Skip to main content
Log in

How do tests and summary writing tasks enhance long-term retention of students with different levels of test anxiety?

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Testing has been found to facilitate students’ long-term retention of information. However, the learning performance of highly test-anxious students can be impaired by tests. Thus, these students may learn ineffectively in a testing context. By contrast, summary writing may not trigger test anxiety and is therefore another learning strategy to enhance students’ retention. This study compared the effectiveness of tests and summary writing tasks in enhancing the long-term retention of students with different levels of test anxiety. The participants included 133 students (aged 12–14) at a college in Hong Kong. The participants completed the test anxiety inventory (Spielberger in Test anxiety inventory: preliminary professional manual, 1980) to measure their level of test anxiety. They were then randomly assigned into three training groups: testing, summarizing and control groups. At the end of the training sessions, we assessed the effectiveness of the testing and summary writing tasks for participants with different levels of test anxiety. The results indicated that the less test-anxious participants in the testing condition performed better in the posttest than those in the summarizing condition, whereas the highly test anxious participants in the testing condition did not outperform the participants in the summarizing condition. Moreover, both highly test-anxious participants and less test anxious participants in the summarizing condition outperformed those in the control condition. The participants in the control condition demonstrated the lowest performance regardless of their test anxiety level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M. S., & Mohsin, M. N. (2013). Test anxiety inventory (TAI): Factor analysis and psychometric properties. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(1), 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 74(1), 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednall, T. C., & Kehoe, E. J. (2011). Effects of self-regulatory instructional aids on self-directed study. Instructional Science, 39, 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and peformance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435–459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, J. D. (1983). The developmental of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4/5), 514–527. doi:10.1080/09541440701326097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. W. (2008). Brief report: A simple stimulus for student writing and learning in the introductory psychology course. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, J. C. (2004). The influence of cognitive test anxiety across the learning–testing cycle. Learning and Instruction, 14, 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCaro, M. S., Rotar, K. E., Kendra, M. S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Diagnosing and alleviating the impact of performance pressure on mathematical problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(8), 1619–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durst, R. K., & Newell, G. E. (1989). The uses of function: James Britton’s category system and research on writing. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folse, K. S. (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. Tesol Quarterly, 40(2), 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, R. (2001). Effects of strategy instruction on summary writing of college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend, R. (2002). Summing it up: Teaching summary writing to enhance science learning. The Science Teacher, 69, 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y. (2013). The effect of summary writing on reading comprehension: the role of mediation in EFL classroom. Reading Improvement, 50(2), 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., Linehan, M. M., & Smith, J. L. (1978). Reduction of test anxiety through cognitive restructuring. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56, 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, S. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Retrieval (sometimes) enhances learning: Performance pressure reduces the benefits of retrieval practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2011). Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests. Memory, 19(3), 290–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 877–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E. (1998). Differential stability of individual differences in state and trait anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, S. (2008). Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change. Linguistics and Education, 19(4), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. E. (1923). The effects of examination on the performance of learning. Archives of Psychology, 10, 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee. Y.-J. (2007). Solar System. Retrieve from http://home.educities.edu.tw/listeve/Htm/Space/neptune-title.htm.

  • Leeming, F. C. (2002). The exam-a-day procedure improves performance in psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 210–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäntylä, T., & Nilsson, L. G. (1988). Cue distinctiveness and forgetting: Effectiveness of self-generated retrieval cues in delayed recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 502–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. (Ed.). (1984). Writing across the curriculum pamphlets. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrindle, A. R., & Christensen, C. A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. W., Davis, M. A., & Hutchings, C. H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 541–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reaves, R. R., Flowers, J., & Jewell, L. (1993). Effects of writing-to-learn activities on the content knowledge, retention, and attitudes of secondary vocational agriculture students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 34(3), 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45(9), 1043–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhance learning. Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., & Stoops, R. (1978). Test anxiety and the passage of time. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeds, M. A., & Backman, D. E. (2013). The solar system. Boston, Mass.: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Test anxiety inventory: Preliminary professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (1995). Text anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Washington, DC: Hemisphere/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirgel, A. S., & Delaney, P. F. (2014). Does writing summaries improve memory for text? Educational Psychology Review,. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9290-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. L., Myers, A. C., & Culley, M. R. (2010). Enhanced learning and retention through “writing to learn” in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, C. S., & Pu, X. (2012). The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition & Instruction, 22, 333–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waywood, A. (1992). Journal writing and learning mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weems, C. F., Scott, B. G., Graham, R. A., Banks, D. M., Russell, J. D., Taylor, L. K., et al. (2014). Fitting anxious emotion-focused intervention into the ecology of schools: Results from a test anxiety program evaluation. Prevention Science, 16(2), 200–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weems, C. F., Taylor, L. K., Costa, N. M., Marks, A. B., Romano, D. M., Verrett, S. L., et al. (2009). Effect of a school-based test anxiety intervention in ethnic minority youth exposed to Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 218–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C., Culatta, B., Lawrence, B., & Hall-Kenyon, K. (2010). Summarizing expository texts. Topics in Language Disorders, 30, 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wormeli, R. (2004). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning. Alexander: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winnie Wai Lan Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mok, W.S.Y., Chan, W.W.L. How do tests and summary writing tasks enhance long-term retention of students with different levels of test anxiety?. Instr Sci 44, 567–581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9393-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9393-x

Keywords

Navigation