Skip to main content
Log in

A differential evolution copula-based approach for a multi-period cryptocurrency portfolio optimization

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing interest among investors in the new technology of blockchain and cryptocurrencies and some early investors in this new type of digital assets have made significant gains. The heuristic algorithm, differential evolution, has been advocated as a powerful tool in portfolio optimization. We propose in this study two new approaches derived from the traditional differential evolution (DE) method: the GARCH-differential evolution (GARCH-DE) and the GARCH-differential evolution t-copula (GARCH-DE-t-copula). We then contrast these two models with DE (benchmark) in single and multi-period optimizations on a portfolio consisting of five cryptoassets under the coherent risk measure CVaR constraint. Our analysis shows that the GARCH-DE-t-copula outperforms the DE and GARCH-DE approaches in both single- and multi-period frameworks. For these notoriously volatile assets, the GARCH-DE-t-copula has shown risk-control ability, hereby confirming the ability of t-copula to capture the dependence structure in the fat tail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Pearson’s correlation coefficients provide the degree of linear relationship between two variables.

  2. Kendall is a nonparametric test that measures the strength of dependence between two variables. It is given by: \(\tau =\frac{n_c-n_d}{\frac{1}{2}n(n-1)}\), where \(n_c\) is the number of concordant (ordered in the same way) pairs and \(n_d\) is the number of discordant (ordered differently) pairs.

  3. Although there are no absolute standards, many analysts view coefficients, in absolute values, of less than 0.25 as describing weak relationships, coefficients between 0.25 and 0.50 as moderate relationships, and those greater than 0.50 as strong relationships.

References

  • Alberg, D., Shalit, H., Yosef, R.: Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH models. Appl. Financ. Econ. 18(15), 1201–1208 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Ramirez, J., Rodriguez, E., Ibarra-Valdez, C.: Long-range correlations and asymmetry in the Bitcoin market. Phys. A. Stat. Mech. Appl. 492, 948–955 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardia, D., Mullen, K.M., Peterson, B.G., Ulrich, J.: DEoptim: Differential Evolution Optimization in R. R package version 2.1-0 (2011). https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=DEoptim. Accessed 19 Dec 2016

  • Bekiros, D., Hernandez, J.A., Hammoudeh, S., Nguyen, D.K.: Multivariate dependence risk and portfolio optimization: an application to mining stock portfolios. Int. J. Miner. Policy Econ. 46(2), 111 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Breymann, W., Dias, A., Embrechts, P.: Dependence structures for multivariate high-frequency data in finance. Quant. Finance 3, 114 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudt, K., Carl, P., Peterson, B.G.: PortfolioAnalytics: Portfolio Analysis, Including Numeric Methods for Optimization Of Portfolios, R package version 0.8 (2012)

  • Bouri, E., Azzi, G., Dyhrberg, A.H.: On the return–volatility relationship in the Bitcoin market around the price crash of 2013, economics: the open-access. Open-Assess. E-J. 11, 116 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M.K.: Deciphering the 2007–08 liquidity and credit crunch. J. Econ. Perspect. 23(1), 77100 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calafiore, G.: Ambiguous risk measures and optimal robust portfolios. SIAM J. Control Optimi. 18(3), 853–877 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, J., Chan, S., Nadarajah, S., Osterrieder, J.: GARCH modelling of cryptocurrencies. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 10(17), 1–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyhrberg, A.H.: Bitcoin, gold and the dollar a GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Res. Lett. 16, 85–92 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyhrberg, A.H.: Hedging capabilities of bitcoin Is it the virtual gold? Finance Res. Lett. 16, 139–144 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts, P., McNeil, A., Straumann, D.: Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. In: Dempster, M., Moffatt, H. (eds.) Risk management: value at risk and beyond, pp. 176–223. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F., Bollerslev, T.: Modelling the persistence of conditional variances. Econom. Rev. 5, 150 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H., Fang, K.: The metaelliptical distributions with given marginals. J. Multivar. Anal. 82, 116 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florackis, C., Kontonikas, A., Kostakis, A.: Stock market liquidity and macro-liquidity shocks: evidence from the 2007–2009 financial crisis. J. Int. Money Finance 44, 97–117 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gârleanu, N., Pedersen, L.: Dynamic trading with predictable returns and transaction costs. J. Finance 68(6), 2309–2340 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R., Runkle, D.E.: Relationship between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J. Finance 48(5), 1779–1801 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, N.: Multi-period mean–variance analysis: toward a general theory of portfolio choice. J. Finance 26(4), 857–884 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagströmer, B., Binner, J.M.: Stock portfolio selection with fullscale optimization and differential evolution. Appl. Financ. Econ. 19(19), 1559–1571 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krink, T., Paterlini, S.: Multiobjective optimization using differential evolution for real-world portfolio optimization. Comput. Manag. Sci. 8(1), 157–179 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krink, T., Mittnik, S., Paterlini, S.: Differential evolution and combinatorial search for constrained index-tracking. Ann. Oper. Res. 172, 153–176 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, R.K.Y., Alcock, J., Faff, R., Brailsford, T.: Canonical vine copulas in the context of modern portfolio management: are they worth it? J. Bank. Finance 37(8), 3085–3099 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maringer, D.G., Oyewumi, O.: Index tracking with constrained portfolios. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. 15(12), 57–71 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maringer, D.G., Meyer, M.: Smooth transition autoregressive models: new approaches to the model selection problem. Stud. Nonlinear Dyn. Econom. 12(1), 1–19 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashal, R., Zeevi, A.: Beyond correlation: extreme comovements between financial assets. Columbia Graduate School of Business (2002)

  • Moshirian, F.: The global financial crisis and the evolution of markets institutions and regulation. J. Bank. Finance 35, 502–511 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrup, P., Madsen, H., Lindstrm, E.: Dynamic Portfolio Optimization Across Hidden Market Regimes. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterrieder, J., Lorenz, J.: A statistical risk assessment of Bitcoin and its extreme tail behavior. Ann. Financ. Econ. 12(01), 17500031–175000319 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillip, A., Chan, J., Peiris, S.: A new look at cryptocurrencies. Econ. Lett. 163, 69 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, K., Storn, R.M., Lampinen, J.A.: Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 493–517 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Bank. Finance 26(7), 1443–1471 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahalia, V., Brandt, W.: Variable selection for portfolio choice. J. Finance 56(4), 1297–1351 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, A.: Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de lInstitut de Statistique de lUniversité de Paris 8, 229–231 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 11(4), 341–359 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yollin, G.: R Tools for Portfolio Optimization. In: Presentation at R/Finance Conference 2009 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous referee for the valuable comments to improve the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jules Clement Mba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mba, J.C., Pindza, E. & Koumba, U. A differential evolution copula-based approach for a multi-period cryptocurrency portfolio optimization. Financ Mark Portf Manag 32, 399–418 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-018-0320-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-018-0320-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation