Skip to main content
Log in

Antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of poultry isolates of Salmonella by RAPD-PCR

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 September 2019

Abstract

The antibiotic resistance profile of 17 poultry isolates of Salmonella was studied against 24 different antibiotics. 69–88% of the Salmonella isolates displayed a high level of resistance, particularly against penicillin, rifampicin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, sulphamethoxazole and vancomycin. In contrast, a relatively low or moderate level of resistance was observed against furazolidone, spectinomycin, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, cefepime, carbenicillin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, oxacillin and cephalothin (11–59%). Moreover, resistance to multiple antibiotics (2–5) was also observed among the Salmonella strains, and none of the isolates was found susceptible to all the antibiotics used. Similarity coefficient among Salmonella strains by RAPD-PCR analysis varied from 0.60 to 0.86, and all the salmonellae could be classified into seven groups on the basis of dendrogram analysis. Generally, a very high level of concordance between RAPD-PCR profile and antibiotic profile was not observed, which indicates that genes for antibiotic resistance may not always be present on genomic DNA rather may be plasmid-borne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajaj BK, Sharma V, Koul S, Thakur RL (2003a) Incidence of Salmonella in poultry and meats and growth inhibition of Salmonella enteritidis by organic acids. J Food Sci Technol 40:556–558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj BK, Sharma V, Thakur RL (2003b) Prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella sp. in poultry eggs. J Food Sci Technol 40:682–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M (1966) Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am Clin Pathol 45:493–496

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Betancor L, Schelotto F, Martinez A, Pereira M, Algorta G, Rodríguez A, Vignoli R, Chabalgoity JA (2004) Random amplified polymorphic DNA and phenotyping analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates collected from humans and poultry in Uruguay from 1995 to 2002. J Clin Microbiol 42:1155–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carraminana JJ, Rota C, Agustín I, Herrera A (2004) High prevalence of multiple resistance to antibiotics in Salmonella serovars isolated from a poultry slaughterhouse in Spain. Vet Microbiol 104:133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fluit AC (2005) Towards more virulent and antibiotic-resistant Salmonella? FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 43:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landeras E, Gonzalez Hevia MA, Mendoza MC (1998) Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis: relationship between food, water and pathogenic strains. Int J Food Microbiol 43:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Minor L (1984) Salmonella lignieres. In: Kreig NR, Holt JG (eds) Bergeyȁ9s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 1. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 427–458. ISBN 0683041088

  • Ling JM, Koo IC, Kam KM, Cheng AF (1998) Antimicrobial susceptibilities and molecular epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis strains isolated in Hong Kong from 1986 to 1996. J Clin Microbiol 36:1693–1699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mare L, Dicks LMT, Vander Walt ML (2001) Characterization of South African isolaletes of Salmonella enteritidis by phage typing, numerical analysis of RAPD-PCR banding patterns and plasmid profiles. Int J Food Microbiol 64:237–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczyk A, Radkowski M (2002) Salmonella spp. on chicken carcasses in processing plants in Poland. J Food Protect 65:1475–1479

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto T, Tian HZ, Okabe T, Trevanich S, Asoh K, Tomoda S, Honjoh K, Shoji H (1998) Application of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis for detection of Salmonella spp. in foods. J Food Protect 61:785–791

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mrema N, Mpuchane S, Gashe BA (2006) Prevalence of Salmonella in raw minced meat, raw fresh sausages and raw burger patties from retail outletsin Gaborone, Botswana. Food Control 17:217–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith OS, Smith JSC, Bowen SL, Tenbor RA, Wall SJ (1990) Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1grain yield, heterosis and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80:833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto SM, Gonzalez-Hevia MA, Mendoza MC (2003) Antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis: relationships between mutations conferring quinolone resistance, integrons, plasmids and genetic types. J Antimicrob Agents Chemoth 51:1287–1291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White DG, Zhao S, Simjee S, Wagner DD, McDermott PF (2002) Antimicrobial resistance of food borne pathogens. Microbes Infect 4:405–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K (1987) Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In: Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore BD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (eds) Current protocols in molecular biology. John and Wiley & Sons, New York. pp 2.4.1–2.4.2. ISBN 0471632481

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors thank the Head, Department of Biotechnology, University of Jammu, Jammu, for providing all the necessary laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bijender K. Bajaj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thakur, Y.R., Bajaj, B.K. Antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of poultry isolates of Salmonella by RAPD-PCR. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22, 1177–1183 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9159-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9159-8

Keywords

Navigation