Abstract
A major source of oppression in industrial and post-industrial society is the restrictive and highly authoritarian nature of the workplace. One response is to democratize the workplace by increasing the participation of workers in making decisions and in choosing and evaluating managers as well as sharing in the ownership of the firm. These are not new ideas, and there are many examples of organizations pursuing various forms of democratic practices. However, a major objection is that such participation would compromise economic and other types of organizational productivity. This article examines the empirical support for that argument over a wide range of types of organizations in which workers participate in important decisions affecting their welfare. The overall results of this survey across many different forms of work organization suggest that the evidence supports the opposite conclusion, that worker participation increases productivity, particularly when workers share the benefits of higher productivity. The challenge is to ascertain ways of spreading these practices more widely.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchian, A., and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production information costs, and economic organization. Am. Econ. Rev. 62: 777–795.
Almond, G., and Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Bachrach, P., and Botwinick, A. (1992). A Radical Theory of Participatory Democracy, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Batt, R., and Appelbaum, E. (1995). Worker participation in diverse settings: Does the form affect the outcome, and if so, who benefits? Br. J. Ind. Relat. 33: 353–378.
Berman, K. (1967). Worker-Owned Plywood Companies: An Economic Analysis, Washington State University Press, Pullman, WA.
Bloom, H. S., Ham, S., Melton, L., and O’Brien, J. (2001). Evaluating the Accelerated Schools Approach, Manpower Development Research Corporation, New York. www.mdrc.org.
Bonin, J., and Putterman, L. (2002). Economics of Cooperation and the Labor-Managed Economy, Routledge, New York.
Brooke, P. P., and Price, J. L. (1989). The determinants of employee absenteeism: An empirical test of a causal model. J. Occup. Psychol. 62: 1–19.
Brown, C., and Reich, M. (1989). When does union-management cooperation work? A look at NUMMI and GM-Van Nuys. Calif. Manage. Rev. 31: 26–44.
Cappelli, P., and Neumark, D. (2001). Do “high performance” work practices improve establishment-level outcomes? Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 54: 737–775.
Carnoy, M., and Levin, H. M. (1985). Schooling and Work in the Democratic State, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Cohen, A. (2004). A community of ex-cons shows how to bring prisoners back into society. New York Times (January 2).
Cole, G. D. H. (1920). Social Theory, Methuen, London.
Conte, M. A., and Svejnar, J. (1990). The performance effects of employee ownership plans. In Blinder, A. (ed.), Paying for Productivity, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
Dirkswager, E. J. (ed.), (2002). Teachers as Owners, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD.
Donahue, A. K. (2004). The influence of management on the cost of fire protection. J. Pol. Anal. Manage. 23: 71–92.
Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C., and Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 72: 463–483.
Fromm, E. (1968). The Revolution of Hope, Harper & Row, New York.
Greenberg, E. S. (1984). Producer cooperatives and democratic theory: The case of the plywood firms. In Jackall, R., and Levin, H. M. (eds.), Worker Cooperatives in America, pp. 171–214.
Greenberg, E. S., Grunberg, L., and Daniel, K. (1996). Industrial work and political participation: Beyond simple spillover. Pol. Res. Quart. 49: 305–330.
Hopfenberg, W., Levin, H. M., Chase, C., Christensen, G., Moore, M., Soler, P., Brunner, I., Keller, B., and Rodriguez, G. (1992). The Accelerated Schools Resource Guide, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Jackall, R., and Levin, H. M. (eds.), (1984). Worker Cooperatives in America, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Jones, D. C. (1984). American producer cooperatives and employee-owned firms: A historical perspective. In Jackall, R., and Levin, H. M. (eds.), Worker Cooperatives in America, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. pp. 37–56.
Jones, D. C., and Schneider, D. J. (1984). Self-help producer cooperatives: Government-administered cooperatives during the depression. In Jackall, R., and Levin, H. M. (eds.), Worker Cooperatives in America, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. pp. 57–84.
Kim, S. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Adm. Rev. 62: 231–241.
Levin, H. M. (1984). Employment and productivity of producer cooperatives. In Jackall, R., and Levin, H. M. (eds.), Worker Cooperatives in America, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. pp. 26–31.
Levine, D. (1995). Reinventing the workplace, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
MacDuffie, J. P., and Krafcik, J. (1992). Integrating technology and human resources for high-performance manufacturing: Evidence from the international auto industry. In Useem, M. (ed.), Transforming Organizations, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 209–226.
Martin, T. H. (2000). The impact of worker ownership on Firm-Level performance: A comparative study, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Economics, Yale University, UMI Number 9973734, UMI, Ann Arbor, MI.
McCue, C. P., and Gianakis, G. A. (1997). The relationship between job satisfaction and performance: The case of local government finance officers in Ohio. Public Productivity and Manage. Rev. 21, 170–191.
Miller, K. I., and Monge, P. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Manage. J. 29: 727–753.
Nalbantian, H. R. (1987). Incentives, Cooperation, and Risk Sharing: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Employment Contracts, Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ.
National Center for Employee Ownership (2004). Employee Ownership and Corporate Performance. Downloaded January 24, 2004. http://www.nceo.org/library/corpperf.html.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Pencavel, J. (2001). Worker Participation: Lessons from the Worker Co-ops of the Pacific Northwest, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., and Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual performance. Acad. Manage. Rev. 9: 712–721.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Simon Schuster, New York.
Ross, S., Wang, S. W., Sanders, W., Wright, S. P., and Stringfield, S. (1999). Two and Three-Year Achievement Results on the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System for Restructure Schools in Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis, Memphis.
Rothenberg, S. (2003). Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. J. Manage. Stud. 40: 1783–1802.
Schur, L. (2003). Employment and the creation of an active citizenry. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 42: 751–777.
Smith, A. (1937). The Wealth of Nations, Random House, New York.
Thomas, H. T., and Logan, C. (1982). Mondragon: An Economic Analysis, George Allen & Unwin, Boston.
Stiglitz, J. (1975). Incentives, risk and information: Notes toward a theory of hierarchy. Bell J. Econ. 6: 553–579.
Weber, M. (1964). On bureaucracy. In Gerth, H., and Mills, C. W. (eds.), Max Weber, Oxford University Press. New York, pp. 196–244.
Weitzman, M., and Kruse, K. (1990). Profit sharing and productivity. In Blinder, A. (ed.), Paying for Productivity, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
Whyte, W. F., and Whyte, K. K. (1991). Making Mondragon: The Growth and Dynamics of the Worker Cooperative Complex, 2nd edn. Rev., ILR Press, Ithaca, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levin, H.M. Worker Democracy and Worker Productivity. Soc Just Res 19, 109–121 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0002-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0002-z