Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating human health impact from indoor emissions into an LCA: a case study evaluating the significance of the use stage

  • LCIA OF IMPACTS ON HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOSYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Indoor emissions of toxic substances from products can have a negative effect on human health. These are typically not considered in a life cycle assessment (LCA), potentially underestimating the importance of the use stage. The purpose of this paper is to develop a method that, based on a set of measured emission rates, calculates the impact on human health during the use stage of products that are used indoors and that emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Methods

Emissions from a product are measured in a test chamber and reported as a set of emission rates (microgrammes per hour) at specific points in time (hour/day). Constrained non-linear regression (CNLR) analysis is then used to determine parameters for three emission models, and a model is selected based on goodness of fit with the measured emission rates (R 2 and expert judgement). The emission model is integrated over a defined time period to estimate the total use stage emissions per functional unit (FU). The total emissions are subsequently integrated in a homogeneously mixed one-box model within the USEtox model. Intake fraction (iF) is calculated based on size of residential home, inhalation rate, exposure time, ventilation rate, mixing factor and number of people exposed.

Results and discussion

The method is tested in a case study of a chair, with the results showing that the impacts in the use stage are in most cases significantly higher than from the production and disposal stages combined. The sensitivity to parameter variations is evaluated. Intake fraction (factor of 761), replacement frequency (factor of 70) and emission model (factor of 24) are found to be the most important model parameters. Limiting early exposure (>14 % of emissions may occur in the first month and >50 % in the first year) and replacing furniture less frequently will reduce exposure.

Conclusions

The case study shows that the impact on human health from indoor emissions can be of significance, when compared to the impact on human health from total outdoor emissions. Without specific exposure data (e.g. ventilation rates) the uncertainty will be high. The developed method is applicable to all products that emit VOCs, provided that the emission rate can be modelled using an exponential decay model and that the product amount is related to a meaningful functional unit. It is recommended that when performing an LCA of products that emit VOCs, the indoor use stage is included in the life cycle impact assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afsset (2009) Saisine Afsset no. 2004/11. Afsset, Paris

  • AgBB (2010) Evaluation procedure for VOC emissions from building products. http://www.agbb-nik.de/. Accessed 20 September 2012

  • Allan M, Richardson GM (1998) Probability density functions describing 24-hour inhalation rates for use in human health risk assessments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 4(2):379–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews E, Lesage P, Benoît C, Parent J, Norris G, Revéret J-P (2009) Life cycle attribute assessment—case study of Quebec greenhouse tomatoes. J Ind Ecol 13(4):565–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DH, McKone TE, Evans JS, Nazaroff WW, Margni MD, Jolliet O, Smith KR (2002) Defining intake fraction. Environ Sci Technol 36(9):206a–211a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund B, Johansson I, Lindvall T (1989) Volatile organic compounds from used building materials in a simulated chamber study. Environ Int 15:383–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel A, Plaisance H (2011) Screening of formaldehyde indoor sources and quantification of their emission using a passive sampler. Build Environ 46(6):1284–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasche S, Bischof W (2005) Daily time spent indoors in German homes—baseline data for the assessment of indoor exposure of German occupants. Int J Hyg Environ Heal 208(4):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SK (1999) Chamber assessment of formaldehyde and VOC emissions from wood-based panels. Indoor Air 9(3):209–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang JCS, Sparks LE, Guo Z, Fortmann R (1998) Evaluation of sink effects on VOCs from a latex paint. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 48(10):953–958

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J-C, Wey M-Y, Chiang B-C, Hsieh S-M (1998) The simulation of hexavalent chromium formation under various incineration conditions. Chemosphere 36(7):1553–1564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Schmidbauer N, Sundell J, Hasselgren M, Spenger J, Bornehag C-G (2010) Common houshold chemicals and the allergy risks in pre-school children. PLoS One 5(10):e13423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo A, De Bortoli M, Knöppel H, Pecchio E, Visser H (1993) Adsorption on selected volatile organic compounds on a carpet, a wall coating, and a gypsum board in a test chamber. Indoor Air 3:276–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ECA (1997) Evaluation of VOC emissions from building products. European Comission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EPD Norway (2008) Product category rules for preparing an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for product group seating solution. EPD Norway, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofins (2012) Eurofins. http://www.eurofins.com. Accessed 20 September 2012

  • Fet AM, Skaar C, Michelsen O (2009) Product category rules and environmental product declarations as tools to promote sustainable products: experiences from a case study of furniture production. Clean Technol Environ 11(2):201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenguard (2011) GREENGUARD Environmental Institute Formaldehyde Free Verification Requirement. Marietta

  • Guo Z (2002a) Review of indoor emission source models. Part 1. Overview. Environ Pollut 120(3):533–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z (2002b) Review of indoor emission source models. Part 2. Parameter estimation. Environ Pollut 120(3):551–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He G, Yang X, Shaw CY (2005) Material emission parameters obtained through regression. Indoor Built Environ 14(1):59–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellweg S, Demou E, Bruzzi R, Meijer A, Rosenbaum RK, Huijbregts MAJ, McKone TE (2009) Integrating human indoor air pollutant exposure within life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43(6):1670–1679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hun DE, Corsi RL, Morandi MT, Siegel JA (2010) Formaldehyde in residences: long-term indoor concentrations and influencing factors. Indoor Air 20(3):196–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2001) Indoor air—part 3: determination of formaldehyde and other carbonyl compounds - Active sampling method (ISO 16000–3:2001). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2004) Indoor air—part 6: determination of volatile organic compounds in indoor and test chamber air by active sampling on Tenax TA sorbent, thermal desorption and gas chromatography using MS/FID (ISO 16000–6:2004). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006a) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044:2006). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006b) Indoor air—part 9: determination of the emission of volatile organic compounds from building products and furnishing—emission test chamber method (ISO 16000–9:2006). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (2006c) Indoor air—part 11: determination of the emission of volatile organic compounds from building products and furnishing—sampling, storage of samples and preparation of test specimens (ISO 16000–11:2006). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen RB, Bjørseth O (1999) Sorption behaviour of volatile organic compounds on material surfaces—the influence of combinations of compounds and materials compared to sorption of single compounds on single materials. Environ Int 25:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen RB, Bjørseth O, Malvik B (1999) Chamber testing of adsorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on material surfaces. Indoor Air 9(1):2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen RB, Dokka TH, Bjørseth O (2000) Introduction of a sink–diffusion model to describe the interaction between VOCs and material surfaces. Indoor Air 10:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim I, Hur T (2009) Integration of working environment into life cycle assessment framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(4):290–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn BM (2008) Stronger formaldehyde regulation sought. JAMA 299(17):2015–2015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer A, Huijbregts MAJ, Reijnders L (2005) Human health damages due to indoor sources of organic compounds and radioactivity in life cycle impact assessment of dwellings—part 1: characterisation factors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(5):309–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1991) Human exposure assessment for airborne pollutants: advances and opportunities. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordic Ecolabelling (2011a) Nordic Ecolabelling of furniture and fitments. Nordic Ecolabelling, Oslo

  • Nordic Ecolabelling (2011b) Nordic Ecolabelling of panels for the building, decoration and furniture industries. Nordic Ecolabelling, Oslo

  • Øie L (1998) The ventilation rate of 344 Oslo residences. Indoor Air 8(3):190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PE International (2011) GaBi. http://www.gabi-software.com. Accessed 20 September 2012

  • Rosenbaum R, Bachmann T, Gold L, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen H, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone T, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild M (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg T, Westerdahl J, Hallberg E, Öman A, Andersson PL, Haglund P, Holmgren T, Fuhrman F, Molander S, Tivander J (2012) Emissions of additives from plastics in the societal material stock: a case study for Sweden. In: Bilitewski B, Darbra RM, Barceló D (eds) The handbook of environmental chemistry volume 18. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarela K, Tirkkonen T (2004) M1, emission classification of building materials: protocol for chemical and sensory testing of building materials. VTT, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthammer T, Mentese S, Marutzky R (2010) Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chem Rev 110(4):2536–2572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton K, Adgate JL, Church TR, Ashley DL, Needham LL, Ramachandran G, Fredrickson AL, Ryan AD (2005) Children’s exposure to volatile organic compounds as determined by longitudinal measurements in blood. Environ Health Perspect 113(3):342–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton K, Adgate JL, Ramachandran G, Pratt GC, Mongin SJ, Stock TH, Morandi MT (2003) Comparison of personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to hazardous air pollutants in three urban communities. Environ Sci Technol 38(2):423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer BC, Hodgson AT, Hotchi T, Ming KY, Sextro RG, Wood EE, Brown NJ (2007) Sorption of organic gases in residential rooms. Atmos Environ 41(15):3251–3265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (2010) SPSS 14.0 for Windows

  • Tichenor BA, Guo Z (1991) The effect of ventilation on emission rates of wood finishing materials. Environ Int 17(4):317–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor BA, Guo Z, Dorsey JA (1992) Emission rates of mercury from latex paints. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor BA, Guo Z, Dunn JE, Sparkds LE, Mason MA (1991) The interaction of vapour phase organic compounds with indoor sinks. Indoor Air 1:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEtox (2011) USEtoxTM model. http://www.usetox.org. Accessed 8 February 2011

  • Wenger Y, Li D, Jolliet O (2012) Indoor intake fraction considering surface sorption of air organic compounds for life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(7):919–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2010) WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. The WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The PhD position of Christofer Skaar is part of a research programme sponsored by the Norwegian Research Council. Project name: C(S)R in global value chains, a conceptual and operational approach. Project number: 171658.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Christofer Skaar & Rikke B. Jørgensen

Authors
  1. Christofer Skaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rikke B. Jørgensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christofer Skaar.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Michael Z. Hauschild

Electronic supplementary material

The Supplementary Material contains details on the measured emission rates (Table S1), the evaluation of goodness of fit of the emissions models using R 2 (Table S2), a comparison of the USEtox effect factors to LCI values from ECA (1997), AgBB (2010) and Afsset (2009) (Table S3), impacts in the use stage over a 70 year time span (Table S4), impacts in the use stage over a 15 year time span (Table S5) and LCA results for the production and disposal stages (Table S6).

ESM 1

(DOCX 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skaar, C., Jørgensen, R.B. Integrating human health impact from indoor emissions into an LCA: a case study evaluating the significance of the use stage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 636–646 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0506-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0506-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation