Skip to main content
Log in

Academic performance differences among ethnic groups: do the daily use and management of time offer explanations?

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This explorative study describes time use and time management behaviour of ethnic minority and ethnic majority students as possible explanations for the poorer study results of ethnic minority students compared to those of majority students. We used a diary approach in a small sample to examine students’ daily time use in both a lecture week and an exam week. Time management behaviour was measured in a questionnaire, as were demographic variables. The sample consisted of 48 full-time first-year university students of Business Administration of which 24 students belonged to a non-Western ethnic minority group. Student pairs (ethnic majority vs. non-Western ethnic minority) were fully matched by gender, socio-economic status, living situation and type of secondary education. Results showed that ethnic majority students earned higher grades compared to ethnic minority students. As regards time management behaviour, ethnic majority students appeared to have a stronger preference for organisation (e.g., leaving a clear study space at the end of a study day) than ethnic minority students. No differences between ethnic groups were revealed in setting goals and priorities (e.g., setting deadlines) and mechanics of time management (e.g., making to-do lists). Daily time use also appeared to be the same for both ethnic groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the Netherlands, students have access to university education after completing pre-university education (i.e., a VWO degree), after successfully completing the first year in higher vocational education or the bachelor in higher vocational education, and after obtaining a colloquium doctum.

References

  • Bennett, R. (2003). Determinants of undergraduate student drop out rates in a university business studies department. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27, 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S., & Cantwell, A. M. (2008). Undergraduate time use and academic outcomes: Results from UCUES 2006. Research and Occasional Papers: CSHE, 14(08), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. B. (2007). Job characteristics and college performance and attitudes: A model of work-school conflict and facilitation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 500–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, H. P. H. (2007). Psychological well-being and scholastic achievement among university students in a Canadian prairie city. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 483–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derous, E., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). When earning is beneficial for learning: The relation of employment and leisure activities to academic outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., McCall, B. P., Ott, M., & Kim, J. (2010). A quasi-experimental investigation of how the gates millennium scholars program is related to college students’ time use and activities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 456–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O. D., & Navarro, L. (2003). The effective use of student time: A stochastic frontier production function case study. Economics of Education Review, 22, 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimers, M. T., & Pike, G. R. (1997). Minority and non-minority adjustment to college: Differences or similarities. Research in Higher Education, 38, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. A., Connolly, B. A., & Snyder, T. D. (2005). Youth indicators 2005: Trends in the well-being of American youth (NCES Publication No. 2005–050). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Fuligni, A. J., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Time use and mathematics achievement among American, Chinese and Japanese high school students. Child Development, 66(3), 830–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., Dixon, S., Stansal, E., Gelb, S., & Pheri, T. (2008). Time diary and questionnaire assessment of factors associated with academic and personal success among university undergraduates. Journal of American College Health, 56, 706–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson-Horton, L. D., & Owens, L. (2004). From freshman to graduate: Recruiting and retaining minority students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3, 86–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, W. H. A., & Van den Berg, M. N. (2003). Ethnic-specific achievements in Dutch higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 28, 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolari, S., Savander-Ranne, C., & Viskari, E.-L. (2008). Learning needs time and effort: A time-use study of engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohfink, M., & Paulsen, M. (2005). Comparing the determinants of persistence for first-generation and continuing-generation students. Journal of College Student Developement, 46, 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Philips, A. P. (1990). College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760– 768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. H. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, G., Howard, J., & King, D. (1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 410–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuwisse, M., & Severiens, S. E. (2010). Learning environment, interaction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51, 528–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S. A., Philhours, M. L., & Hudson, G. I. (2006). Where does the time go? A diary approach to business and marketing students’ time use. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. (2006). Academic performance of college students: Influence of time spent studying and working. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggert, S., Boyle, M., Petrosko, J., Ash, D., & Rude-Parkins, C. (2006). Student employment and higher education: Empiricism and contradiction. Review of Educational Research, 76, 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severiens, S. E., & Wolff, R. (2008). A comparison of ethnic minority and majority students: Social and academic integration, and quality of learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Netherlands. (2011). Retrieved on August, 2011, from http://www.statline.cbs.nl/.

  • Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2004). Time-use and college outcomes. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanum, S., & Bigatti, S. (2006). The influences of course effort and outside activities on grades in a college course. Journal of College Student Developement, 47, 564–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swail, W. S., Redd, K. E., & Perna, L. W. (2003). Retaining minority students in higher education: A framework for success. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30, 1–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary institutions: 1999–2000 (NCES Publication No. 2002–168). Washington, D.C.

  • Van den Berg, M. N., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2005). Student success in university education: A multi-measurement study of the impact of student and faculty factors on study progress. Higher Education, 50, 413–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wha Kim, C., & Dembo, M. H. (2000). Social cognitive factors influencing success on college entrance exams in South Korea. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, C., & Jones, M. (1994). Academic benefits of on campus employment to first year developmental education students. Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 6, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkow, M. R. (2009). Academic achievement and adolescents’ daily time use in the social and academic domains. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marieke Meeuwisse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meeuwisse, M., Born, M.P. & Severiens, S.E. Academic performance differences among ethnic groups: do the daily use and management of time offer explanations?. Soc Psychol Educ 16, 599–615 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9231-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9231-9

Keywords

Navigation