Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to improve collaborative learning with video tools in the classroom? Social vs. cognitive guidance for student teams

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital video technologies offer a variety of functions for supporting collaborative learning in classrooms. Yet, for novice learners, such as school students, positive learning outcomes also depend centrally on effective social interactions. We present empirical evidence for the positive effects of instructive guidance on performance and on learning of students who use web-based video tools during a short collaborative-design task in their history lesson. In an experiment with 16-year old learners (N = 148) working on a history topic, we compared two contrasting types of guidance for student teams’ collaboration processes (social-interaction-related vs. cognitive-task-related guidance). We also compared two types of advanced video tools. Both types of guidance and tools were aimed at supporting students’ active, meaningful learning and critical analysis of a historical newsreel. Results indicated that social-interaction-related guidance was more effective in terms of learning outcomes (e.g., the students’ history skills) than cognitive-task-related guidance. The different tools did not yield consistent results. The implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asendorpf, J. & Wallbott, H.G. (1979). Maße der Beobachterübereinstimmung: Ein systematischer Vergleich.[Measures of Observer Consistency: A Systematic Comparison]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Emergent versus presentational hypertext. Conceptual and empirical approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. In R. Bromme & E. Stahl (Eds.), Writing hypertext and learning (pp. 73–78). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (2009). How much and what type of guidance is optimal for learning from instruction? In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 158–183). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Détienne, F. (2006). Collaborative design: Managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives. Interacting with Computers, 18(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R. (2004). Video perspectivity meets wild and crazy teens: Design ethnography. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2(4), 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new model of cognition and affect in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42 99–107.

  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Cook, W. L., & Kashy, D. A. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Series: Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Kirschner, P., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-Based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by designTM into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, R. (2006). Filme im geschichtsunterricht—Analysieren-interpretieren-dekonstruieren. [Films in history education—Analysing, Interpreting, De-constructing]. Historische Sozialkunde, 3, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing. Design Studies, 25(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Erickson, J., & Connell, T. (1994). Learning by designing hypermedia documents. Computers in the Schools, 10, 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorence, J. L. (1983). The critical analysis of documentary evidence: Basic skills in the history classroom. History Teaching, 8(2), 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 66–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction.

  • Monteyne, K., & Cracolice, M. (2004). What’s wrong with cookbooks? A reply to Ault. Chemical Education Today, 81(11), 1559–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., & Clements, D. H. (1991). Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practice. School Psychology Review, 20(1), 110–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., & O’Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (1991). Learning through multimedia. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 11(4), 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R., Mills, M., Rosen, J., Dauber, K., Effelsberg, W., & Hoffert, E. (2004). The DIVER™ project: Interactive digital video repurposing. IEEE Multimedia, 11(1), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (2006). Video-as-data and digital video manipulation techniques for transforming learning sciences research, education and other cultural practices. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), International handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 1321–1393). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994)

  • Salomon, G. (1984). Television is easy and print is tough: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, W. (2007). Historische Narrationen de-konstruieren—den Umgang mit Geschichte sichtbar machen: Ein neues Aufgabenfeld für forschend-entdeckendes Lernen. [De-constructing historical narration—making the handling of history visible: A new field for inquiry learning]. In: W. Hasberg and W. Weber (Eds.), Geschichte entdecken: Karl Filser zum 70. Geburtstag. [Discovering History: Karl Filser for his 70th Birthday] (pp. 285–311).Berlin: LIT.

  • Schreiber, W. (2008). Ein Kompetenz-Strukturmodell historischen Denkens. [A competence model for historical thinking]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. [Journal of Pedagogy], 54(2), 198–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., & Hartmann, K. (2007). It’s not television anymore. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., Finke, M., & Zahn, C. (2006). Knowledge acquisition by hypervideo design: An instructional program for university courses. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(3), 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., & Reiser, B. J. (2005). Explaining behavior through observational investigation and theory articulation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 315–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Feltovich, Jacobson and Coulson (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation (pp. 57–75). Hillsdale, N. J. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

  • Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., & Ramchandran, A. (2007). Reflections on a post-Gutenberg epistemology for video use in ill-structured domains: Fostering complex learning and cognitive flexibility. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 93–100). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011, in press) (Eds.). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(3), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The New Media Consortium and EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (2008). The Horizon Report. Retrieved on 10th January from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2008-Horizon-Report.pdf

  • Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2009). A primer on verbal protocol analysis. In D. Schmorrow, J. Cohn, & D. Nicholson (Eds.), The PSI handbook of virtual environments for training and education, volume 1 (pp. 332–346). Westport: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, C., Krauskopf, K., Hesse, F. W., & Pea, R. (2010a). Digital video tools in the classroom: How to support meaningful collaboration and critical thinking of students? In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Computers and collaboration in education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., & Rosen, J. (2010b). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for complex collaborative design processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 403–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., Mills, M., Finke, M., & Rosen, J. (2005). Advanced digital video technologies to support collaborative learning in school education and beyond. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years (pp. 737–742). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, C., Schwan, S., & Barquero, B. (2002). Authoring hypervideos: Design for learning and learning by design. In R. Bromme & E. Stahl (Eds.), Writing Hypertext and Learning: Conceptual and Empirical Approaches (pp. 153–176). London: Pergamon Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly funded by the DFG (German Research Foundation).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Riggenbachstrasse 16, CH-4600, Olten, Switzerland

    Carmen Zahn

  2. Knowledge Media Research Center (KMRC), Schleichstrasse 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany

    Karsten Krauskopf & Friedrich W. Hesse

  3. H-STAR Institute (Human Sciences and Technologies Advanced Research), Wallenberg Hall, Serra Mall, Building 160, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Roy Pea

Authors
  1. Carmen Zahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karsten Krauskopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Friedrich W. Hesse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roy Pea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Zahn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zahn, C., Krauskopf, K., Hesse, F.W. et al. How to improve collaborative learning with video tools in the classroom? Social vs. cognitive guidance for student teams. Computer Supported Learning 7, 259–284 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9145-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9145-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation