Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Well-being Among Legal and Illegal Immigrants: Evidence from South Italy

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pursuit of happiness and life satisfaction mobilises individuals to create a dynamic, unique, everyday reality for themselves. The literature has placed particular emphasis on the study of immigrants on the basis that migration is triggered by discrepancies between prior expectations and realisations post-migration. However, the relationship between happiness and illegal migration has received little attention. This study contributes to the current literature by analysing a sample of both illegal and legal immigrants to test the established socio-economic drivers of well-being for each group. Additionally, for the first time, the subjective well-being (SWB) of the respondents is measured in a continuous scale utilising the Visual Analogue Scale technique. Our findings demonstrate that illegal immigrants not only experience greater increases in SWB, but they also report higher levels. Finally, the income effect is positively correlated (although weak) with SWB for illegal immigrants only and family size is positively correlated with greater levels of SWB for their legal counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper life satisfaction, happiness and subjective well-being will be used interchangeably, although we acknowledge that there are qualitative differences between these terms (Kim-Prieto et al. 2005).

  2. In Italy, immigrants represent 8 % of the total population (Eurispes 2013).

  3. The presence of linguistic mediators ensures that the questionnaires were filled correctly.

  4. Illegal immigrants are entitled to, in public or private hospitals, all outpatient treatment and hospital care urgent or essential for illness and injury, as well as preventive medicine.

  5. The IFO Institute is the Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

  6. There are many ways in which VAS have been presented, including horizontal lines. Wewers and Lowe (1990) provide an informative discussion of the benefits and shortcomings for different styles of VAS. The advantage of the vertical line over the horizontal one is that it avoids confusion for people that are used to write from right to left.

  7. Our dependent variable records subjective well-being and spans from −70 to 100. The negative values consist only 1.8 % of the sample and they have been re-coded as zero. An alternative approach is to drop the negative observations from the sample. The results are robust with the latter approach.

  8. This problem arises when comparing immigrants to natives.

  9. This is explained by the relative deprivation model of Stark and Taylor (1991).

  10. The calculation of relative income differs from that of Ball and Chernova (2008) who consider the absolute income of other people in the country, implicitly comparing immigrants to natives.

  11. Additional regressions substituting the absolute income with the relative income have been performed. However, the model estimates were identical for the two regressions and therefore are not presented in the paper.

  12. The argument is based on maximising the individual’s net benefit (Todaro 1976; Sjaastad 1962).

  13. The Appendix presents the distribution of schooling across legal status, as well as the distributions of other factor variables.

  14. Regarding the variable Family Size Italy, we decided to merge the “1 to 3 relatives” and “more than 3 relatives” categories because the latter consisted a very small percentage in the sample.

  15. Additionally Fig. 13 (found in the Appendix) shows that illegal immigrants weakly dominate the changes in SWB, meaning that illegal immigrants are better off relative to their legal counterparts. However, it has to be made clear that although this is the impression that one gets by looking the distribution of Fig. 13, the graph is not conclusive as the two lines overlap several times.

  16. We have conducted a two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for the equality of the distributions and we find that the two distributions significantly differ above the median.

  17. This variable is equivalent to the \(\Delta (Age)_{i}\) variable.

  18. Table V shows for which variables the differences are statistically significant and towards which group.

  19. There is no U-shaped pattern for age in our regressions. When age squared enters the regressions both age and age squared variables are insignificant. The answer to this can be found by going back to the data. Figure 12 in the Appendix shows that our sample is skewed towards young ages. Therefore, we are only able to verify the downward sloping part of the U-shaped pattern the age variable normally presents. A uniform distribution would possibly verify the U-shaped pattern.

  20. This variable is measured with error since we only hold actual information about the family size after the individual migrates rather than before. During the immigrant's stay abroad, their family has most probably migrated as well and therefore this variable is likely to be downward biased. However, all we are interested in is the sign rather than the magnitude and this is most probably not affected as long as all three bands of the variable are equally downward biased.

  21. We have tested for the equality of the distributions using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The results are presented in Table 12 in the Appendix.

  22. To create the matched sample we identified which characteristics are correlated with the probability of being legal using a Probit model and then we used a nearest neighbour matching algorithm, with at least two nearest neighbours.

  23. To test for the existence of such a bias one would need a counterfactual group. However, since the respondents were explicitly asked to report the level of their life satisfaction in general we expect that the extent of bias is somewhat restricted.

References

  • Ahuvia, A. (2008). If money doesn’t make us happy, why do we act as if it does? Journal of Economic Psycology, 29(4), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akay, A., Constant, A., & Giuletti, C. (2014). The impact of immigration on the well-being of natives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, 72–92.

  • Alesina, A., Di Tella R., & Macculloch R. (2000). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Cambridge, MA, NBER. Working paper, no. 8198.

  • Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2010). The power of the family. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 93–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, K. (2010). Determinants of life satisfaction among immigrants from Western countries and from the FSU in Israel. Social Indicators Research, 96(3), 515–534.

  • Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Foundations of hedonic psycology: Scientific perspectives on enjoyment and suffering (pp. 353–373). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R., & Chernova, K. (2008). Absolute income, relative income and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, D. (2011). economic migration and happiness: comparing immigrants’ and natives’ gains from income. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basilio, L., & Bauer, T. (2010). Tranferability of human capital and immigrant assimilation: An anaysis for Germany. IZA Discussion papers 4716.

  • Becker, S. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income. Ann-Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, William & Simpson, Nicole B., 2013. “The effects of international migration on the well-being of native populations in Europe”. IZA Discussion papers 7368, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflwer, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnke, P. (2008). Are the poor socially integrated? The link between poverty and social support in different welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1987). Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. American Economic Review, 77, 531–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1989). Economic theory and international migration. International Migration Review, 23(3), 457–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1994). The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(4), 1667–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, S., & Duarte, C. (2013). Mind the GAP! The relative wages of immigrants in the portuguese lanour market. Working paper no 5.

  • Caporale, G., Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N., & Yin, Y. (2009). Income and hapiness across Europe: Do reference values matter? Journal of Economic Psycology, 30(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. (2000). Are immigrants favorably self-selected? An economic analysis. In C. D. Brettell & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Migration Theory: Talking across disciplines (pp. 61–76). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiuri, E. (2002). Crisis in the countries of origin and illegal immigration into Italy. New York: Annual Meeting of the European Society for Population Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008a). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118(529), F222–F243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008b). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, X., Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. (2007). Explaining US immigration, 1971–1998. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. F., Chamratrithirong, A., & Tran, Q.-G. (2002). For better, for worse: Life satisfaction consequences of migration. International Migration Review, 36(3), 838–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 335–341.

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Pscycological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psycology, 29(1), 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does empirical growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & W. Rederm (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R., & Angelescu, L. (2010). Happiness and growth the world over: Time series evidence on the happiness-income paradox. In H. Hinte & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), Happiness, growth and the life cycle. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (1999). Luxury Fever. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, K., & Stephan, G. (1996). A paper on unhappiness and unemployment in Germany. Economic Letters, 52(3), 325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited-growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., & Todaro, M. (1970). Mining, unemployment and development: A two sector analysis. American Economic Review, 60(1), 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, S. (2008). Migration networks and migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 585–605.

  • Helliwell, J. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective wellbeing. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions B, 359, 1435–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Pietro, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(3), 261–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (2000). Diminishing returns to income, companionship–and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 103–119.

  • Litwin, H. (2005). Correlates of successful aging: Are they universal? International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61(4), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 56, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrone, A. (2008). Poverty, dignity and forgotten skin care: Dermatology in the system of human mobile population. Dermatologic Clinics, 26(2), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (l998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rusting, C. L. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 330–350). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013), Guidelines on measuring subjective well-being.

  • Oswald, A. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polgreen, L. A., & Simpson, N. B. (2011). Happiness and international migration. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 819–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, A. A., Anis, A. H., & Marra, C. A. (2006). Do visual analogue scale (VAS) derived standard gamble (SG) utilities agree with Health Utilities Index utilities? A comparison of patient and community preferences for health status in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(1), 25.

  • Rodgers, J., & Rodgers, J. (1997). The economic impact of rural to urban migration in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 937–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safi, M. (2010). Immigrants’ life satisfaction in Europe: Between assimilation and discrimination. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandefur, G. D., & Scott, W. J. (1981). A dynamic analysis of migration: An assessment of the effects of age, family and career variables. Demography, 18(3), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayad, A. (2004). The suffering of the immigrant. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy, an inquiry into human satisfaction and consumer dissatisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. (1992). The joyless economy. The psychology of human satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L. (1962). The Cost and returns of human migration. Jourrnal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., & Taylor, E. J. (1991). Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1163–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. CESIFO working paper no. 2394.

  • Studer, R. & Winkelmann R. (2011), Does it matter how life satisfaction is measured?—Evidence from a randomized experiment. Working paper series/Department of Economics, University of Zurich.

  • Todaro, M. (1976). Internal Migration in Developing Countries: A survey. Geneva: International Labor Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohra, N., & Adair, J. (2000). Life satisfaction of Indian immigrants in Canada. Psycology and Developing Societies, 12(2), 109–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing and Health, 13, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2000). Nonzero: The logic of human destiny. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap, L. (1977). The attraction of cities: A review of the migration literature. Journal of Development Economics, 4(3), 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would particularly, like to thank Dr. Luciano Gualdieri, from ASL Napoli 1, for both making the data available and helping with the preparation of this paper. The authors would like to thank participants at the WISERD 2013, 4th Annual Conference, and at the “Svipuppo, Lavoro e Istituzioni” 2014, workshop for they helpful suggestions. Many thanks also to Michalis Drouvelis, Marco Musella, Stephen Drinkwater and Catherine Robinson for their useful comments on earlier versions of this paper. We would also like to thank three anonymous referees for their constructive feedback on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica D’Isanto.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 and Tables 10, 11 and 12.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Distribution of years of education. The educational bands are as follows: 0 “no education”, 1 “1–6 years”, 2 “7–12 years”, 3 “13–15 years”, 4 “16+ years”

Fig. 5
figure 5

Continental distribution. The Continent groups are as follows: 0 “Africa”, 1 “America”, 2 “Asia”, 3 “Europe”

Fig. 6
figure 6

Distribution of Health Status (Home). The Health status is a dummy variable that takes value 1 for those with a long-term illness and zero otherwise

Fig. 7
figure 7

Distribution of Health Status (Italy). The Health status is a dummy variable that takes value 1 for those with a long-term illness and zero otherwise

Fig. 8
figure 8

Distribution of family size (Home Country). The groups of relatives are as follows: 0 “no relatives”, 1 “1–3 kins”, 2 “More than 3 kins”

Fig. 9
figure 9

Distribution of family size (Italy). The groups of relatives are as follows: 0 “no relatives”, 1 “1–3 kins”, 2 “More than 3 kins”

Fig. 10
figure 10

Shares of employment status for the country of origin. The groups of employment are as follows: 0 “unemployed”, 1 “student”, 2 “employed”

Fig. 11
figure 11

Shares of employment status for the destination country. The groups of employment are as follows: 0 “unemployed”, 1 “student”, 2 “employed”

Fig. 12
figure 12

Distribution of the age in the sample

Fig. 13
figure 13

Cumulative distribution of the change of SWB by legal status

Table 10 Literature review, the effect of income on happiness
Table 11 Literature review, the effects of non-pecuniary determinants on happiness and SWB
Table 12 Two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for equality of distribution functions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Isanto, F., Fouskas, P. & Verde, M. Determinants of Well-being Among Legal and Illegal Immigrants: Evidence from South Italy. Soc Indic Res 126, 1109–1141 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0924-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0924-7

Keywords

Navigation