Skip to main content
Log in

Meaning and Interpretation. I

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is an attempt at a logical explication of some crucial notions of current general semantics and pragmatics. A general, axiomatic, formal-logical theory of meaning and interpretation is outlined in this paper.In the theory, accordingto the token-type distinction of Peirce, language is formalised on two levels: first as a language of token-objects (understood as material, empirical, enduring through time-and space objects) and then – as a language of type-objects (understood as abstract objects, as classes of tokens). The basic concepts of the theory, i.e. the notions: meaning, denotation and interpretation of well-formed expressions (wfes) of the language are formalised on the type-level, by utilising some semantic-pragmatic primitive notions introduced on the token-level. The paper is divided into two parts.In Part Ia theoryof meaningand denotation is proposed, and in Part II - its expansion to the theory of meaning and interpretation is presented.The meaninga wfe is defined as an equivalence class of the relation possessing the same manner of using types (cf. Ajdukiewicz [1934], Wittgenstein [1953]). The concept of denotation is defined by means of the relation of referring which holds between wfe-types and objects of reality described by the given language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajdukiewicz, K.: 1931, ‘O znaczeniu wyra.ze n’ (‘On meaning of expressions’), Księega Pamiąow. atkowa Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego we Lwowie, Lwów

  2. Ajdukiewicz, K.: 1934, ‘Sprache und Sinn’, Erkenntnis IV (1934), 100–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajdukiewicz, K.: 1935, ‘Die syntaktische Konnexität’, Studia Philosophica, Leopoli, vol. 1, 1–27. English translation: ‘Syntactic Connection’, in S. McCall (ed.), Polish Logic 1920–1939, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ajdukiewicz, K.: 1960, ‘Związki składniowe między członami zdań oznajmujacych’ (‘Syntactic Relations Between Elements of Declarative Sentences’), Studia Filozoficzne 6 (21), 76–86. First presented in English at the International Linguistic Symposium in Erfurt, September 27-October 2, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Audi, R. (ed.), 1995, The Cambridge Dictionaryof Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bar-Hillel, Y.: 1950, ‘On Syntactical Categories’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 15, 19–37. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel Y.: 1964, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bar-Hillel, Y.: 1953, ‘A Quasi-arithmetical Notation for Syntactic Description’, Language 29, 47–58. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel Y.: 1964, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bar-Hillel, Y.: 1964, Language and Information. Selected Essays on their Theory and Application, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley Publishing co.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buszkowski, W.: 1988, ‘Three Theories of Categorial Grammar’, in W. Buszkowski, W. Marciszewski, and J. van Benthem (eds.), 57–84.

  10. Buszkowski, W.: 1989, LogicznePodstawy Gramatyk Kategorialnych Ajdukiewicza -Lambeka (Logical Foundations of Ajdukiewicz's -Lambek's Categorial Grammar), Logika i jejZastosowania, PWN, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buszkowski, W., W. Marciszewski, and van Benthem J. (eds.): 1988, Categorial Grammar, John Benjamis Publishing Company, Amsterdam-Philalelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carnap, R.: 1936, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science III, 419–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carnap, R.: 1937, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science IV, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carnap, R.: 1947, Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carnap, R.: 1956, ‘The Theoretical Character of Theoretical Concepts’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science I, 38–76.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Church, A.: 1956, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cresswell, M.J.: 1973, Logics and Languages, Methuen and Co. Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cresswell, M.J.: 1977, ‘Categorial Languages’, Studia Logica 36, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davidson, D.: 1969, ‘Truth and Meaning’, in Davis J.W. et al. (eds.), Philosophical Logic, Massachusetts, Hingham.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson, D.: 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, OUP, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dummett, M.: 1975, ‘What is a Theory of Meaning’, in S. Guttenplan (ed.), Mind and Language, OUP, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dummett, M.: 1976, ‘What is a Theory of Meaning’, II, in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning, OUP, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dummett, M.: 1991, ‘The Logical Basis of Metaphysics’, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dummett, M.: 2003, ‘Truth and the Past’, The Journal of Philosophy, 100, 5–53.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Frege, G.: 1892, ‘Uber Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, C, 25–50. English Translation in H. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds.), Readings in PhilosophicalAnalysis, New York 1949: Appleton-Century-Crofts, and also in M. Beaney (ed.), The Frege Reader, Blackwell, Oxford 1997, pp. 151–171.

  26. Gamut, L.T.F. (J. van Benthem, J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, M. Stokhof, and H. Verkuyl): 1991, Logic, Language and Meaning, vol. I: Introduction to Logic, vol. 2: Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gunson, D.: 1998, Michael Dummett and the Theory of Meaning, Ashgate PublishingCompany, Aldershot-Brookfield USA-Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Husserl, E.: 1900–1901, Logische Untersuchungen, vol. I, Halle 1900, vol. II, Halle 1901.

  29. Ingarden, R.: 1930, Das literarische Kunstwerk, Polish translation: O dziele literackim, PWN, Warszawa, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lambek, J.: 1958, ‘The Mathematics of Sentence Structure’, American Mathematical Monthly 65, 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lambek, J.: 1961, ‘On the Calculus of Syntactic Types’, in R. Jakobson (ed.), Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects I, AMS, Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Le' uge eines neuen Systems der Grudlagen der Mathesniewski, S.: 1929, ‘Grundzüatik’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 14, 1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Le' sniewski, S.: 1930, ‘Uber die Grundlagen der Ontologie’, Comptes rendus des sét' eances de la Socié des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, Classe III, 23, Warszawa, pp. 111–132.

  34. Marciszewski, W. (ed.): 1981, Dictionary of Logic as Applied in the Study of Language. Concepts/Methods/Theories. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague-Boston- London.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Marciszewski, W. (ed): 1987, Formal Logic (Logika Formalna. Zarys Encyklopedyczny z Zastosowaniami do Informatyki i Lingwistyki), PWN, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Marciszewski, W.: 1988, ‘A Chronicle of Categorial Grammar’, in W. Buszkowski, W. Marciszewski, and J. van Benthem (eds.), 7–22.

  37. Montague, R.: 1968, ‘Pragmatics’, in: R. Klibansky (ed.) Contemporary Philosophy: A survey, Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 102–122. Reprinted in R. Montague 1974.

  38. Montague, R.: 1970a, ‘Pragmatics and Intensional Logic’, Synthese 22, 68–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Montague, R.: 1970b, ‘English as a Formal Language’, in B. Visentini (ed.), Linguaggi nella societa e nella tecnica, Edizioni di Comunit a, Milano, pp. 189–224.

  40. Montague R.: 1970c, ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria 36, 373–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Montague, R.: 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers, in R.H. Thomason (ed. and introd.), Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peirce, S.Ch.: 1931–35, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, C. Hartshorne, and P. Meiss (eds.), vols. 1–5, Cambridge, Mass.

  43. Pelc, J.: 1971, Studies in Functional Logical Semiotics of Natural Languages, Janua Linguarum Series Minor 90, Mouton, The Hague-Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pelc, J.: 1979, ‘A Functional Approach to the Logical Semiotics of Natural Language’, in Semiotics in Poland 1894–1969, selected and edited with and introduction U. Wybraniec-Skardowska by J. Pelc, Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic and Methodology of Science, vol. 119, PWN/Reidel, Dortrecht-Boston, pp. 342–375.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Putnam, H.: 1975: ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning’’, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, VII, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Scott, D.: 1970, ‘Advice on Modal Logic’, in K. Lambert (ed.) Philosophical Problems in Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tarski, A.: 1933, Pojęcie Prawdy w Językach Nauk Dedukcyjnych, Warszawa: Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego. Englishtranslation: ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in Logic, Semantics, Metamatematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, Oxford 1956.

  48. Tokarz, M.: 1993, Elementylogiki pragmatycznej (Elements of Logical Pragmatics), Logika i Zastosowania Logiki, PWN, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 1981, ‘On the Theory of Label-tokens’, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, Polish Academy of Sciences, vol. 10, no.1, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 1985, Teorie jezyk' ow syntaktycznie kategorialnych (Theories of Syntactic-Categorial Languages), PWN, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 1989, ‘On the Eliminatibility of Ideal Linguistic Entities’, Studia Logica 48, no. 4, 587–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 1991, Theory of Language Syntax. Categorial Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht -Boston -London.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 1998, ‘Logical and Philosophical Ideas in Certain Approaches to Language’, Synthese 116, 231–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 2001, ‘On Denotation of Quantifiers’, in M. Omyla (ed.), Logical Ideas of Roman Suszko, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology of Warsaw University, Warszawa, pp. 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 2005, ‘O pojęciachsensu z perspektywylogiki’(‘On the Notions of Sense from a Logical Perspective’), in Ratione et Studio, University of Biaãlystok, Biaãlystok, 155–190.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wybraniec-Skardowska, U.: 2007, ‘Three Principles of Compositionality’, Cognitive Science and Media in Education, vol. 8 (to appear).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska.

Additional information

Presented by Wojciech Buszkowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. Meaning and Interpretation. I . Stud Logica 85, 105–132 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9026-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9026-0

Keywords

Navigation