Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Time in therapeutic range as a marker for thrombotic and bleeding outcomes in Fontan patients

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fontan patients managed with warfarin are at risk not only for thrombotic events, but also for bleeding episodes as a consequence of anticoagulation treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether time spent in patient specified therapeutic range (TTR), when managed in a cardiology-based pharmacist managed anticoagulation clinic (PMAC), is a useful target metric for monitoring, as well as improving outcomes. A single center retrospective review was conducted evaluating TTR of all Fontan patients (n = 45) on warfarin managed in our outpatient cardiology pharmacist managed anticoagulation clinic (PMAC) during a 19 month time frame. The primary outcome was time spent within, above, and below therapeutic range. Secondary outcomes were thrombotic event (TE) incidence pre- and post PMAC enrollment and bleeding event incidence during PMAC management. Of the Fontan patients included, 55.6% were male and the median age at latest anticoagulation clinic follow-up was 19 years (IQR 13, 29). A composite 52.9 patient years of warfarin therapy was evaluated during the study time frame. The mean TTR for patients was 84.1 ± 5.2%. The most frequent reasons for non-therapeutic INRs were diet changes (42.8%), medication non-compliance (13.7%), and drug interactions (8.8%). Only one TE occurred during the study time frame. The incidence of TE in this population was decreased after PMAC enrollment (1 per 52.9 patient year versus 1 event per 17.4 patient year; p < 0.0002). Two major bleeds that required emergency department visit occurred during this time, none were cerebral or gastrointestinal. In Fontan patients anticoagulated with warfarin, a greater than 80% TTR can be achieved in a PMAC. Such high time in therapeutic range was associated with excellent outcomes, despite the obvious complexity of this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PMAC:

Pharmacist managed anticoagulation clinic

TTR:

Time in therapeutic range

INR:

International normalized ratio

TEE:

Transesophageal echocardiogram

SD:

Standard deviation

TE:

Thrombotic event

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Firdouse M, Agarwal A, Chan AK, Mondal T (2014) Thrombosis and thromboembolic complications in Fontan patients: a literature review. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 20:484–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Monagle P, Cochrane A, Roberts R et al (2011) A multicenter, randomized trial comparing heparin/warfarin and acetylsalicylic acid as primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the fontan procedure in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:645–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alsaied T, Alsidawi S, Allen CC, Faircloth J, Palumbo JS, Veldtman GR (2015) Strategies for thromboprophylaxis in Fontan circulation: a meta-analysis. Heart 101:1731–1737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Potter BJ, Leong-Sit P, Fernandes SM et al (2013) Effect of aspirin and warfarin therapy on thromboembolic events in patients with univentricular hearts and Fontan palliation. Int J Cardiol 168:3940–3943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J et al (2008) Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation 118:2029–2037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. White HD, Gruber M, Feyzi J et al (2007) Comparison of outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin therapy according to anticoagulant control: results from SPORTIF III and V. Arch Intern Med 167:239–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Veeger NJ, Piersma-Wichers M, Tijssen JG, Hillege HL, van der Meer J (2005) Individual time within target range in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists: main determinant of quality of anticoagulation and predictor of clinical outcome. A retrospective study of 2300 consecutive patients with venous thromboembolism. Br J Haematol 128:513–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose AJ, Hylek EM, Ozonoff A et al (2011) Risk-adjusted percent time in therapeutic range as a quality indicator for outpatient oral anticoagulation: results of the Veterans Affairs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 4(1):22–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti G (2008) Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133:160S–198S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dib JG, Mohammed K, Momattin HI, Alshehri AM (2014) Implementation of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in a saudi arabian health center. Hospital Pharm 49:260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCrindle BW, Manlhiot C, Cochrane A et al (2013) Factors associated with thrombotic complications after the Fontan procedure: a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized trial of primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, Briet E (1993) A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 69:236–239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Turakhia MP (2011) Quality of stroke prevention care in atrial fibrillation: many moving targets. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 4:5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pokorney SD, Simon DN, Thomas L et al (2015) Patients’ time in therapeutic range on warfarin among US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from ORBIT-AF registry. American Heart Journal 170:141–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Asarcıklı L, Şen T, İpek E et al (2013) Time in therapeutic range (TTR) value of patients who use warfarin and factors which influence TTR. J Am Coll Cardiol 18(62):C127–C128. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.382.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Macedo AF, Bell J, McCarron C et al (2015) Determinants of oral anticoagulation control in new warfarin patients: analysis using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Thromb Res. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.007

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barta AL, Nutescu EA, Thompson PA, Bussey HI, Gulseth MP (2015) Relationship between time spent at extreme International Normalized Ratios and time in therapeutic range with bleeding and thrombosis in warfarin-treated patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 72(14):1188–1194. doi:10.2146/ajhp140752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy U, Mallepaddi NR, Chevassut TJ (2015) High INR on warfarin. BMJ 350:h1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moffett BS, Parham AL, Caudilla CD, Mott AR, Gurwitch KD (2006) Oral anticoagulation in a pediatric hospital: impact of a quality improvement initiative on warfarin management strategies. Qual Saf Health Care 15(4):240–243. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Connolly S, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Granger CB, Alexander JH, MCMurray JV et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Giugliano RP, Ruff C, Braunwald E et al (2013) Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 369:2093–2104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:883–891September

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kauffman YS, Schroeder AE, Witt DM et al (2015) Patient specific factors influencing adherence to INR monitoring. Pharmacotherapy 35(8):740–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bauman ME, Black K, Bauman ML et al (2010) EMPoWarMENT: Edmonton pediatric warfarin self-management pilot study in children with primarily cardiac disease. Thromb Res 126:e110–e115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bauman ME, Massicotte MP, Kuhle S et al (2015) EMPoWARed: Edmonton pediatric warfarin self-management study. Thromb Res 136(5):887–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

All authors take responsibility for the content of the manuscript. All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with submission to the Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. Dr. JF and KM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. TA, NN, RN; JC, RN; TM, PhD; JSP, MD; AAV, PharmD PhD FCP and GRV, MB ChB FRCP reviewed the included studies in the meta-analysis. Dr. CCA critically revised the manuscript. Dr. JSP wrote the hematology part of the manuscript and Dr. GV is the senior author on the manuscript. Dr. GV is the corresponding author.

Funding

The authors received no funding related to this work. There are no relevant financial conflicts. There was no honorarium, grant or other form of payment given to produce the manuscript and no relation to industry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gruschen R. Veldtman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest and no competing interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faircloth, J.M., Miner, K.M., Alsaied, T. et al. Time in therapeutic range as a marker for thrombotic and bleeding outcomes in Fontan patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis 44, 38–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-017-1499-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-017-1499-8

Keywords

Navigation