Abstract
Many women who accept the basic tenets of feminist ideology are reluctant to call themselves feminists, which is problematic because feminist self-identification is related to a variety of positive outcomes. The present research tests the idea that discrepancies between women’s self-view and feminist-view on the dimensions of competence and warmth are related to identification with feminism. This supposition is guided by the idea that a full understanding of why women have difficulty embracing feminism must take into account not only their view of feminists, but also whether women see themselves as different from feminists. Three online survey studies, which included 387, 288, and 116 adult U.S. women, demonstrate that perception of warmth identification with feminism was lower if women regard feminists as less warm than they see themselves. For perceptions of competence, the direction of this discrepancy was irrelevant: The more women see feminists as differently competent (i.e., higher or lower), the less they identify with feminists. Moreover, perceived discrepancy predicted identification with feminism even after controlling for women’s agreement with feminist values. Both endorsement of feminist values and perceived discrepancy are important in predicting identification with feminism and therefore practical interventions to maximize identification should target both of these components. For perceived discrepancy, interventions to reduce feminist-self discrepancies will likely be most effective if they target stereotypes of feminists as being cold.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768.
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi:10.1037/h0055756.
Backus, F. R., & Mahalik, J. R. (2011). The masculinity of mr. right: Feminist identity and heterosexual women’s ideal romantic partners. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 318–326. doi:10.1177/0361684310392357.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Zucker, A. N. (2007). Feminism between the sheets: Sexual attitudes among feminists, nonfeminists, and egalitarians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 157–163. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00349.x.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.
Berryman-Fink, C., & Verderber, K. S. (1985). Attributions of the term feminist: A factor analytic development of a measuring instrument. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 51–64. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00860.x.
Bettencourt, K. E. F., Vacha-Haase, T., & Byrne, Z. S. (2011). Older and younger adults’ attitudes toward feminism: The influence of religiosity, political orientation, gender, education, and family. Sex Roles, 64, 863–874. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9946-z.
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Wheeler, S. C. (2006). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 154–170. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.154.
Brown, L. S. (1986). Gender-role analysis: A neglected component of psychological assessment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 23, 243–248. doi:10.1037/h0085604.
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665.
Burn, S., Aboud, R., & Moyles, C. (2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42, 1081–1089. doi:10.1023/A:1007044802798.
Cowan, G., Mestlin, M., & Masek, J. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27, 321–330. doi:10.1007/BF00289942.
Cuddy, A. J. (2009). Just because I'm nice, don't assume I'm dumb. Harvard Business Review, 87, 24.
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.
Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Beninger, A. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73–98. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004.
Cuddy, A. J., Kohut, M., & Neffinger, J. (2013). Connect, then lead. Harvard Business Review, 91, 54–61.
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x.
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Implicit self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 153–175). New York: Guilford Press.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001.
Diekman, A. B., & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 369–383. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00312.x.
Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695–709. doi:10.1177/0011000085134013.
Duncan, L. E. (2010). Women's relationship to feminism: Effects of generation and feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 498–507. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01599.x.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735.
Eisele, H., & Stake, J. (2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 233–244. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00432.x.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617.
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U.
Etaugh, C. (1975). Biographical predictors of college students’attitudes toward women. Journal of College Student Personnel, 16, 273–276.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.
Fitz, C. C., Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2012). Not all nonlabelers are created equal: Distinguishing between quasi-feminists and neoliberals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 274–285. doi:10.1177/0361684312451098.
Fortune. (2010, April 22). Fortune 500 women CEOs. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2010/fortune/1004/gallery.fortune500_women_ceos.fortune/index.html.
Gawronski, B., Strack, F., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2009). Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 86–117). New York: Psychology Press.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing... Or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 353–363. doi:10.1177/0361684316634081.
Hampp, A. (2012, November 30). Katy Perry, Carly Rae Jepsen Speak About Success, Empowerment at Billboard Women in Music Ceremony. Billboard. Retrieved from http://www.billboard.com.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003.
Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462–479). New York: The Guilford Press.
Houvouras, S., & Scott Carter, J. (2008). The F word: College students’ definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23, 234–256. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00072.x.
Howell, J. L., Gaither, S. E., & Ratliff, K. A. (2015). Caught in the middle: Defensive responses to IAT feedback among whites, blacks and biracial black/whites. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 373–381. doi:10.1177/1948550614561127.
Hurt, M., Nelson, J., Turner, D., Haines, M., Ramsey, L., Erchull, M., & Liss, M. (2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57, 355–363. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9272-7.
Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899.
Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16.
Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 59–83. doi:10.1080/14792779343000022.
Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed., pp. 205–236). Westport: Greenwood Press.
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531. doi:10.2307/2095297.
Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Unkelbach, C., & Alves, H. (2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative–progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 675–709. doi:10.1037/pspa0000046.
League of European Research Universities. (2012, July). Women, research, and universities: Excellence without gender bias. Retrieved from www.leru.org.
Leaper, C., & Arias, D. (2011). College women’s feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 64, 475–490. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9936-1.
Lee, A. (2014). The story of a t-shirt. Retrieved from: http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/blog/story-t-shirt/.
Lippa, R. A. (2001). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity–femininity. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 168–207. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2307.
Liss, M., Hoffner, C., & Crawford, M. (2000). What do feminists believe? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 279–284. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00210.x.
Liss, M., O'Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124–133. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00014.
Lottes, I. L., & Kuriloff, P. J. (1992). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence, 27, 675–688. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1414577
Nelson, J., Liss, M., Erchull, M., Hurt, M., Ramsey, L., Turner, D., … Haines, M. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58, 721–728. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44.
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009.
Parent, M. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600. doi:10.1177/0011000012445176.
Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28, 177–193. doi:10.1177/014920630202800203.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.
Ramsey, L. R., Haines, M. E., Hurt, M. M., Nelson, J. A., Turner, D. L., Liss, M., … Erchull, M. J. (2007). Thinking of others: Feminist identification and the perception of others’ beliefs. Sex Roles, 56, 611–616. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9205-5.
Redford, L., Howell, J. L., Meijs, M. H. J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2016). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward feminist prototypes predict identification as feminist. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430216630193. Advance online publication.
Reid, A., & Purcell, N. (2004). Pathways to feminist identification. Sex Roles, 50, 759–769. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029095.40767.3c.
Robnett, R., Anderson, K., & Hunter, L. E. (2012). Predicting feminist identity: Associations between gender-traditional attitudes, feminist stereotyping, and ethnicity. Sex Roles, 67, 143–157. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0170-2.
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294. doi:10.1037/h0026086.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Rudman, L., & Phelan, J. (2007). The interpersonal power of feminism: Is feminism good for romantic relationships? Sex Roles, 57, 787–799. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9319-9.
Sanders, M. S., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2012). An examination of African Americans' stereotyped perceptions of fictional media characters. Howard Journal of Communications, 23, 17–39. doi:10.1080/10646175.2012.641869.
Saunders, K. J., & Kashubeck-West, S. (2006). The relations among feminist identity development, gender-role orientation, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 199–211. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00282.x.
Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44–53. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01021.x.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). Who likes competent women? Competence, sex-role congruence of interests, and subjects' attitudes toward women as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 197–213. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01272.x.
Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263–277. doi:10.1177/0146167203256690.
Suter, E., & Toller, P. (2006). Gender role and feminism revisited: A follow-up study. Sex Roles, 55, 135–146. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9065-4.
Szymanski, D. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51, 145–159. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65–93. doi:10.1177/053901847401300204.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tavris, C. (1973). Who likes women’s liberation—and why: The case of unliberated liberals. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 175–198. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00110.x.
The Economist. (2014, March 8). The glass-ceiling index. London: The Economist Newspaper Limited.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Oxford: Blackwell.
Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325. doi:10.1007/BF02766650.
Twenge, J. M., & Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 591–605. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00383.x.
United Nations. (2010). The world’s women 2010. Trends and statistics. Retrieved from http://www.unstats.un.org.
United States Department of Labor. (2010). Quick stats on women workers. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/.
Van Knippenberg, A., & Ellemers, N. (1990). Social identity and intergroup differentiation processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 137–169. doi:10.1080/14792779108401860.
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.
Vinnicombe, S., & Sealy, R. (2013). The Female FTSE Board Report 2013. Retrieved from http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/p19617/Knowledge-Interchange/Management-Themes/Leadership/Cranfield-On-Leadership/The-Female-FTSE-Board-Report-2013.
Vonk, R. (1996). Negativity and potency effects in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 851–865. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199611)26:6<851::AID-EJSP790>3.0.CO;2-9.
Vonk, R. (1999). Impression formation and impression management: Motives, traits, and likeability inferred from self-promoting and self-deprecating behavior. Social Cognition, 17, 390–412. doi:10.1521/soco.1999.17.4.390.
White, J. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Think women, think warm: Stereotype content activation in women with a salient gender identity, using a modified Stroop task. Sex Roles, 60, 247–260. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9526-z.
Williams, R., & Wittig, M. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885–904. doi:10.1007/BF02936345.
Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139–1147. doi:10.1002/ejsp.549.
Yoder, J., Perry, R., & Saal, E. (2007). What good is a feminist identity?: Women’s feminist identification and role expectations for intimate and sexual relationships. Sex Roles, 57, 365–372. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9269-2.
Yoder, J., Tobias, A., & Snell, A. (2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64, 9–18. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3.
Zanna, M. P., & Hamilton, D. L. (1972). Attribute dimensions and patterns of trait inferences. Psychonomic Science, 27, 353–354. doi:10.3758/BF03328989.
Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I'm not a feminist, but …”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 423–435. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x.
Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers. Journal of Personality, 78, 1895–1924. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x.
Acknowledgements
Data and experiment files will be made publicly available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/eavhc) upon manuscript acceptance. This research was supported by Project Implicit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meijs, M.H.J., Ratliff, K.A. & Lammers, J. The Discrepancy Between How Women See Themselves and Feminists Predicts Identification with Feminism. Sex Roles 77, 293–308 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0733-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0733-8