Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A New Integrated MADM Technique Combined with ANP, FTOPSIS and Fuzzy Max-Min Set Method for Evaluating Water Transfer Projects

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In sustainable water resources management, it is essential to rank inter-basin water transfer projects. This task is difficult due to many different conflict criteria, complex relations among criteria and various judgments of decision makers. In this paper, an integrated multiple attribute group decision making method consists of ANP (Analytical Network Process), fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy max-min set methods is proposed for evaluating water transfer projects. A set of over 60 criteria in social, environmental and economic sectors are used for ranking four water transfer projects in Karun River based on three decision maker judgments. A key novelty of the proposed methodology is its ability to model both complex relations among different criteria in water management and the influence of decision maker judgments’ weights on the final ranking in group decision making problem. The procedure starts by obtaining the priority of water transfer projects and the weight of each decision maker judgments by employing ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS, respectively. These weights are used as inputs in the fuzzy max-min set method. Then the effects of decision maker weights on the final ranking are determined in fuzzy environment. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of decision makers’ weights has been conducted. The results show that the proposed method is an effective tool for group decision making problems by considering different criteria and decision makers’ weights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abed-Elmdoust A, Kerachian R (2014) Evaluating the relative power of water users in inter-basin water transfer systems. Water Resour Manag 28(2):495–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrishamchi A, Tajrishy M (2005) Interbasin water transfers in Iran. Water Conservation, Reuse, and Recycling: Proceedings of an Iranian-American Workshop 252–272

  • Afshar A, Marino MA, Saadatpour M, Afshar A (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resour Manag 25:545–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos KP, Petalas C, Pisinaras V (2005) Water resources planning using the AHP and PROMETHEE multi criteria methods: The case of NESTOS River- GREECE. The 7th Balkan Conference on Operational Research. BACOR 05. Constanta, May 2005, Romania

  • Bender MJ, Simonovic SP (2000) A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan N, Rai K (2004) Strategic decision making applying the analytic hierarchy process. Springer- Verlog, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen TC (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. J of Fuzzy Sets and Syst 114(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary VM, Chakraborthy D, Jeyaram A, Krishna Murthy YVN, Sharma JR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Multi-criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3555–3571

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Hong WP, Lee KS, Burian SJ (2011) Integrated use of a continuous simulation model and multi-attribute decision-making for ranking urban watershed management alternatives. Water Resour Manag 25(2):641–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell EO, Bathurst J, Kilsby C, Parkin G, Quinn P, Younger P, Anderson S, Riley M (2000) Integrating mesoscale catchments experiments with modeling: the potential for sustainable water resources management, fifth IHP/IAHS George Kovacs colloquium, HELP, international hydrological programme. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng G, Wardlaw R (2013) Application of multi-criterion decision making analysis to integrated water resources management. Water Resour Manag 27(8):3191–3207

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemi F, White I (2007) Inter-basin water transfer case studies from Australia, United States, Canada, China and India. International Hydrology series

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566

    Google Scholar 

  • Horenbeek AV, Pintelon L (2014) Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega 42:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Thomas T, Galkate RV, Ghosh NC, Singh S (2014) Watershed prioritization using Saaty’s AHP based decision support for soil conservation measures. Water Resour Manag 28(2):475–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Javadi AA, Dambatta AB (2008) Analytic Hierarchy Process for the sustainability appraisal of contaminated land intelligent computing and engineering, ICE 360–369

  • Krohling RA, Campanharo VC (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: a case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert Syst with Appl 38:4190–4197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montazar A, Zadbagher E (2010) An analytical hierarchy model for assessing global water productivity of irrigation networks in Iran. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s112 6 9 -010-9581-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodanovic P, Siminovic SP (2002) Comparison of fuzzy set ranking methods of implementation in water resources decision- making. Can J Civ Eng 29(5):692–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prodanovic P, Siminovic SP (2003) Fuzzy compromise programming for group decision making. IEEE transact on syst, man and cybern- part A: syst and hum 33(3):358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj AP, Kumar ND (1999) Ranking alternatives with fuzzy weights using maximizing set and minimizing set. J Fuzzy sets and syst 105:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju SK, Duckstien L, Arondel C (2000) Multicreterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning : a case study in Spain. Water Resour Manag 14:435–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Razavi Toosi SL, Samani JMV (2012) Evaluating water transfer projects using analytic network process (ANP). Water Resour Manag 26:1999–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Razavi Toosi SL, Samani JMV, Koorehpazan Dezfuli A (2009) Ranking water transfer projects using fuzzy methods, ICE Water management WM4 (163):189–97

  • Roozbahani A, Zahraie B, Tabesh M (2012) PROMETHEE with precedence order in the criteria (PPOC) as a New group decision making Aid: an application in urban water supply management. Water Resour Manag 26(12):3581–3599

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process: the organization and prioritization of complexity. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TS, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process, economic, political, social and technological. Opportunities, Costs and Risks, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC., Applications with Benefits

    Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Medeiros YDP (2008) Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manag 22:877–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Medeiros YDP, Faria AS (2004) An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resour Manag 18:35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng ML, Chiang J, Lan LW (2009) Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral. Comput Ind Eng 57:330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JL, Tzeng GH (2011) An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Syst with Appl 38:1417–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Abrishamchi A, Ardakanian R (2008) Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management. Water Resour Manag 22:1017–1029

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water Structures Engineering Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    S. L. Razavi Toosi & J. M. V. Samani

Authors
  1. S. L. Razavi Toosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. V. Samani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Razavi Toosi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razavi Toosi, S.L., Samani, J.M.V. A New Integrated MADM Technique Combined with ANP, FTOPSIS and Fuzzy Max-Min Set Method for Evaluating Water Transfer Projects. Water Resour Manage 28, 4257–4272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0742-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0742-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation