Abstract
The existence of the momentum effect in stock returns has been documented for the US (e.g., Jegadeesh and Titman in J. Finance 48(1), 65–91, 1993) and many other national equity markets worldwide (e.g., Griffin et al. in J. Finance 58(6), 2515–2547, 2003). However, little is known about the active employment of momentum strategies among institutional investors outside the US. This paper provides first evidence of momentum behavior among German mutual funds. We find the fund trades to follow stock returns on an aggregated institutional level. Moreover, we detect significant momentum behavior among funds with a European and global equity focus, as well as among funds predominantly investing in Asia. In contrast, German funds do not seem to engage in momentum strategies when trading domestic stocks. While only half the funds in our sample trade in accordance with past returns, 66 % of the funds within the largest size quintile follow momentum strategies. Finally, we do not find momentum trading funds to outperform the other funds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a comprehensive list of momentum trading studies using US data, see Sias (2007).
Only two other studies focus on momentum behavior by investors outside the US: Grinblatt and Keloharju (2000) analyze the momentum behavior of various investor types within the Finnish stock market and De Haan and Kakes (2011) examine the investment strategies of Dutch pension funds, life insurers, and non-life insurers. Other papers focusing on the existence of the momentum effect within national stock markets include, e.g., Rey and Schmid (2007).
The disposition effect describes the tendency of investors to sell past winner stocks while keeping stocks that have lost in value.
We do not use this methodology to analyze specific subgroups of funds as the approach is rather limited in its informative value.
Chen et al. (2004) argue that larger funds need to find more stocks to invest in as they cannot just scale up their current holdings due to liquidity problems that would result in a negative influence on the securities’ prices.
See § 44 I and II InvG (Investmentgesetz).
Stotz (2007) finds that the annualized return difference between surviving and closing funds in the German mutual fund industry is substantial, making the absence of survivorship bias an important attribute of this empirical study.
Because momentum trading is measured relative to the historical performance of the stocks held in the individual portfolios, it is not necessary to synchronize the reporting dates as described, for example, by Wermers (1999).
Note that Eq. (1) differs from Sias (2007) in that the denominator is the number of shares held by the institutions rather than the number of all shares outstanding. This is to better reflect the fact that the sample contains international stocks, in which the covered funds’ ownership represents only a small fraction of all shares outstanding.
Sias (2007) uses a similar modification.
A dyad is defined as a period for which holding information is available at the beginning and at the end of the period.
Note that a “buy” (“sell”) adjustment does not require a purchase (sale) of shares of the actual security, but rather an increase (decrease) in the relative equity position due to portfolio trades in general.
Therefore, a fund with partially missing portfolio information in a given period is omitted from the analysis for the dyads that are affected. This results in slightly fewer observations for the TAL0M measure.
According to § 59 InvG, German mutual funds are prohibited from short selling.
Walter and Weber (2006) support this assumption by suggesting that the lack of superior performance in their sample of German mutual funds indicates momentum trading rather than stock picking talent.
Due to the wide geographic scope of the holdings in our fund universe, the security returns were adjusted using the returns of the MSCI World index.
This value was adjusted as the unadjusted value was heavily skewed due to a few outliers. The reported value for the fifth quintile was restricted to observations smaller than the value of the third quartile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range (Q3–Q1) of the fifth quintile. This procedure follows an approach described by Hoaglin et al. (2000). The adjustment did not change the general trend presented.
However, since the fund sample used by Grinblatt et al. (1995) is not free of survivorship bias, it is possible that liquidated funds that may have employed contrarian strategies were not included in their sample.
We assess market conditions by the sign of the return of the MSCI World index over the respective periods.
In unreported results, we find that the subgroup of funds investing solely in German equities also exhibits significant lag-1 contrarian strategies.
Barber and Odean (2008) document that in an environment with many stocks to choose from, individual investors are more likely to buy stocks that have recently caught their attention, for example, stocks that exhibited high prior returns.
Certainly, other common stock trading strategies, such as high versus low beta stocks, large versus small market capitalization stocks, and value versus growth stocks (see, e.g., Carhart 1997), can also be realized with limited research dedication. Indeed, Asness et al. (2012) find that a combination of value and momentum strategies across different asset classes can be especially beneficial for investors.
As a robustness check, we differentiate fund size in terms of number of different securities held and find similar results of momentum trading for the respective size quintiles.
More precisely, Grinblatt et al. (1995) show that, on average, well performing funds tend to herd by buying past winning stocks.
Eling and Schuhmacher (2007) show that the choice of performance measure does not affect performance rankings of hedge funds and that the Sharpe ratio is adequate for evaluating hedge funds. Although under normal circumstances, mutual funds and hedge funds cannot be easily compared due to structural differences, the composition of the L0M measure, which removes the short-sale restriction from mutual funds, allows us to conclude that the results of Eling and Schuhmacher (2007) should also be valid in this case.
The low Sharpe ratio of 0.00 for the extreme momentum quintile Q5 indicates that the high L0M\(f,t\) measure is not the result of successful stock-picking at the beginning of the period. As this trading behavior would by definition have led to a higher fund performance, the high L0M\(f,t\) level must be the result of active momentum behavior.
We calculate portfolio turnover in accordance with the methodology of the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP): The minimum of a fund’s total value of stock purchases and sales in \(t\), divided by the total net assets of the fund in \(t\).
We use dummy variables for the funds’ respective geographic investment focus (Germany, Europe-wide, Asia, other regions, other countries, worldwide, and industry) that equal 1 if a fund exhibits the specific investment focus; 0 otherwise.
Please note that the high adjusted \(R^{2}\) of the regressions are mainly due to the high dependence of the Sharpe ratios on market conditions.
Note that this is a hypothetical return owed to the construction of the L0M measure and not an actual return achieved by the funds.
References
Arnswald, T.: Investment behaviour of German equity fund managers—an exploratory analysis of survey data. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 08/01 (2001)
Asem, E., Tian, G.Y.: Market dynamics and momentum profits. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(6), 1549–1562 (2010)
Asness, C.S., Moskowitz, T.J., Pedersen, L.H.: Value and momentum everywhere. J. Finance (2012). doi:10.1111/jofi.12021
August, R., Schiereck, D., Weber, M.: Momentumstrategien am deutschen Aktienmarkt: Neue empirische Evidenz zur Erklärung des Erfolgs. Kredit und Kapital 33(2), 198–234 (2000)
Badrinath, S.G., Wahal, S.: Momentum trading by institutions. J. Finance 57(6), 2449–2478 (2002)
Barber, B.M., Odean, T.: All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(2), 785–818 (2008)
Barberis, N., A. Schleifer, Vishny, R.: A model of investor sentiment. J. Financial Econ. 49(3):307, no. 43 (1998)
Bolliger, G.: The characteristics of individual analysts’ forecasts in Europe. J. Banking Finance 28(9), 2283–2309 (2004)
Bromann, O., Schiereck, D., Weber, M.: Reichtum durch (anti-)zyklische Handelsstrategien am deutschen Aktienmarkt? Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 49(7/8), 603–616 (1997)
Carhart, M.M.: On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1), 57–82 (1997)
Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., Kubik, J.D.: Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. Am. Econ. Rev. 94(5), 1276–1302 (2004)
Curcuru, S.E., Thomas, C.P., Warnock, F.E., Wongswan, J.: US international equity investment and past and prospective returns. Am. Econ. Rev. 101(7), 3440–3455 (2011)
Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., Subrahmanyam, A.: Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. J. Finance 53(6), 1839–1885 (1998)
De Haan, L., Kakes, J.: Momentum or contrarian investment strategies: evidence from Dutch institutional investors. J. Banking Finance 35(9), 2245–2451 (2011)
Eling, M., Schuhmacher, F.: Does the choice of performance measure influence the evaluation of hedge funds? J. Banking Finance 31(9), 2632–2647 (2007)
Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., Blake, C.R., Krasny, Y., Ozelge, S.: The effect of holdings data frequency on conclusions about mutual fund behavior. J. Banking Finance 34(5), 912–922 (2010)
Fama, E.F., French, K.: The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47(2), 427–465 (1992)
Ferreira, M.A., Keswani, A., Miguel, A.F., Ramos, S.B.: The determinants of mutual fund performance: a cross-country study. Rev. Finance (2012). doi:10.1093/rof/rfs013
Franck, A., Walter, A.: Portfolio complexity and herd behavior: evidence from the German mutual fund market. Kredit und Kapital 45(3), 343–371 (2012)
Glaser, M., Weber, M.: Momentum and turnover: evidence from the German stock market. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. 55(2), 108–135 (2003)
Griffin, J.M., Ji, X., Martin, J.S.: Momentum investing and business cycle risk: evidence from pole to pole. J. Finance 58(6), 2515–2547 (2003)
Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M.: The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: a study of Finland’s unique data set. J. Financial Econ. 55(1), 43–67 (2000)
Grinblatt, M., Titman, S.: Mutual fund performance: an analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings. J. Bus. 62(3), 393–416 (1989)
Grinblatt, M., Titman, S.: Performance measurement without benchmarks: an examination of mutual fund returns. J. Bus. 66(1), 47–68 (1993)
Grinblatt, M., Titman, S., Wermers, R.: Momentum investment strategies, portfolio performance, and herding: a study of mutual fund behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 85(5), 1088–1105 (1995)
Hoaglin, D.C., Mosteller, F., Tukey, J.W.: Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. Wiley, New York (2000)
Hong, H., Stein, J.: A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets. J. Finance 54(6), 2143–2184 (1999)
Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.: Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48(1), 65–91 (1993)
Jiang, G.J., Yao, T., Yu, T.: Do mutual funds time the market? Evidence from portfolio holdings. J. Finance Econ. 86(3), 724–758 (2007)
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: The impact of institutional trading on stock prices. J. Financial Econ. 32(1), 23–43 (1992)
Menkhoff, L., Schmidt, U.: The use of trading strategies by fund managers: some first survey evidence. Appl. Econ. 37(15), 1719–1730 (2005)
Odean, T.: Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5), 1775–1798 (1998)
Pollet, J.M., Wilson, M.: How does size affect mutual fund behavior? J. Finance 63(6), 2941–2969 (2008)
Rey, D.M., Schmid, M.M.: Feasible momentum strategies: evidence from the Swiss stock market. Financial Mark. Portfolio Manag. 21(3), 325–352 (2007)
Rouwenhorst, K.G.: International momentum strategies. J. Finance 53(1), 267–284 (1998)
Schiereck, D., De Bondt, W., Weber, M.: Contrarian and momentum strategies in Germany. Financial Anal. J. 55(6), 104–116 (1999)
Sias, R.W.: Reconcilable differences: momentum trading by institutions. Financial Rev. 42(1), 1–22 (2007)
Stotz, O.: Selection, market timing and style timing of equity mutual funds—evidence from Germany. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 77(1), 51–73 (2007)
Walter, A., Weber, F.M.: Herding in the German mutual fund industry. Eur. Financial Manag. 12(3), 375–406 (2006)
Wermers, R.: Mutual fund herding and the impact on stock prices. J. Finance 54(2), 581–622 (1999)
Acknowledgments
We thank Alexander G. Kerl, Markus M. Schmid (the editor), an anonymous referee, participants at the 2013 Campus for Finance Research Conference, and participants at the FMI Seminar at the Justus-Liebig-University Giessen for valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors are exclusively responsible for any errors and inaccuracies. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Giessen or Ernst & Young GmbH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franck, A., Walter, A. & Witt, J.F. Momentum strategies of German mutual funds. Financ Mark Portf Manag 27, 307–332 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-013-0211-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-013-0211-z