Abstract
Rudolf Carnap’s Der logische Aufbau der Welt (The Logical Structure of the World) is generally conceived of as being the failed manifesto of logical positivism. In this paper we will consider the following question: How much of the Aufbau can actually be saved? We will argue that there is an adaptation of the old system which satisfies many of the demands of the original programme. In order to defend this thesis, we have to show how a new ‘Aufbau-like’ programme may solve or circumvent the problems that affected the original Aufbau project. In particular, we are going to focus on how a new system may address the well-known difficulties in Carnap’s Aufbau concerning abstraction, dimensionality, and theoretical terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berge C. (1989) Hypergraphs. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Carnap, R. (1928). Der logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin: Weltkreis (R. Carnap, Trans., The logical structure of the world, 1967, trans. by R. George. Berkeley: University of California Press.).
Carnap R. (1929) Abriss der Logistik. Springer, Vienna
Carnap, R. (1936/1937). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 420–268, and 4, 1–40.
Carnap, R. (1959). Theoretical concepts in science. Lecture, published in Psillos (2000).
Carnap R. (1963) Intellectual autobiography. In: Schilpp P. A. (eds) The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Open Court, Peru, IL, pp 3–84
Carnap R. (1966a) Philosophical foundations of physics. Basic Books, New York
Carnap, R. (1966b). On the use of Hilbert’s ϵ-operator in scientific theories. In Y. Bar-Hillel, et al. (Eds.), Essays on the foundations of mathematics (pp. 156–164). Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.
Chalmers D. J., Jackson F. (2001) Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation. Philosophical Review 110: 315–361
Demopoulos W., Friedman M. (1985) Bertrand Russell’s Analysis of matter: Its historical context and contemporary interest. Philosophy of Science 52: 621–639
Eberle R. A. (1975) A construction of quality classes improved upon the Aufbau. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Rudolf Carnap, logical empiricist. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 55–73
Friedman M. (1999) Reconsidering logical positivism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gärdenfors P. (1990) Induction, conceptual spaces, and AI. Philosophy of Science 57: 78–95
Gärdenfors P. (2000) Conceptual spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge
Glymour C. (1980) Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Glymour, C. (1992). Android epistemology: Computation, artificial intelligence, and the philosophy of science. In M. H. Salmon, et al. (Eds.), Introduction to the philosophy of science (pp. 364–403). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Goodman N. (1951) The structure of appearance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Goodman N. (1963) The significance of Der logische Aufbau der Welt. In: Schilpp P. A. (eds) The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Open Court, La Salle, pp 545–558
Goodman N. (1972) Seven strictures on similarity. In: Goodman N. (eds) Problems and projects. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, pp 437–446
Grünbaum A. (1953) Whitehead’s method of extensive abstraction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science IV(15): 215–226
Ketland J. (2004) Empirical adequacy and ramsification. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 287–300
Ladyman J. (2002) Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge, London
Leitgeb H. (2007) A new analysis of quasianalysis. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36(2): 181–226
Leitgeb, H. (2008). Empirical content and its presuppositions. Unpublished draft.
Lewis D. (1970) How to define theoretical terms. The Journal of Philosophy 67(13): 427–446
Lewis D. (1983) New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61(4): 343–377
Matousek J. (2002) Lectures on discrete geometry. Springer, New York
Mellor, D. H., & Oliver, A. (Eds.). (1997). Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Mormann T. (1997) Repräsentation, Struktur, Quasianalyse. Formale Aspekte einer Carnapianischen Konstitutionstheorie. In: Meggle G. (eds) Analyomen 2. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 431–438
Moulines C. U. (1991) Making sense of Carnap’s Aufbau. Erkenntnis 35: 263–286
Papineau D. (1996) Theory-dependent terms. Philosophy of Science 63(1): 1–20
Quine W. V. (1969) Epistemology naturalized. In: Quine W. V. (eds) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 69–90
Quine W. V. (1993) In praise of observation sentences. Journal of Philosophy 90(3): 107–116
Quine W. V. (1995) From stimulus to science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Quine W. V. O. (1951) Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43
Psillos S. (2000) Rudolf Carnap’s ‘Theoretical concepts in science’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31(1): 151–172
Ramsey, F. P. (1931). Theories. In R. B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Reprinted from F. P. Ramsey. Philosophical papers, pp. 112–136, by D. H. Mellor, Ed., 1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Richardson A. (1998) Carnap’s construction of the world: The Aufbau and the emergence of logical empiricism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rodriguez-Pereyra G. (2002) Resemblance nominalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Runggaldier, E. (1984). Carnap’s early conventionalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Russell, B. (1954). The analysis of matter. London: George Allen & Unwin (The analysis of matter appeared first in 1927).
Russell, B. (1961). Our knowledge of the external world. London: George Allen & Unwin (The first edition appeared in 1914).
Schurz, G. (2006). Semantic holism and (non-)compositionality in scientific theories. In M. Werning, et al. (Eds.), The compositionality of meaning and content, Vol. I: Foundational issues (pp. 271–284). Frankfurt: Ontos Press.
Worrall J. (1989) Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica 43: 99–124
Zach R. (2003) The practice of finitism. Epsilon calculus and consistency proofs in Hilbert’s program. Synthese 137: 211–259
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leitgeb, H. New life for Carnap’s Aufbau?. Synthese 180, 265–299 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9605-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9605-x