Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strategic management remains a recent field of research that is dynamic and changing with the global business economy. Given the sheer importance of research on this field of business management, this paper aims to conduct a co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research. We map the authors and the most relevant approaches as well as detailing the new theoretical perspectives to strategic management theory. The analysis conducted uses three multivariate statistical analysis techniques in addition to the co-citation matrix to shed light on these issues. By incorporating all the citations that are included in the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index, we analyze co-citation patterns of the strategic management field during the period 1971–2014 and identify six subfields (clusters) that constitute the intellectual structure and investigate their mutual relationships. The main findings of the factor analysis suggest that there is a clear division between strategic entrepreneurship and corporate entrepreneurship. In addition, the concept of strategic behavior affects most strategic management research as evidenced by the co-citation analysis. A debate of future directions on the strategic management literature is discussed, which highlights the importance of combining more of a strategic entrepreneurship perspective based on behavioral intentions to the emerging research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775. doi:10.1177/014920630102700609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148. doi:10.2307/256633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520. doi:10.1002/smj.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. (1964). Industrial Organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (2001a). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. doi:10.2307/259393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (2001b). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650. doi:10.1177/014920630102700602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(SI), 175–190. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. doi:10.1177/014920630102700601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D., & Elmes, M. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 429–452. doi:10.2307/259329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303. doi:10.2307/3069456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(SI), 7–19. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic—Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5–14. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science, 45(7), 1008–1024. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.1008.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, S. G., Varadarajan, P. R., & Fahy, J. (1993). Sustainable competitive advantage in-service industries—A conceptual-model and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 83–99. doi:10.2307/1252221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(SI), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773–795. doi:10.2307/259062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision-processes in high-velocity environments—4 cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835. doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H. (1990). Strategy changes: Possible worlds and actual minds. In J. W. Frederickson (Ed.), Perspectives on strategic management (pp. 9–37). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H., & Hurry, D. (1993). Strategy through the option lens—An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 760–782. doi:10.2307/258597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H., Singh, H., & Thomas, H. (2002). The domain of strategic management: History and evolution. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1983). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management—Insights from a process study. Management Science, 29(12), 1349–1364. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.12.1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(96)00003-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (1985). Redirecting Research in Business Policy and Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 6(1), 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (1991). Does strategy research need game theory? Strategic Management Journal, 12(winter), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. E. (1985). Three models of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10, 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and strcuture: Chapters in the history of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10(2), 119–133. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). Servperf versus servqual—Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125–131. doi:10.2307/1252256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121. doi:10.1002/smj.275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52. doi:10.2307/1251915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S., & Nedungadi, P. (1994). Managerial representations of competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 31–44. doi:10.2307/1252267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., & Bowen, D. E. (1994). Management theory and total quality—Improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–396. doi:10.2307/256784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. R. (2012). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 789–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. R. (1992). Toward a general-theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 69–83. doi:10.2307/1252133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1991). Thinking strategically: The Competitive edge in business, politics, and everyday life. New York and London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision-making in high-velocity environments—Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737–770. doi:10.2307/256337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes—Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110. doi:10.2307/2393701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(SI), 17–37. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams—Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538. doi:10.2307/256485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. doi:10.2307/259138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, J. W. (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision-processes—Extension, observations, future-directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 445–466. doi:10.2307/256039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, J. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1984). Strategic decision-processes—Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 399–423. doi:10.2307/255932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00217.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Mele, D. N. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71. doi:10.1023/b:busi.0000039399.90587.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (1999). Strategy and the business lanscape. Reading MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, F. W., Kaufman, S. P., & Walleck, A. S. (1980). Strategic management for competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, E., Barnes, B. R., & Mahmood, T. (2015). A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals. International business review, 25(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 567–586. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M. L. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127. doi:10.2307/2393810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 73–90. doi:10.1002/smj.4250151006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. doi:10.1002/smj.332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue—Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 479–491. doi:10.1002/smj.196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., & Tyler, B. B. (1991). Strategic decision-models—Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5), 327–351. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417–456. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00008-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00086-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557. doi:10.2307/2393737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. doi:10.2307/3069453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763. doi:10.2307/2667054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemison, D. B. (1981). The importance of an integrative approach to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 601–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams—The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60–84. doi:10.2307/256728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human-resource systems and sustained competitive advantage—A competence-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699–727. doi:10.2307/258742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. (1992). The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation—An empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13(8), 585–608. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. E., & Guth, W. D. (1965). Business policy: Text and cases. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(SI), 95–112. doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(00)00048-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387–401. doi:10.1002/smj.158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. C. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. American Economic Review, 29, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. C. (1949). The current status of the monopoly problem in the United States. Harvard Law Review, 62, 1265–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505. doi:10.2307/249630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Societey for Information Science, 41(6), 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Quarterly Anthologies. (2000). On Strategy, Business Journal of McKinsey & Company. June.

  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. C., Cardinal, L. B., & Glick, W. H. (1997). Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 189–204. doi:10.2307/257026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 519–543. doi:10.2307/256654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school—Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195. doi:10.1002/smj.4250110302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, R., Hambrick, D., & Chen, M.-J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 935–955. doi:10.1002/smj.615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146. doi:10.1002/smj.573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & Mcdougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). Researching Strategic Change. In A. M. Pettigrew (Ed.), The management of strategic change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish Knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy. Harverd Business Review (November–December), 74(6), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. C. (1992). Organizational alignment as competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 119–134. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage—A review and empirical-study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15–37. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1980). Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodriguez, A., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the “Strategic Mangement Journal”, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuters, T. (2008). Using bibliometrics: A guide to evaluating research performance with citation data (Retrieved). Retrieved from http://ipscience.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf.

  • Ring, P. S., & Vandeven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093. doi:10.1002/smj.274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 237–250. doi:10.1002/smj.153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saloner, G. (1991). Modeling, game theory, and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 12(winter), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision-making—A comparative-analysis of dialectical inquiry, devils advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 51–71. doi:10.2307/255859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk, C. R. (1984). Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 111–128. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, H. A. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Hapter & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129–149. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00108-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1958). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724–736. doi:10.2307/258041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Bibliometrics, Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106. (summer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1947). Scientific Management. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. doi:10.1002/smj.640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., & Pruett, M. (1993). Perspectives on Theory Building in Strategic Management. Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(SI), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N., & Subramaniam, M. (2002). Theorizing the future of strategy: Questions for shaping strategy research in the knowledge economy. In A. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, & H. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition—Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.3.280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1989). From critical resources to corporate strategy. Journal of General Management, 14(3), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & Grifith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy—An empirical-test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373–392. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship performance relationship—a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950. doi:10.2307/1556420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbaracki, M. J. (1998). The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 602–636. doi:10.2307/2393677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1994). Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics, 30, 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NECE-Research Unit, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal

    João José M. Ferreira

  2. Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Portugal and NECE Research Centre, UBI, Castelo Branco, Portugal

    Cristina I. Fernandes

  3. La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Vanessa Ratten

Authors
  1. João José M. Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina I. Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vanessa Ratten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Ratten.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Documents usedin results
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, J.J.M., Fernandes, C.I. & Ratten, V. A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research. Scientometrics 109, 1–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2008-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2008-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation