Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

SEER: spectrum- and energy-efficient routing protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHNs) were developed to improve the utilization ratio of licensed spectrum. Since spectrum opportunities for users are varied over time and location, enhancing the spectrum effectiveness is a goal and also a challenge for CRAHNs. Besides, due to the energy limitation of the devices in CRAHNs, energy efficiency is another goal to be achieved. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to design a spectrum- and energy-efficient routing (SEER) protocol for CRAHNs, which improves transmission efficiency and balances energy consumption. The design of the protocol uses the techniques of expected transmission power, expected residual lifetime and utility indifference curves. The protocol will select the optimal route from all candidate paths. We present a performance comparison with two existing protocols for CARHNs: the minimum total transmission power (MTTP) and the min–max battery cost (MMBC) protocols. Simulation results show that SEER can reduce energy consumption by almost 40 % than that of MMBC, and increase network lifetime by almost 200 % than that of MTTP. Besides, SEER can improve the network throughput by at least 50 % and 150 % than that of MTTP and MMBC respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W. Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Elsevier Computer Networks, 50, 2127–2159.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W. Y., & Chowdhury, K. R. (2009). CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks, 7(5), 810–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamruzzaman, S. M., Eunhee, K., & Dong G. J. (2011) Spectrum and energy aware routing protocol for CRAHNs, IEEE International Conference Communications (ICC).

  4. Cesana, M., Cuomo, F., & Ekici, E. (2011). Routing in cognitive radio networks: Challenges and solutions. Ad Hoc Networks, 9(3), 228–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chowdhury, A. R., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2011). CRP: a routing protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 29(4), 794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahmoodi, T. (2011). Energy-aware routing in the cognitive packet network. Performance Evaluation, 63(4), 338–346.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelenbe, E., & Lent, R. (2004). Power-aware ad hoc cognitive packet networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 2(3), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pyo, C.W., Hasegawa, M. (2007) Minimum weight routing based on a common link control radio for cognitive wireless ad hoc networks, in: IWCMC’07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, pp. 399–404.

  9. Chiaraviglio, L., Matta I. (2010) GreenCoop: Cooperative green routing with energy-efficient servers. Proceedings of ACM First International Conference on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking (e-Energy’10), NY, USA.

  10. Liu, K. J. R., & Wang, B. (2010). Cognitive radio networking and security: A game-theoretic view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamruzzaman, S. M., Eunhee K, Dong G. J. An energy efficient QoS routing protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks, International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

  12. Tabrizi, H. Joint cooperative routing and energy-aware routing for maximizing wireless network lifetime, Standford Unviersity, Technical Report [Online]. www.stanford.edu/htabrizi/report.pdf.

  13. Khattab, A., Perkins, D., Bayoumi, M. (2013) Opportunistic spectrum access challenges in distributed cognitive radio networks, Cognitive Radio Networks Analog Circuits and Signal Processing, 33–39.

  14. Lo, B. F., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2013). Reinforcement learning for cooperative sensing gain in cognitive radio ad hoc networks. Wireless Networks (Springer), 19(6), 1237–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guan, Q., Yu, F. R., Jiang, S., & Wei, G. (2010). Prediction-based topology control and routing in cognitive radio mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(9), 4443–4452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, D. K., & Adachi, F. (2001). Theoretical analysis of reverse link capacity for an sir-based power-controlled cellular CDMA system in a multipath fading environment. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 50(2), 452–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pätzold, M., Szczepanski, A., & Youssef, N. (2002). Methods for modeling of specified and measured multipath power-delay profiles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 50(5), 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding, L., Melodia, T., et al. (2010). Cross-layer routing and dynamic spectrum allocation in cognitive radio ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(4), 1969–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu, A., Wei, D., Kuo C., (2007) A cognitive MAC protocol using statistical channel allocation for wireless ad-hoc networks. Proceedings of the IEEE WCNC.

  20. Kim, D., et al. (2003). Routing mechanisms for mobile ad hoc networks based on the energy drain rate. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, D., et al. (2002) Power-aware routing based on the energy drain rate for mobile ad hoc networks. Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pp. 565–569.

  22. Colletter, Y., & Siany, P. (2003). Multiobjective optimization: Principles and case studies, decision engineering. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hou, Y., Shi, Y., Pan, J., Efrat, A., & Midkiff, S. (2006). Maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks through single-session flow routing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5(9), 1255–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cano, J.-C., Manzoni, P. (2000) A Performance comparison of energy consumption for mobile ad hoc network routing protocols. Proceedings of MASCOTS, pp. 57–63.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by City University Strategic Research Grant No. 7002734.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    L. Hou & K. H. Yeung

  2. The Open University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    K. Y. Wong

Authors
  1. L. Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. H. Yeung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Y. Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, L., Yeung, K.H. & Wong, K.Y. SEER: spectrum- and energy-efficient routing protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks. Wireless Netw 21, 2357–2368 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-0906-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-0906-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation