Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Further boundary conditions for the effects of perceptual disfluency on judgments of learning

  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The experience of fluency while learning might bias students’ metacognitive judgments of learning (JOLs) and impair the efficacy of their study behaviors. In the present experiments, we examined whether perceptual fluency affects JOLs (1) when people only experience one level of fluency, (2) when item relatedness is also available as a cue, and (3) across study-test trials. Participants studied a list of paired associates over two study-test trials and made JOLs for each item after studying it. We varied the perceptual fluency of the memory materials by making the font easy (fluent) or difficult (disfluent) to read. We also varied whether we manipulated the perceptual fluency of the items between-participants or within-participants and whether other memory factors—item relatedness and study time—were available for participants to use to inform their JOLs. We were only able to obtain effects of perceptual fluency on JOLs when we manipulated fluency within-participants and eliminated item relatedness as a cue for JOLs. The present results indicate that some effects of perceptual fluency on JOLs are not robust and might only occur under limited—and somewhat contrived—conditions. Therefore, these effects might be unlikely to bias students’ JOLs in actual learning situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. W. (2013). Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 41, 897–903. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0307-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. W. (2014). Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 429–440. doi:10.1037/a0034407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe and A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2006). The malleable meaning of subjective ease. Psychological Science, 17, 200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., Wilford, M. M., Kornell, N., & Mullaney, K. M. (2013). Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1350–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Matvey, G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsic–extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1180–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Tauber, S. K. (2014). Understanding people’s metacognitive judgments: An isomechanism framework and its implications for applied and theoretical research. In T. J. Perfect & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Memory (pp. 444–464). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Evans, K. M., & Benjamin, A. S. (2011). Fluency and familiarity: How memory for perceptual detail influences the remembering events. In P. A. Higham & J. P. Leboe (Eds.), Constructions of remembering and metacognition (pp. 17–27). Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L., Kelley, C., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, T., Hershko, S., & Halamish, V. (2013). The effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: bigger is not always better. PLoS One, 8, e74061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (2008). Subjective confidence in one’s answers: the consensuality principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 945–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1133–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H., Foley, J. M., Kajer, W. K., Thompson, R. C., & Willert, M. G. (1990). Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 609–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly: rhyme as a reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miele, D. B., Finn, B., & Molden, D. C. (2011). Does easily learned mean easily remembered? It depends on your beliefs about intelligence. Psychological Science, 22, 320–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. L., Tauber, S. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2014). The font-size effect on judgments of learning: does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOL) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall; the delayed-JOL effect. Psychological Science, 2, 267–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortegren, F. R., Serra, M. J., & England, B. D. (2015). Examining competing hypotheses for the effects of diagrams on recall for text. Memory & Cognition, 43, 70–84. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0429-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 15–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. J. (2010). Diagrams increase the recall of non-depicted text when understanding is also increased. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 112–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2005). Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1258–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2010). Metacomprehension judgments reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text. Memory, 18, 698–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition and education (pp. 278–298). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. J., Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2008). Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning? Experimental Aging Research, 34, 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, L. L., & Serra, M. J. (2014). Domain familiarity as a cue for judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 445–453. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0513-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sungkhasettee, V. W., Friedman, M. C., & Castel, A. D. (2011). Memory and metamemory for inverted words: illusions of competency and desirable difficulties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 973–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W. (1999). The importance of accurate monitoring and effective self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 662–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (Eds.). (2013). The experience of thinking: how the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1999). The dynamics of self-regulation. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation: advances in social cognition (Vol. XII, pp. 241–259). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wänke, M., & Hansen, J. (2015). Relative processing fluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 195–199. doi:10.1177/0963721414561766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth, L., & Strack, F. (2003). An inferential approach to the knew-it-all-along phenomenon. Memory, 11, 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluations. Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, C. L., Castel, A. D., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). When disfluency is—and is not—a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, MS 2051, Psychology Building, Lubbock, TX, 79409-2051, USA

    Debbie A. Magreehan & Michael J. Serra

  2. California State University, Chico, Chico, CA, USA

    Neil H. Schwartz

  3. Technische Universitaet Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Susanne Narciss

Authors
  1. Debbie A. Magreehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Serra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Neil H. Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susanne Narciss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie A. Magreehan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magreehan, D.A., Serra, M.J., Schwartz, N.H. et al. Further boundary conditions for the effects of perceptual disfluency on judgments of learning. Metacognition Learning 11, 35–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9147-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9147-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation