Skip to main content
Log in

Endogenous fluctuations, markups, capacity and credit constraints

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper endogenous fluctuations have been generated by referring to endogenous markups, variable capacity utilization, and credit constraints. As one can detect, they are the same ingredients as those used to generate the so called selffulfilling cycles. With respect to this strand of literature, three changes are introduced. First of all, credit constraints are conceived within the Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis. Secondly, markups may have different dynamic patterns and impacts. Finally, heterogeneous agents are assumed to form evolutionary expectations. The results of these interacting aggregate demand and supply aspects are endogenous fluctuations obtained by means of simulations. Robust limit cycles and interesting comovements between variables are achieved in this medium-run model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The statement refers to mainstream literature, as the macroeconomic impact of uncertainty is at the core of alternative schools of thoughts such as the Post-Keynesian one, whose methodological tenets are basically incompatible with the literature we are just mentioning.

  2. The notion of medium run grounds on the idea of Solow (2000); see also Ferri (2002).

  3. Here we especially refer to the emphasis on quantity adjustments and their connection to output and capital excess capacity.

  4. One cannot overlook the fact that Schumpeter (1934) himself emphasized the fundamental role of credit.

  5. The roots of this literature obviously trace back to a broader number of authors. Among others Fisher (1933) and Schumpeter (1939). On the issue of endogenous financial instability, the interested reader may find in Toporowski (2005) a good synthesis of the different positions which are strictly related to the view we hold in this paper.

  6. Further developments can be found in Bernanke et al. (1996, 1999). A critical review of the concept is presented in Coric (2011).

  7. See Asunama (2011) as an example of credit rationing which emerges without asymmetric information, in a context of economic depression.

  8. In the case, the countercyclical behavior depends on the assumption of rigid prices and decreasing marginal productivity of labor.

  9. This type of production function is a business cycle version of the long-run variety suggested by the endogenous growth theory (see Aghion and Howitt 1998), where capital replaces employment.

  10. One can use other distributions. For instance, Gilchrist and Williams (2005), refer to a (log) normal distribution. Liu and Wang (2014) refer to a Pareto distribution.

  11. The percentage of operative plants (i.e. \(n_{t})\) is determined after the idiosyncratic shock has been revealed. In some other models, the variable \(s_{th}\) works ex ante and in this case conditional expectations must be used (see Krause and Lubik 2007).

  12. The time subscript is maintained in cases exogenous shocks are to be considered.

  13. We are stressing the fact that (fundamental) uncertainty implies wider consequences than limited contract enforcement. Hence the lack of information due to uncertainty creates interacting and intertwined rigidities. In this respect Eq. 9, is itself a simplistic way to deal with the issue of uncertainty as conceived by Minsky. Nevertheless it is coherent with the setup of the paper where different kinds of quantity adjustments operate through all sectors of the economy (integrating both real and financial sides). This equation makes explicit the quantity constraint due to the financial side of the economy.

  14. See Fendoglu (2014) on the link between credit spreads and uncertainty. Gaiotti (2013), Gu and Wright (2011), Huang et al. (2014) and Kocherlatoka (2000) can be quoted among most recent references supporting the framework we suggest, justifying empirically and theoretically the emergence of endogenous credit cycles and slow recoveries. On the link between credit and resource reallocation see Barlevy (2003).

  15. The presence of financially constrained consumers is documented in Cynamon and Fazzari (2008), while the case of investment is dealt with in Fazzari et al. (2008).

  16. Layard et al. (1991) discuss the literature on the cyclical behaviour of the markup, stressing the absence of strong conclusions. For instance, the authors present both contributions that underline the effects due to oligopolistic behaviour (it may be more difficult to enforce collusion between oligopolistic firms during booms because the incentive for undercutting are greater at this time and therefore this leads to downward pressure on the markup) and contributions emphasizing the role of a changing elasticity of demand. On the negative correlation between markups and the number of competitors, see also Jaimovich (2007). One may also find further reference in Chevalier and Scharfstein (1996), Do Santos et al. (2005), Edmond and Veldkamp (2009), Lewis and Poilly, (2012), Seegmuller (2009) and Zhang (2007).

  17. The weak nonlinearities of the model only allows to generate closed orbits.

  18. Lengnick and Wohltmann (2013) introduce a changing gap.

  19. This selection mechanism can be interpreted as an evolutionary one, as stressed by De Grauwe (2008).

  20. The parameters used in the expectation formula are \(\upgamma =400\) (in the weight formula) and \(\uprho =0.7\), a parameter used in the equation referring to the attractiveness of the different forecasting strategies.

    Table 8 Parameters for the model with heterogeneous agents
  21. The same holds true for the parameters related to expectations. In fact, \(\uprho \) can vary from \(-\)90 to 30 %, while \(\upgamma \) can change \(\pm 100\) %.

References

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf Q, Gershman B, Howitt P (2011) Banks, market organizations, and macroeconomic performance: an agent-based computational analysis, NBER, Working Paper 17102, Cambridge, MA

  • Asunama D (2011) A model of credit rationing without asymmetric information: an inquiry into the credit market during an economic depression. Evol Inst Econ Rev 7(2):261–277

  • Barlevy G (2003) Credit frictions and the allocation of resources over the business cycle. J Monet Econ 50(8):1795–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Bundick B (2012) Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand, NBER Working Paper no. 18420, Cambridge

  • Benhabib J, Wang P (2013) Financial constraints, endogenous markups, and self-fulfilling equilibria. J Monet Econ 60(7):789–805

  • Bernanke BS (1991) Nonmonetary effects of the financial crisis in the propagation of the Great Depression. In: Mankiw NG, Romer D (eds) New Keynesian economics, vol 2. The Mit Press, New York, pp 293–324

  • Bernanke BS, Gertler M (1990) Financial fragility and economic performance. Q J Econ 105:87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke BS, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1996) The financial accelerator and the flight to quality. Rev Econ Stat 78(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke BS, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1999) The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In: Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1341–1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom N (2009) The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77:623–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock W, Hommes C (1997) A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65:1059–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano LJ, Motto R, Rostagno M (2014) Risk shocks. Am Econ Rev 104:27–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier JA, Scharfstein DS (1996) Capital market imperfection and countercyclical markups: theory and evidence. Am Econ Rev 86(4):703–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley TF, Hansen GD, Prescott EC (1995) Equilibrium business cycles with idle resources and variable capacity utilization. Econ Theory 6:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coric B (2011) The financial accelerator effect: concept and challenges. Financ Theory Pract 35(2):171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Cynamon BZ, and Fazzari SM (2008) Household debt in the consumer age: source of growth-risk of collapse. Capital Soc 3(2)

  • De Grauwe P (2008) Animal spirits and monetary policy, vol 2418. CeSifo Working Paper, Munich, Germany

  • De Grauwe P (2011) Animal spirits and monetary economy. Econ Theory 47(2–3):42–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos Ferreira R, Lloyd-Braga T (2005) Non-linear endogenous fluctuations with free entry and variable markups. J Econ Dyn Control 29(5):847–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmond C, Veldkamp L (2009) Income dispersion and counter-cyclical markups. J Monet Econ 56(6):791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari S, Ferri P, Greenberg E (1998) Aggregate demand and firm behaviour: a new perspective on Keynesian microfoundations. J Post Keynes Econ 20:527–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari S, Ferri P, Greenberg E (2008) Cash flow, investment, and keynes-minsky cycles. J Econ Behav Org 65(3–4):555–572

  • Fendoglu S (2014) Optimal monetary policy rules, financial amplification and uncertain business cycles. J Econ Dyn Control 46:271–305

  • Ferri P (2002) La macroeconomia di medio period. Giappicchelli editore, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri P (2011) Macroeconomics of growth cycles and financial instability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferri P, Cristini A, Variato A (2014) Labor demand in a stagnant economy, Working Paper, University of Bergamo

  • Fisher I (1933) The debt deflation theory of Great Depression. Econometrica 1(1):337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaschel P, Franke R, Semmler W (1997) Dynamic macroeconomics. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiotti E (2013) Credit availability and investment: lessons from the ‘Great Recession’. Eur Econ Rev 59:212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gali J (2013) Notes for a new guide to Keynes (I): wages, aggregate demand, and employment. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(5):973–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatti D, Gaffeo E, Gallegati M, Giulioni G, Palestrini A (2008) Emergent macroeconomics. An agent-based approach to business fluctuations. New economic window seriesSpringer, Milan and New York

  • Gertler MN, Kiyotaki N, and Queralto A (2012) Financial crises, bank risk exposure and government financial policy. J Monet Econ 59:S17–S34

  • Gilchrist S, Williams JC (2005) Investment. Capacity, and uncertainty: a putty–clay approach. Rev Econ Dyn 8(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu C, Wright R (2011) Endogenous credit cycles, NBER Working Paper no. 17510, NBER, Cambridge (MA)

  • Hall RE (2011) The long slump. Am Econ Rev 101:431–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang K, Chena J, Lic Z, Sun J (2014) Financial conditions and slow recoveries, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers: 14–00004

  • Jaimovich N (2007) Firm dynamics and markup variations: implications for sunspot equilibria and endogenous fluctuations. J Econ Theory 137:300–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabarbounis L, Neiman B (2013) The global decline of the labor share, NBER Working Paper no. 19136, NBER, Cambridge (MA)

  • Kocherlatoka NR (2000) Creating business cycles through credit constraints. Fed Reserve Bank Minneap Q Rev 24(3):2–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause MV, Lubik TA (2007) The (ir)relevance of real wage rigidity in the New Keynesian model with search frictions. J Monet Econ 54(3):706–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment. Interest and money. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov YA (2004) Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Layard R, Nickell S, Jackman R (1991) Unemployment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengnick M, Wohltmann HW (2013) Agent-based markets and New-Keynesian macroeconomics: a synthesis. J Econ Interact Coord 8(1):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis V, Poilly C (2012) Firm entry, markups and the monetary transmission mechanism. J Monet Econ 59(7):670–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Wang P (2011) Credit constraints and self-fulfilling business cycles, Federal Reserve of San Francisco, Working Paper Series, 2010–22

  • Liu Z, Wang P (2014) Credit constraints and self-fulfilling business cycles. Am Econ J Macroecon 6(1):32–69

  • Minsky HP (1982) Can ‘it’ happen again?. M.E, Sharpe, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky HP (1986) Stabilizing an unstable economy. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekarda CJ, Ramey VA (2003) The cyclical behaviour of the price-cost markup, NBER, Working Paper no. 19099, Cambridge (MA)

  • Papadimitriou DB, Wray LR (2010) The Elgar Compendium to H. Minsky. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JR, Schott PK (2012) The surprisingly swift of US manufacturing employment, NBER, Working Paper 18655, Cambridge (MA)

  • Reinhart C, Rogoff K (2012) This time is different: eight centuries of folly. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer D (1996) Advanced macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryoo S (2013) Bank profitability, leverage and financial instability: a Minsky–Harrod model. Camb J Econ 37:1127–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Grohe S, Uribe M (2012) The making of a great contraction with a liquidity trap and jobless recovery, NBER, 18544, Cambridge (MA)

  • Schneider D (2011) The labor share: a review of theory and evidence. Discussion Paper 069, Humboldt- Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycles, trans. Redvers Opie, 1961. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1939) Business Cycles: a theoretical historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Seegmuller T (2009) Capital-Labour substitution and endogenous fluctuations: a monopolistic competition approach with variable markup. Jpn Econ Rev 60(3):301–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets F, Wouters R (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles. A Bayesian DSGE analysis. Am Econ Rev 97:586–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (2000) Toward a macroeconomics of the medium run. J Econ Perspect 14(1):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toporowski J (2005) Theories of financial disturbance. An examination of critical theories of finance from Adam Smith to the present day. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Toporowski J (2015) The business cycle as a method of analysis. In: Cristini A, Fazzari SM, Greenberg E, Leoni R (eds) Cycles, growth, and the Great Recession. Routledge, London, pp 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Vercelli A (2014) The asymmetric-information approach and the Great Recession: a critical approach. In: Cristini A, Fazzari SM, Greenberg E, Leoni R (eds) Cycles, growth, and the Great Recession. Routledge, London, pp 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford M (2003) Interest and prices. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (2007) Endogenous markups, intensity of competition and the persistence of business cycles. South Econ J 74(2):546–565

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Maria Variato.

Appendix

Appendix

The following are the multipliers used in the linearized model:

$$\begin{aligned} N1= & {} \frac{\partial n_t }{\partial sth_t }=-\frac{1}{2\sigma }; \\ CU1= & {} \frac{\partial A_t }{\partial n_t }=\sigma _0 +z_0 -2\sigma _0 n_{0;} ; \\ S1= & {} \frac{\partial \omega _t }{\partial \mu _t }=\frac{z_0 }{\mu _0^2 *A_0 }; \\ S2= & {} \frac{\partial \omega _t }{\partial A_t }=\frac{z_0 }{\mu _0 A^{2}_0 }; \\ P1= & {} \frac{\partial th_t }{\partial P_t }=\frac{w_0 }{P^{2}_0 }; \end{aligned}$$

The suffix 0 stands for the stationary values that can be obtained in the following straightforward manner. A labor share equal to 0.60 has been assumed, with wages equal to 0.35. Furthermore, in a business cycle perspective about 82 % of the plants are operating on average. By assuming a steady state value of \(\hbox {A}\,=\,1\) and a threshold equal to \(-\)0.46, the following values are obtained: \(\upsigma =0.72\), \(\hbox {z}\,=\,1.08\), P\(_{0}=0.575\), \(\uptau _{1}=0.0134\) and \(\upmu _{0}=1.78\). Finally m\(_{0} = 1\) while the following equality has been imposed: \(\upgamma _{0}\,=\,\hbox {cred}_{0}\,=\,\hbox {L}_{0}=20\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferri, P., Cristini, A. & Variato, A.M. Endogenous fluctuations, markups, capacity and credit constraints. J Econ Interact Coord 11, 273–292 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-015-0154-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-015-0154-8

Keywords

Navigation