Skip to main content
Log in

Depositional seals in polyacrylamide-amended soils of varying clay mineralogy and texture

  • SOILS, SEC 2 • GLOBAL CHANGE, ENVIRON RISK ASSESS, SUSTAINABLE LAND USE • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Depositional seals, formed when turbid waters infiltrate into soils, lead to a reduction in soil hydraulic conductivity (HC) and enhance runoff and soil erosion. Since clay size particles constitute a dominant proportion of depositional seals, soil texture and clay mineralogy play a significant role in determining the seal’s hydraulic characteristics. Presence of high molecular weight anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) in suspension flocculates fine sediments, and therefore, its application to the soil surface may modify the characteristics of the depositional seal. The impact of PAM on the latter is expected to be influenced by soil properties. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effects of PAM application on clay flocculation and the HC of depositional seals formed in four soils varying in texture (ranging from loamy sand to clay loam), and diverse proportions of clay mineral constituents (kaolinite, smectite, and vermiculite).

Materials and methods

Soils from four physiographic regions of North Carolina, with different textures and clay mineral compositions, were used in the study. Clay size particles were extracted from each soil using common procedures and used for preparing 5 g L−1 clay suspension. The effects of adding an anionic high molecular weight (12 × 106 Da) PAM in various concentrations (0–10 mg L−1) to 5 g L−1 clay suspensions on sediment flocculation were studied with a nephelometer probe. The HC of depositional seals was studied by leaching soil columns with either deionized water (DW) or 5 g L−1 clay suspensions in the presence or absence of PAM at the soil surface. PAM was applied either as dry granules to the soil surface (at a rate equivalent to 20 kg ha−1) or by filling the overhead volume in the columns with a 0.5 mg L−1 PAM solution.

Results and discussion

Even at a PAM concentration of 0.5 g L−1, there was an increase of >50% in clay flocculation. Leaching the columns with DW in the presence of PAM caused a significant reduction in the HC. Conversely, during leaching with clay suspensions, addition of PAM in solution resulted in HC values (both initial and at apparent steady state) that were generally higher than those obtained in the absence of PAM. The impact of adding dry PAM varied with soil type. It had a negative impact on the HC of the depositional seals in the loamy sand and had no effect in the sandy loams; it did increase the HC of the seal in the clay loam from 3.6 mm h−1 in absence of PAM to 9.9 mm h−1 with PAM application.

Conclusions

The HC of the depositional seals studied depended on the combined effects of soil texture and clay mineral constituents. The effects of PAM on the HC of depositional seals depended on soil texture and on the mode of PAM application. Our results suggest that, in fine-textured soils, PAM is effective in improving the HC of depositional seals because it leads to the flocculation of the suspended material and thus to the formation of a less dense and more permeable seal on the soil surface. In coarse-textured soils, the lack of success of PAM in improving the permeability of depositional seals may stem from either the formation of a PAM layer at the soil surface with a distinct lower HC than that of the bulk soil and the depositional seal, or due to accumulation of the flocculated material in the pores at the upper few millimeters of the soil, thus forming a layer with a permeability even lower than that of the depositional seal itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarstad J-S, Miller D-E (1973) Soil management practices for reducing runoff under center-pivot sprinkler systems. J Soil Water Conserv 28:171–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajwa H-A, Trout T-J (2006) Polyacrylamide and water quality effects on infiltration in sandy loam soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:643–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arora H-S, Coleman N-T (1979) The influence of electrolyte concentration on flocculation of clay suspensions. Soil Sci 127:134–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad M-A, Mermut A-R (1988) Micromorphological and physico-chemical characteristics of soil crust types in north western Alberta, Canada. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:724–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj A-K, McLaughlin RA (2008) Simple polyacrylamide dosing systems for turbidity reduction in stilling basins. Trans ASABE 51:1653–1662

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj A-K, McLaughlin R-A, Babcock D (2008) Energy dissipation and chemical treatment improve stilling basin performance. Trans ASABE 51:1645–1652

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj A-K, McLaughlin R-A, Shainberg I, Levy G-J (2009) Polyacrylamide effect on flocculation and hydraulic properties of depositional seals made of different clays. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:910–918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bresson L, Boiffin J (1990) Morphological characterization of soil crust development stages on an experimental field. Geoderma 47:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresson L-M, Moran C-J (1995) Structural change induced by wetting and drying in seedbeds of a hardsetting soil with contrasting aggregate size distribution. Eur J Soil Sci 46:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Tarchitzky J, Brower J, Morin J, Banin A (1980) Scanning electron microscope observations on soil crusts and their formation. Soil Sci 130:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorom M, Rengasamy P (1995) Dispersion and zeta potential of pure clays as related to net particle charge under varying pH, electrolyte concentration and cation type. Eur J Soil Sci 46:657–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman N-T, Jackson M-L, Mehlich A (1949) Mineral composition of the clay fraction of several Coastal Plain, Piedmont, and Mountain soils of North Carolina. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 13:81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day P-R et al (1965) Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In: Black CA et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 547–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng Y, Dixon J-B, White G-N (2006) Adsorption of polyacrylamide on smectite, illite, and kaolinite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:297–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J-B, White G-N (1999) Soil mineralogy laboratory manual, 5th ed. Published by the authors, Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station

  • Duley F-L (1939) Surface factors affecting the rate of intake of water by soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 4:60–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox D-M, Le Bissonnais Y, Quetin P (1998) The implications of spatial variability in surface seal Rc for infiltration in a mound and depression microtopography. Catena 32:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel H, Rhoades J-D (1978) Effects of dispersion and swelling on soil hydraulic conductivity. J Test Eval 6:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel H, Fey M-V, Levy G-J (1992) Organic and inorganic anion effects on reference and soil clay critical flocculation concentration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1762–1766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freebairn D-M, Gupta S-C, Rawls W-J (1991) Influence of aggregate size and microrelief on development of surface soil crusts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee G-W, Bauder J-W (1986) Particle size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. ASA–SSSA, Madison, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Green V-S, Stott D-E, Norton L-D, Graveel J-G (2000) Polyacrylamide molecular weight and charge effects on infiltration under simulated rainfall. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1786–1791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillel D (1980) Applications of soil physics. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M-L, Lim C-H, Zelanzy L-W (1986) Oxides, hydroxides and aluminosilicates. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. ASA–SSSA, Madison, pp 101–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper W-D, Trout T-J, Brown M-J, Rosenau R-C (1985) Furrow erosion and water and soil management. Trans ASAE 28:1564–1572

    Google Scholar 

  • Keren R (1989) Effect of clay charge density and adsorbed ions on the rheology of montmorillonite suspension. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:25–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keren R (1991) Adsorbed sodium fraction's effect on rheology of montmorillonite–kaolinite suspensions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:376–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lado M, Ben-Hur M, Shainberg I (2007) Clay mineralogy, ionic composition, and pH effects on hydraulic properties of depositional seals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:314–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laird D-A (1997) Bonding between polyacrylamide and clay mineral surfaces. Soil Sci 162:826–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz R-D, Sojka R-E (1994) Field results using polyacrylamide to manage furrow erosion and infiltration. Soil Sci 158:274–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz R-D, Bjorneberg D-L (2003) Polyacrylamide and straw residue effects on furrow irrigation erosion and infiltration. J Soil Water Conserv 58:312–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik M, Letey J (1992) Pore-sized-dependent apparent viscosity for organic solutes in saturated porous media. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1032–1035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mamedov A, Huang C, Levy G-J (2006) Antecedent moisture content and aging duration effects on seal formation and erosion in smectitic soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:832–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre D-S (1958) Soil splash and the formation of surface crusts by raindrop impact. Soil Sci 85:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin R-A, Bartholomew N (2007) Soil factors influencing suspended sediment flocculation by polyacrylamide. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:537–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2. Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:1409–1416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neaman A, Singer A (2000) Rheological properties of aqueous suspensions of palygorskite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:427–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips E-J-P, Lovley D-R (1987) Determination of Fe (III) and Fe (II) in oxalate extracts of sediments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:938–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pupisky H, Shainberg I (1979) The hydraulic conductivity of sandy soils: the effect of salt concentration and salt composition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J-P (1994) Interparticle forces: a basis for the interpretation of soil physical behaviour. Adv Agron 53:121–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J-P, Murray R-S (1991) Towards a model for soil structural behaviour. Aust J Soil Res 29:829–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengasamy P, Sumner M-E (1997) Processes involved in sodic behaviour. In: Sumner ME, Naidu R (eds) Sodic soils. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2004) The SAS system for Windows. Release 9.1. SAS, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg I, Letey J (1984) Response of soils to sodic and saline conditions. Hilgardia 52:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg I, Singer M (1985) Effect of electrolytic concentration on the hydraulic properties of depositional crust. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1260–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojka R-E, Lentz R-D (1997) Reducing furrow irrigation erosion with polyacrylamide (PAM). J Prod Agric 10:1–2, 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Sojka R-E, Bjorneberg D-L, Entry J-A, Lentz R-D, Orts W-J (2007) Polyacrylamide in agriculture and environmental land management. Adv Agron 92:75–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southard R-J, Shainberg I, Singer M (1988) Influence of electrolyte concentration on the micromorphology of artificial depositional crust. Soil Sci 145:278–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G-W (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. SSSA Book Ser 5. SSSA, WI, pp 475–490

    Google Scholar 

  • West L-T, Chiang S-C, Norton L-D (1992) The morphology of surface crusts. In: Sumner ME, Stewart BA (eds) Soil crusting: chemical and physical processes. Advances in soil science. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittig L-D, Allardice W-R (1986) X-ray diffraction techniques. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. ASA–SSSA, Madison, pp 331–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Young MH, Moran E-A, Yu Z, Zhu J, Smith D-M (2009) Reducing saturated hydraulic conductivity of sandy soil with polyacrylamide. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:13–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay K. Bhardwaj.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Rainer Horn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhardwaj, A.K., McLaughlin, R.A. & Levy, G.J. Depositional seals in polyacrylamide-amended soils of varying clay mineralogy and texture. J Soils Sediments 10, 494–504 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0198-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0198-2

Keywords

Navigation