Abstract
Subjective indicators are often criticized since they are thought to be particularly affected by the phenomenon of adaptive preferences and social comparison. For social policy purposes, processes of downward adaptation in disadvantaged individuals are of particular importance, i.e., it is supposed that such people compare themselves with others who are in the same precarious situation or even worse off and, as a result, lower their expectations and adapt their aspirations and preferences to their material and financial constraints. Based on the 2006–2010 waves of the Swiss Household Panel study, this contribution examines whether, and to what degree, indicators of material deprivation, subjective poverty and subjective well-being are affected by such downward adaptations. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that the bias caused by adaptation processes varies considerably among different measures and that, although subjective indicators are indeed often affected by this phenomenon, there are also robust measures, notably Townsend’s deprivation measure, Halleröd’s proportional deprivation index and the subjective well-being measure of general life satisfaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boarini, R., & Mira d’Ercole, M. (2006). Measures of material deprivation in OECD Countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.
Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–305). New York: Academic Press.
Crettaz, E. (2011). Fighting working poverty in postindustrial economies: Causes trade-offs and policy solutions. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Crettaz, E. (2012). Social indicators and adaptive preferences: What is the impact of income poverty on indicators of material deprivation and on the minimum income question? Swiss Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 421–440.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Napa Scollon, C. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill. Revising the adaption theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 616(4), 305–314.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of moses abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Gazareth, P., & Suter, C. (2010). Privation et risque d’appauvrissement en Suisse, 1999-2007. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 36(2), 213–234.
Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96.
Halleröd, B. (1994). A new approach to the direct consensual measurement of poverty. Social Policy Research Centre discussion paper (Vol. 50).
Halleröd, B. (1995). The truly poor: Direct and indirect consensual measurement of poverty in Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy, 5(2), 111–129.
Halleröd, B. (2006). Sour grapes: Relative deprivation, adaptive preferences and the measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 35, 371–390.
Lucas, R. E., Clark, A., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaption and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.
Mack, J., & Lansley, S. (1985). Poor britain. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2007). On the multidimensionality of poverty and social exclusion. In J. Micklewright & S. P. Jenkins (Eds.), Poverty and inequality: New directions (pp. 146–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2010). Using non-monetary deprivation indicators to analyze poverty and social exclusion: Lessons from Europe? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(2), 305–325.
OECD. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sen, A. (1984). Resources, values and development. Oxford: Blackwell.
Slocum-Gori, S. L., Zumbo, B. D., Michalos, A. C., & Diener, E. (2009). A note on the dimensionality of quality of life scales: An illustration with the satisfaction with life Scale (SWLS). Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 489–496. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9303-y.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic Performance and social progress.
Suter, C., & Iglesias, K. (2005). Relative deprivation and well-being. In H. Kriesi, P. Farago, M. Kohli, & M. Zarin-Nejadan (Eds.), Contemporary Switzerland. Revisiting the special case (pp. 9–37). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Suter, C., & Paris, D. (2002). Ungleichheit und deprivation: Die schweiz im drei-länder-vergleich. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 28(2), 217–240.
Swiss Federal Statistical Office. (2012). Armut in der schweiz: konzepte, resultate und methoden. Ergebnisse auf der basis von SILC 2008 bis 2010. Neuchâtel: SFSO.
Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. London: Penguin.
Van Praag, B., Goedhart, T., & Kapteyn, A. (1980). The poverty line—A pilot survey in Europe. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(3), 461–465.
Acknowledgments
The research reported here was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant Number 100017_143320).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The ten regression models discussed in this article are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 corresponds to Fig. 1 above, while Table 2 corresponds to Fig. 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crettaz, E., Suter, C. The Impact of Adaptive Preferences on Subjective Indicators: An Analysis of Poverty Indicators. Soc Indic Res 114, 139–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0388-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0388-6