Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Methods for assessing the energy-saving efficiency of industrial symbiosis in industrial parks

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The available energy resources are being depleted worldwide. Industrial symbiosis (IS) provides a promising approach for increasing the efficiency of energy utilization, with numerous studies reporting the superiority of this technology. However, studies quantifying the energy-saving efficiency of IS remain insufficient. This paper proposes an index system for the quantitative evaluation of the energy-saving efficiency of IS. Both energy-saving and financial indexes were selected, the former include the IS energy-saving index, the contribution rate of energy saved through IS, fractional energy savings, and cut rate of energy consumption per total output value; and the latter include the IS investment payback period, IS input–output ratio, net present value (NPV), and internal rate of return (IRR) of IS. The proposed methods were applied to a case study on the XF Industrial Park (XF IP), in the city of Liaocheng in Shandong Province of China. Three energy-saving channels using IS were found in the XF IP: (a) utilizing the energy of high-temperature materials among industrial processes, (b) recovering waste heat and steam between different processes, and (c) saving energy by sharing infrastructures. The results showed that the energy efficiency index of IS was 0.326, accounting for 34.6 % of the comprehensive energy-saving index in 2011, and the fractional energy-savings were 12.42 %. The index of energy consumption per total industrial output value varied from 90.9 tce/MRMB to 51.6 tce/MRMB. Thus, the cut rate of energy consumption per total industrial output value was 43.42 %. The average values of the IS input–output ratio was 406.2 RMB/tce, 57.2 % lower than the price of standard coal. Static investment payback period in the XF IP was 8.5 months, indicating that the XF IP began to earn profit 8.5 months after the construction of all IS modes. The NVP and IRR of each IS mode in the XF IP were greater than zero, with average values equal to 1,789.96 MRMB and 140.96 %, respectively. The computation result for each indicator revealed that IS could lead to the use of energy with high efficiency and lighten the financial burden of enterprises in the XF IP. And the proposed index system may help IPs and EIPs to make strategic decisions when designing IS modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews-Speed P (2009) China’s ongoing energy efficiency drive: origins, progress and prospects. Energy Policy 37:1331–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons F, Spekkink W, Mouzakitis Y (2011) The dynamics of industrial symbiosis: a proposal for a conceptual framework based upon a comprehensive literature review. J Clean Prod 19:905–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertow MR (2000) Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:313–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertow MR (2007) “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 11:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertow MR, Ashton W, Kuppalli R (2004) The industrial symbiosis research symposium at Yale: advancing the study of industry and environment. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan Z, Duan N, Guo Y, Li X (2010) A quantitative evaluation method based decomposition analysis and its application on the life-cycle effect of energy conservation and emission reduction. China Environ Sci 30:852–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong L, Zhang H, Fujita T, Ohnishi S, Li H, Fujii M, Dong H (2013) Environmental and economic gains of industrial symbiosis for Chinese iron/steel industry: Kawasaki’s experience and practice in Liuzhou and Jinan. J Clean Prod 59:226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong L, Gu F, Fujita T, Hayashi Y, Gao J (2014) Uncovering opportunity of low-carbon city promotion with industrial system innovation: case study on industrial symbiosis projects in China. Energy Policy 65:388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Zhang P, Ulgiati S, Sarkis J (2010) Emergy analysis of an industrial park: the case of Dalian, China. Sci Total Environ 408:5273–5283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper E, Graedel T (2004) Industrial ecology: a teenager’s progress. Technol Soc 26:433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen PD, Basson L, Hellawell EE, Bailey MR, Leach M (2011) Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: experiences from the United Kingdom’s national industrial symbiosis programme. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:703–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Lin B (2012) China’s energy demand and its characteristics in the industrialization and urbanization process. Energy Policy 49:608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson MT, Söderström M (2011) Options for the Swedish steel industry–energy efficiency measures and fuel conversion. Energy 36:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson M, Wolf A (2008) Using an optimization model to evaluate the economic benefits of industrial symbiosis in the forest industry. J Clean Prod 16:1536–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen J, Snäkin J-P (2005) Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: concepts and application. Ecol Econ 52:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Bao W, Xiu C, Zhang Y, Xu H (2010) Energy conservation and circular economy in China’s process industries. Energy 35:4273–4281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Du J, Wei Y (2013) Energy conservation in China: key provincial sectors at two-digit level. Appl Energy 104:457–465

  • Lin GC, Nagalingam SV (2000) CIM justification and optimisation. CRC Press. Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Li W (2006) The analysis of China’s energy consumption status and structure. Land Resour Inf 12:39–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Zhang L, Wang L, Zhao J, Ma L, Tang Z, Gao B, Yu J (2010) A sketch map of low-carbon economic development in China. Geogr Res 29:778–788

  • Liu Q, Jiang P, Zhao J, Zhang B, Bian H, Qian G (2011) Life cycle assessment of an industrial symbiosis based on energy recovery from dried sludge and used oil. J Clean Prod 19:1700–1708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo K, Wang MY (2013) Energy conservation in China’s Twelfth Five-Year Plan period: continuation or paradigm shift? Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission) (2004) China medium and long-term energy conservation plan. Beijing

  • Ng RT, Ng DK, Tan RR, El-Halwagi MM (2013) Disjunctive fuzzy optimisation for planning and synthesis of industrial symbiosis in bioenergy systems. J Environ Chem Eng 2:652–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquin RL, Busch T, Tilleman SG (2013) Creating economic and environmental value through industrial symbiosis. Long Range Planning

  • Park H-S, Behera SK (2014) Methodological aspects of applying eco-efficiency indicators to industrial symbiosis networks. J Clean Prod 64:478–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proops JL (1984) Energy intensities, input–output analysis and economic development. University of Keele, Department of Economics

  • Rao X, Wu J, Zhang Z, Liu B (2011) Energy efficiency and energy saving potential in China: an analysis based on slacks-based measure model. Comput Ind Eng 63:578–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SBEP(State Bureau of Environmental Protection of China) (1996) Cleaner production audit manual for enterprise. China Environmental Science Press. Beijing

  • Sokka L, Pakarinen S, Melanen M (2011) Industrial symbiosis contributing to more sustainable energy use—an example from the forest industry in Kymenlaakso, Finland. J Clean Prod 19:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian L, Jin R (2012) Theoretical exploration of carbon emissions dynamic evolutionary system and evolutionary scenario analysis. Energy 40:376–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trokanas N, Cecelja F, Raafat T (2014) Semantic input/output matching for waste processing in industrial symbiosis. Comput Chem Eng 66:259–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • URL (Uniform Resource Locator) (2013–12-22) http://baike.baidu.com/view/43725.htm?fr=aladdin

  • Usón S, Valero A, Agudelo A (2012) Thermoeconomics and Industrial Symbiosis. Effect of by-product integration in cost assessment. Energy 45:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Z, Meng X (2014) Quantitative assessment of industrial symbiosis for the promotion of circular economy: a case study of the printed circuit boards industry in China’s Suzhou New District. J Clean Prod http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652614002625

  • Yang S, Feng N (2008) A case study of industrial symbiosis: Nanning Sugar Co., Ltd. in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Dong L, Li H, Fujita T, Ohnishi S, Tang Q (2013) Analysis of low-carbon industrial symbiosis technology for carbon mitigation in a Chinese iron/steel industrial park: a case study with carbon flow analysis. Energy Policy 61:1400–1411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper could not have been completed without the comprehensive cooperation and support from the XF IP and the local EPA. We also appreciate the academic and theoretical support from Dr. Li Zhu, Dr. Fei Yu, and Dr. Xiaohua Ren as regards the methods and indexes of research, and the English revision by Dr. Pamela Holt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, No.27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, 250100, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Wenfeng Li, Zhaojie Cui & Feng Han

Authors
  1. Wenfeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhaojie Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feng Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaojie Cui.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Cui, Z. & Han, F. Methods for assessing the energy-saving efficiency of industrial symbiosis in industrial parks. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 275–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3327-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3327-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation