Abstract
In the present paper endogenous fluctuations have been generated by referring to endogenous markups, variable capacity utilization, and credit constraints. As one can detect, they are the same ingredients as those used to generate the so called selffulfilling cycles. With respect to this strand of literature, three changes are introduced. First of all, credit constraints are conceived within the Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis. Secondly, markups may have different dynamic patterns and impacts. Finally, heterogeneous agents are assumed to form evolutionary expectations. The results of these interacting aggregate demand and supply aspects are endogenous fluctuations obtained by means of simulations. Robust limit cycles and interesting comovements between variables are achieved in this medium-run model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The statement refers to mainstream literature, as the macroeconomic impact of uncertainty is at the core of alternative schools of thoughts such as the Post-Keynesian one, whose methodological tenets are basically incompatible with the literature we are just mentioning.
Here we especially refer to the emphasis on quantity adjustments and their connection to output and capital excess capacity.
One cannot overlook the fact that Schumpeter (1934) himself emphasized the fundamental role of credit.
The roots of this literature obviously trace back to a broader number of authors. Among others Fisher (1933) and Schumpeter (1939). On the issue of endogenous financial instability, the interested reader may find in Toporowski (2005) a good synthesis of the different positions which are strictly related to the view we hold in this paper.
See Asunama (2011) as an example of credit rationing which emerges without asymmetric information, in a context of economic depression.
In the case, the countercyclical behavior depends on the assumption of rigid prices and decreasing marginal productivity of labor.
This type of production function is a business cycle version of the long-run variety suggested by the endogenous growth theory (see Aghion and Howitt 1998), where capital replaces employment.
The percentage of operative plants (i.e. \(n_{t})\) is determined after the idiosyncratic shock has been revealed. In some other models, the variable \(s_{th}\) works ex ante and in this case conditional expectations must be used (see Krause and Lubik 2007).
The time subscript is maintained in cases exogenous shocks are to be considered.
We are stressing the fact that (fundamental) uncertainty implies wider consequences than limited contract enforcement. Hence the lack of information due to uncertainty creates interacting and intertwined rigidities. In this respect Eq. 9, is itself a simplistic way to deal with the issue of uncertainty as conceived by Minsky. Nevertheless it is coherent with the setup of the paper where different kinds of quantity adjustments operate through all sectors of the economy (integrating both real and financial sides). This equation makes explicit the quantity constraint due to the financial side of the economy.
See Fendoglu (2014) on the link between credit spreads and uncertainty. Gaiotti (2013), Gu and Wright (2011), Huang et al. (2014) and Kocherlatoka (2000) can be quoted among most recent references supporting the framework we suggest, justifying empirically and theoretically the emergence of endogenous credit cycles and slow recoveries. On the link between credit and resource reallocation see Barlevy (2003).
Layard et al. (1991) discuss the literature on the cyclical behaviour of the markup, stressing the absence of strong conclusions. For instance, the authors present both contributions that underline the effects due to oligopolistic behaviour (it may be more difficult to enforce collusion between oligopolistic firms during booms because the incentive for undercutting are greater at this time and therefore this leads to downward pressure on the markup) and contributions emphasizing the role of a changing elasticity of demand. On the negative correlation between markups and the number of competitors, see also Jaimovich (2007). One may also find further reference in Chevalier and Scharfstein (1996), Do Santos et al. (2005), Edmond and Veldkamp (2009), Lewis and Poilly, (2012), Seegmuller (2009) and Zhang (2007).
The weak nonlinearities of the model only allows to generate closed orbits.
Lengnick and Wohltmann (2013) introduce a changing gap.
This selection mechanism can be interpreted as an evolutionary one, as stressed by De Grauwe (2008).
The parameters used in the expectation formula are \(\upgamma =400\) (in the weight formula) and \(\uprho =0.7\), a parameter used in the equation referring to the attractiveness of the different forecasting strategies.
The same holds true for the parameters related to expectations. In fact, \(\uprho \) can vary from \(-\)90 to 30 %, while \(\upgamma \) can change \(\pm 100\) %.
References
Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Ashraf Q, Gershman B, Howitt P (2011) Banks, market organizations, and macroeconomic performance: an agent-based computational analysis, NBER, Working Paper 17102, Cambridge, MA
Asunama D (2011) A model of credit rationing without asymmetric information: an inquiry into the credit market during an economic depression. Evol Inst Econ Rev 7(2):261–277
Barlevy G (2003) Credit frictions and the allocation of resources over the business cycle. J Monet Econ 50(8):1795–1818
Basu S, Bundick B (2012) Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand, NBER Working Paper no. 18420, Cambridge
Benhabib J, Wang P (2013) Financial constraints, endogenous markups, and self-fulfilling equilibria. J Monet Econ 60(7):789–805
Bernanke BS (1991) Nonmonetary effects of the financial crisis in the propagation of the Great Depression. In: Mankiw NG, Romer D (eds) New Keynesian economics, vol 2. The Mit Press, New York, pp 293–324
Bernanke BS, Gertler M (1990) Financial fragility and economic performance. Q J Econ 105:87–114
Bernanke BS, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1996) The financial accelerator and the flight to quality. Rev Econ Stat 78(1):1–15
Bernanke BS, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1999) The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In: Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1341–1393
Bloom N (2009) The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77:623–685
Brock W, Hommes C (1997) A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65:1059–1095
Christiano LJ, Motto R, Rostagno M (2014) Risk shocks. Am Econ Rev 104:27–65
Chevalier JA, Scharfstein DS (1996) Capital market imperfection and countercyclical markups: theory and evidence. Am Econ Rev 86(4):703–725
Cooley TF, Hansen GD, Prescott EC (1995) Equilibrium business cycles with idle resources and variable capacity utilization. Econ Theory 6:35–49
Coric B (2011) The financial accelerator effect: concept and challenges. Financ Theory Pract 35(2):171–196
Cynamon BZ, and Fazzari SM (2008) Household debt in the consumer age: source of growth-risk of collapse. Capital Soc 3(2)
De Grauwe P (2008) Animal spirits and monetary policy, vol 2418. CeSifo Working Paper, Munich, Germany
De Grauwe P (2011) Animal spirits and monetary economy. Econ Theory 47(2–3):42–457
Dos Santos Ferreira R, Lloyd-Braga T (2005) Non-linear endogenous fluctuations with free entry and variable markups. J Econ Dyn Control 29(5):847–871
Edmond C, Veldkamp L (2009) Income dispersion and counter-cyclical markups. J Monet Econ 56(6):791–804
Fazzari S, Ferri P, Greenberg E (1998) Aggregate demand and firm behaviour: a new perspective on Keynesian microfoundations. J Post Keynes Econ 20:527–558
Fazzari S, Ferri P, Greenberg E (2008) Cash flow, investment, and keynes-minsky cycles. J Econ Behav Org 65(3–4):555–572
Fendoglu S (2014) Optimal monetary policy rules, financial amplification and uncertain business cycles. J Econ Dyn Control 46:271–305
Ferri P (2002) La macroeconomia di medio period. Giappicchelli editore, Torino
Ferri P (2011) Macroeconomics of growth cycles and financial instability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Ferri P, Cristini A, Variato A (2014) Labor demand in a stagnant economy, Working Paper, University of Bergamo
Fisher I (1933) The debt deflation theory of Great Depression. Econometrica 1(1):337–357
Flaschel P, Franke R, Semmler W (1997) Dynamic macroeconomics. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Gaiotti E (2013) Credit availability and investment: lessons from the ‘Great Recession’. Eur Econ Rev 59:212–227
Gali J (2013) Notes for a new guide to Keynes (I): wages, aggregate demand, and employment. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(5):973–1003
Gatti D, Gaffeo E, Gallegati M, Giulioni G, Palestrini A (2008) Emergent macroeconomics. An agent-based approach to business fluctuations. New economic window seriesSpringer, Milan and New York
Gertler MN, Kiyotaki N, and Queralto A (2012) Financial crises, bank risk exposure and government financial policy. J Monet Econ 59:S17–S34
Gilchrist S, Williams JC (2005) Investment. Capacity, and uncertainty: a putty–clay approach. Rev Econ Dyn 8(1):1–27
Gu C, Wright R (2011) Endogenous credit cycles, NBER Working Paper no. 17510, NBER, Cambridge (MA)
Hall RE (2011) The long slump. Am Econ Rev 101:431–469
Huang K, Chena J, Lic Z, Sun J (2014) Financial conditions and slow recoveries, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers: 14–00004
Jaimovich N (2007) Firm dynamics and markup variations: implications for sunspot equilibria and endogenous fluctuations. J Econ Theory 137:300–325
Karabarbounis L, Neiman B (2013) The global decline of the labor share, NBER Working Paper no. 19136, NBER, Cambridge (MA)
Kocherlatoka NR (2000) Creating business cycles through credit constraints. Fed Reserve Bank Minneap Q Rev 24(3):2–10
Krause MV, Lubik TA (2007) The (ir)relevance of real wage rigidity in the New Keynesian model with search frictions. J Monet Econ 54(3):706–727
Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment. Interest and money. Macmillan, London
Kuznetsov YA (2004) Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Springer, New York
Layard R, Nickell S, Jackman R (1991) Unemployment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lengnick M, Wohltmann HW (2013) Agent-based markets and New-Keynesian macroeconomics: a synthesis. J Econ Interact Coord 8(1):1–32
Lewis V, Poilly C (2012) Firm entry, markups and the monetary transmission mechanism. J Monet Econ 59(7):670–685
Liu Z, Wang P (2011) Credit constraints and self-fulfilling business cycles, Federal Reserve of San Francisco, Working Paper Series, 2010–22
Liu Z, Wang P (2014) Credit constraints and self-fulfilling business cycles. Am Econ J Macroecon 6(1):32–69
Minsky HP (1982) Can ‘it’ happen again?. M.E, Sharpe, Armonk
Minsky HP (1986) Stabilizing an unstable economy. Yale University Press, New Haven
Nekarda CJ, Ramey VA (2003) The cyclical behaviour of the price-cost markup, NBER, Working Paper no. 19099, Cambridge (MA)
Papadimitriou DB, Wray LR (2010) The Elgar Compendium to H. Minsky. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Pierce JR, Schott PK (2012) The surprisingly swift of US manufacturing employment, NBER, Working Paper 18655, Cambridge (MA)
Reinhart C, Rogoff K (2012) This time is different: eight centuries of folly. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Romer D (1996) Advanced macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Ryoo S (2013) Bank profitability, leverage and financial instability: a Minsky–Harrod model. Camb J Econ 37:1127–1160
Schmitt-Grohe S, Uribe M (2012) The making of a great contraction with a liquidity trap and jobless recovery, NBER, 18544, Cambridge (MA)
Schneider D (2011) The labor share: a review of theory and evidence. Discussion Paper 069, Humboldt- Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin
Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycles, trans. Redvers Opie, 1961. Oxford University Press, New York
Schumpeter JA (1939) Business Cycles: a theoretical historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill, NewYork
Seegmuller T (2009) Capital-Labour substitution and endogenous fluctuations: a monopolistic competition approach with variable markup. Jpn Econ Rev 60(3):301–319
Smets F, Wouters R (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles. A Bayesian DSGE analysis. Am Econ Rev 97:586–606
Solow R (2000) Toward a macroeconomics of the medium run. J Econ Perspect 14(1):151–158
Toporowski J (2005) Theories of financial disturbance. An examination of critical theories of finance from Adam Smith to the present day. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton
Toporowski J (2015) The business cycle as a method of analysis. In: Cristini A, Fazzari SM, Greenberg E, Leoni R (eds) Cycles, growth, and the Great Recession. Routledge, London, pp 77–83
Vercelli A (2014) The asymmetric-information approach and the Great Recession: a critical approach. In: Cristini A, Fazzari SM, Greenberg E, Leoni R (eds) Cycles, growth, and the Great Recession. Routledge, London, pp 77–83
Woodford M (2003) Interest and prices. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Zhang J (2007) Endogenous markups, intensity of competition and the persistence of business cycles. South Econ J 74(2):546–565
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The following are the multipliers used in the linearized model:
The suffix 0 stands for the stationary values that can be obtained in the following straightforward manner. A labor share equal to 0.60 has been assumed, with wages equal to 0.35. Furthermore, in a business cycle perspective about 82 % of the plants are operating on average. By assuming a steady state value of \(\hbox {A}\,=\,1\) and a threshold equal to \(-\)0.46, the following values are obtained: \(\upsigma =0.72\), \(\hbox {z}\,=\,1.08\), P\(_{0}=0.575\), \(\uptau _{1}=0.0134\) and \(\upmu _{0}=1.78\). Finally m\(_{0} = 1\) while the following equality has been imposed: \(\upgamma _{0}\,=\,\hbox {cred}_{0}\,=\,\hbox {L}_{0}=20\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferri, P., Cristini, A. & Variato, A.M. Endogenous fluctuations, markups, capacity and credit constraints. J Econ Interact Coord 11, 273–292 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-015-0154-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-015-0154-8