Skip to main content
Log in

The rules of the game

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This response to Rachel Muehrer, Jennifer Jenson, Jeremy Friedberg and Nicole Husain’s paper, Challenges and opportunities: Using a science-based video game in secondary school settings, explores the issues encountered while a science-based video game is introduced in secondary school settings. It highlights the importance of the context, the availability of technologies, the skilfulness of the teachers and readiness of the students for a more successful use of games in schools. In addition, the definition of student engagement is also further discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., & Pyke, C. (2001). A taxonomy of student engagement with education software: An exploration of literate thinking with electronic text. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 213–234. doi:10.2190/0CKM-FKTR-0CPF-JLGR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. doi:10.1007/BF02504683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). What would a state of the art instructional video game look like? Innovate, 1(6). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=80.

  • Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431–473. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1604_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., & Chabay, R. W. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychologist, 20, 217–230. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2004_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P. (2008). Spirit of the game: Empowering students as designers in school? British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 996–1003. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00823_1.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2004). An activity-theoretical approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools: Orienting activities and learner autonomy. Computers & Education, 43, 215–236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., Tay, L. Y., & Hedberg, J. G. (2011). Employing an activity-theoretical perspective to localize an education innovation in an elementary school. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44, 315–340. doi:10.2190/EC.44.3.d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A., & Engeström, Y. (1999). A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1/2), 1–8. doi:10.1023/A:1008694621289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olitsky, S., & Milne, C. (2012). Understanding engagement in science education: The psychological and the social. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 19–33). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, T. (1997). The Computer Delusion. The Atlantic Online: Digital Edition. Retrieved October 1, 2012 from http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/97jul/computer.htm.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2009 Results: Students on line: Digital technologies and performance (Volume VI). http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/55/48270093.pdf.

  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2005). Computer games and learning: Digital game-based learning. In J. Raessens & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 97–122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L. Y., & Lim, C. P. (2008). Engaging academically at-risk students in an ICT-mediated after school program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 521–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L. Y., Nair, S., & Lim, C. P. (2010). Supporting one-to-one computer-mediated learning environments in a Singapore primary school. In L. Y. Tay, C. P. Lim, & S. K. Myint (Eds.), A school’s journey into the future: Research by practitioners for practitioners (pp. 39–67). Singapore: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee Yong Tay.

Additional information

Lead Editor: C. Milne.

Forum response to Muehrer, Jenson, Friedberg and Husain (2012). Challenges and opportunities: Using a science-based videogame in secondary school settings. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9409-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tay, L.Y., Lim, C.P. The rules of the game. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 7, 813–819 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9464-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9464-5

Keywords

Navigation