/CH4 exchange sorption process. Fuel Process Technol 113:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GX, Wei XR, Wang K, Massarotto P, Rudolph V (2010) Sorption-induced swelling/shrinkage and permeability of coal under stressed adsorption/desorption conditions. Int J Coal Geol 83:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Wang G, Ren T, Cheng Y (2014) Methane and CO2 sorption hysteresis on coal: a critical review. Int J Coal Geol 132:60–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White CM, Smith DH, Jones KL, Goodman AL, Jikich SA, LaCount RB, DuBose SB, Ozdemir E, Morsi BI, Schroeder KT (2005) Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery: a review. Energy Fuel 19:659–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong S, Law D, Deng X, Robinson J, Kadatz B, Gunter WD, Jianping Y, Sanli F, Zhiqiang F (2007) Enhanced coalbed methane and CO2 storage in anthracitic coals—micro-pilot test at South Qinshui, Shanxi, China. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Chu W, Huang X, Sun W, Jiang C, Liu Z (2016) CO2 adsorption-assisted CH4 desorption on carbon models of coal surface: a DFT study. Appl Surf Sci 375:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J, Feng S, Fan Z, Wang G, Gunte WD, Wong S, Robinson JR (2007) Micro-pilot test for enhanced coalbed methane recovery by injecting carbon dioxide in south part of Qinshui Basin. Acta Pet Sin 28:77

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Zhou L, Guo W, Cheng J, Hu Q (2008) Predictions of the adsorption equilibrium of methane/carbon dioxide binary gas on coals using Langmuir and ideal adsorbed solution theory under feed gas conditions. Int J Coal Geol 73:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu S, Bo J, Fengjuan L (2019) Competitive adsorption of CO2/N2/CH4 onto coal vitrinite macromolecular: effects of electrostatic interactions and oxygen functionalities. Fuel 235:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Liu S (2017) Experimental and theoretical characterization of methane and CO2 sorption hysteresis in coals based on Langmuir desorption. Int J Coal Geol 171:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Aziz N, Ren TX, Wang Z (2011) Influence of temperature on coal sorption characteristics and the theory of coal surface free energy. Procedia Eng 26:1430–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Liu K, Clennell MB, Dewhurst DN, Pervukhina M (2015) Molecular simulation of CO2–CH4 competitive adsorption and induced coal swelling. Fuel 160:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Chi Y, Xing W, Liu S, Song Y (2017) Competitive adsorption/desorption of CH4/CO2/N2 mixture on anthracite from China for ECBM operation. Energy Procedia 105:4289–4294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Feng Y, Zhang X (2016) Selective adsorption and selective transport diffusion of CO2–CH4 binary mixture in coal ultra-micropores. Environ Sci Technol 50:9380–9389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Zhang S, Tang S, Yu T, Feng Z (2020) Gas content modeling of No.3 coal seam in district 3 of southern Shizhuang block. Coal Geol Explor 48(1):96–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Tang X, Liu Q, Liu S, Zhang B, Jiang S, McLennan JD (2018) Permeability stress-sensitivity in 4D flow-geomechanical coupling of Shouyang CBM reservoir, Qinshui Basin, China. Fuel 232:817–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by the National Key R & D Program (Grant Nos. 2018YFB0605601) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41872178 and U1910205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songhang Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Santanu Banerjee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Tang, S., Li, Z. et al. Competitive sorption and diffusion of methane and carbon dioxide mixture in Carboniferous-Permian anthracite of south Qinshui Basin, China. Arab J Geosci 13, 1292 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06303-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06303-9

Keywords

Navigation