Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

3D-QSAR, CoMFA, and CoMSIA of new phenyloxazolidinones derivatives as potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Structural Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a fundamental factor in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) therapy, it has been shown that HIV-1 protease inhibitors to be an important in restraining HIV-1. In the present study, the three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship (3D-QSAR) modeling was conducted on a series of phenyloxazolidinone derivatives. The comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA), performed on the training set of 51 compounds, and the optimum PLS model on CoMFA/CoMSIA descriptors showed “leave-one-out” cross-validation correlation coefficients (Q 2) of 0.772 and 0.720 as well as the non-cross-validated correlation coefficients (R 2ncv ) of 0.966 and 0.963, respectively. Furthermore, the satisfactory results, based on the bootstrapping analysis and tenfold cross-validation, suggest the highly statistical significance of the optimal model. The statistical parameters from the models indicate that the data are well fitted and have high predictive ability. Moreover, the resulting 3D CoMFA/CoMSIA contour maps provide useful guidance for designing highly active inhibitors. The external predictive capability of the established model was evaluated by an external test set of 16 compounds, resulting in the predicted correlation coefficients (R 2pred ) of 0.9848 and 0.9291, respectively. It is recommended that the bulky electron-donating substituents at the regions A and D can increase the biological activities of the inhibitors. It is expected that the developed model could provide some useful information for the future synthesis of highly potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. www.unaids.org. Accessed 3 February 2012

  2. http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/news64/. Accessed 3 February 2012

  3. Berger EA, Murphy PM, Farber JM (1999) Chemokine receptors as HIV-1 coreceptors: roles in viral entry, tropism, and disease. Annu Rev Immunol 17:657–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandres JC, Wang QF, O’Leary J, Baleaux F, Amara A, Hoxie JA, Zolla-Pazner S, Gorny MK (1998) Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope binds to CXCR4 independently of CD4, and binding can be enhanced by interaction with soluble CD4 or by HIV envelope deglycosylation. J Virol 72:2500–2504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lapatto R, Blundell T, Hemmings A, Overington J, Wood S, Wilderspin A, Merson JR, Whittle PJ, Danley DE, Geoghegan KF, Hawrylik SJ, Lee SE, Scheld KG, Hobart PM (1989) X-ray analysis of HIV-1 proteinase at 2.7 Å resolution confirms structural homology among retroviral enzymes. Nature 342:299–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kramer RA, Schaber MD, Skalka AM, Ganguly K, Wong-Staal F, Reddy EP (1986) HTLV-III gag protein is processed in yeast cells by the virus pol-protease. Science 231:1580–1585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boggetto N, Reboud-Ravaux M (2002) Dimerization inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Biol Chem 383:1321–1324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. TanJ J, Cong XJ, Hu LM, Wang CX, Jia L, Lian XJ (2010) Therapeutic strategies underpinning the development of novel techniques for the treatment of HIV infection. Drug Discov Today 15:186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali A, Reddy GSKK, Cao H, Anjum SG, Nalam MNL (2010) Structure-based design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationship studies of HIV-1 protease inhibitors incorporating phenyloxazolidinones. J Med Chem 53:7699–7708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reddy GSKK, Ali A, Nalam MNL, Anjum SG, Cao H, Nathans RS, Schiffer CA, Rana TM (2007) Design and synthesis of HIV-1 protease inhibitors incorporating oxazolidinones as P2/P2 Ligands in pseudosymmetric dipeptide isosteres. J Med Chem 50:4316–4328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Richard D, David E, Jeffrey D (1988) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc 110:5959–5967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T (1994) Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J Med Chem 37:4130–4146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Golbraikh A, Shen M, Xiao ZY, Xiao YD, Lee KH, Tropsha A (2003) Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:241–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemmateenejad B, Javadnia K, Elyasi M (2007) Quantitative structure-retention relationship for the Kovats retention indices of a large set of terpenes: a combined data splitting-feature selection strategy. Anal Chim Acta 592:72–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. HCA™ Manual, SYBYL 7.3 (2006). Tripos, St. Louis

  16. Pirhadi S, Ghasemi JB (2010) 3D-QSAR analysis of human immunodeficiency virus entry-1 inhibitors by CoMFA and CoMSIA. Eur J Med Chem 45:4897–4903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoyanov K, Walmsley AD (2006) Classification and pattern recognition. In: Gemperline PJ (ed) Practical guide to chemometrics. CRC-Taylor and Francis, Oxford, pp 347–351

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clark M, Cramer RD, Opdenbosch NV (1989) Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 forcefield. J Comput Chem 10:982–1012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Folkers G, Merz A, Rognan D (1993) In: Kubinyi H (ed) 3D-QSAR in drug design, theory, methods and applications. Leiden, ESCOM, pp 583–618

    Google Scholar 

  20. Viswanadhan VN, Ghose AK, Revankar GR, Robins RK (1989) Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure–activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 29:163–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamath S, Buolamwini JK (2003) Receptor-guided alignment-based comparative 3D-QSAR studies of benzylidene malonitriletyrphostins as EGFR and HER-2 kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 46:4657–4668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bohm M, Sturzebecher J, Klebe G (1999) Three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship analyses using comparative molecular field analysis and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis to elucidate selectivity differences of inhibitors binding to trypsin, thrombin, and factor Xa. J Med Chem 42:458–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wold S, Rhue A, Wold H, Dunn W III (1984) The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses. SIAMJ Sci Stat Comput 5:735–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Clark M, Cramer RD III (1993) The probability of chance correlation using partial least squares (PLS). Quant Struct Act Relat 12:137–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. BushBL Nachbar RB (1993) Sample-distance partial least squares: pLS optimized for manyvariables, with application to CoMFA. J Comput Aided Mol Des 7:587–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cramer RD III, Bunce JD, Patterson DE (1998) Crossvalidation, bootstrapping, and partial least squares compared with multipleregression in conventional QSAR studies. Quant Struct Act Relat 7:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wold S (1978) Cross-validation estimation of the number of components in factor and principal components models. Technometrics 20:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) Beware of q2! J Mol Graphics Model 20:269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mao Y, Li Y, Hao M, Zhang S, Ai C (2011) Docking, molecular dynamics and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies for HEPTs and DABOs as HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors. J Mol Model. doi:10.1007/s00894-011-1236-1238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jahan B. Ghasemi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11224_2012_92_MOESM1_ESM.doc

Supplementary material 1: The actual and predicted activity values based on the optimal CoMFA and CoMSIA models for CoMFA/CoMSIA train and test set presented in supplementary tables (DOC 135 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abedi, H., Ebrahimzadeh, H. & Ghasemi, J.B. 3D-QSAR, CoMFA, and CoMSIA of new phenyloxazolidinones derivatives as potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Struct Chem 24, 433–444 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-012-0092-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-012-0092-1

Keywords

Navigation