Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nanomaterials patenting in Brazil: some considerations for the national regulatory framework

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Progress on the development of nanotechnology has led to a number of initiatives which serve to normalize activities in this area. Among emerging technologies, nanotechnology is one of the most prominent, and it raises high expectations in a wide range of areas affecting daily life. The risks to human health, the pathways of exposure to nanomaterials, and occupational safety are recent issues which require more attention. The study was performed on nanopatents by collecting, processing and analyzing information extracted from specialized patent databases covering the period from 1991 to 2011, totalling 1,343 patents and representing 36 countries. These patents were classified by the International Patent Classification, using the methodology proposed in a study published by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, which resulted in six groups of patents, distributed as follows: nanomaterials (40.3 %), medicine and biotechnology (26.6 %), measurement and production (10 %), electronics (2.7 %), energy and the environment (2.2 %), and optical electronics (1 %). Around 17 % of the patents in question did not fall into the adopted classification. The aim of this paper is to analyze the main trends of patenting related to nanotechnology, its development and environmental implications. An additional goal is to assist policy-makers to adjust the regulatory framework on nanotechnology, and to make recommendations for governments, industry, and national organizations, on creating specific subsidies for regulatory framework in Brazil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allarakhia, M., & Walsh, S. (2012). Analyzing and organizing nanotechnology development: Application of the institutional analysis development framework to nanotechnology consortia. Technovation, 32(3–4), 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, A. M. S., Alencar, M. S. M., Silva, C. H., Nunes, J., & Mendes, F. M. L. (2012). Trends in nanotechnology patents applied to the health sector. Recent patents in nanotechnology, 6, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, M. (2004). World patent information—the first 25 years. World Patent Information, 26(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind, K., & Gauch, S. (2009). Research and standardisation in nanotechnology: Evidence from Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 320–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borm, P. J. A., Robbins, D., Haubold, S., Kuhlbusch, T., Fissan, H., Donaldson, K., et al. (2006). The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC. Particle and Fibre Toxicology,. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-3-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. (2005). Ministério do Planejamento. Plano Plurianual 2004–2007. http://www.planobrasil.gov.br/arquivos_down/plRevisao_Vol2.pdf. Accessed Feb 2, 2012.

  • Braun, T., Schubert, A., & Zsindely, S. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzea, C., Pacheco, I. I., & Robbie, K. (2007). Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases, 2(4), MR17–MR71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, N. M. (2006). Nanotechnology and the human future: Policy, ethics, and risk. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1093, 280–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamas, C. I. (2008). Nanotechnology intellectual property in Brazil: Preliminary research note. World Patent Information, 30(2), 146–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coatrieux, J. L., Bansard, J. Y., & Kerbaol, M. (2004). About the use of bibliometry for evaluation. Innovation and Technology in Biology and Medicine, 25(1), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdi, P., Makovi, K., Somogyvari, Z., Strandburg, K., Tobochnik, J., Volf, P., et al. (2012). Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network. Scientometrics. doi 10.1007/s11192-012-0796-4.

  • Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, M. F. M., & Filgueiras, C. A. L. (2008). Um panorama da nanotecnologia no Brasil (e seus macro-desafios). Química Nova, 31(8), 2205–2213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Shi, Y. (2012). Transnational citation, technological diversity and small world in global nanotechnology patenting. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0706-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, C., & Loh, H. T. (2010). Pattern-oriented associative rule-based patent classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2395–2404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igami, M., & Okazaki, T. (2007). Capturing Nanotechnology’s current state of development via analysis of patents. STI Working Paper 2007/4 Statistical Analysis of science, Technology and Industry, DSTI/DOC (2007) 4 – OCDE. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/9/38780655.pdf. Accessed Feb 5, 2011.

  • Jin, B., Teng, H. F., Shi, Y. J., & Qu, F. Z. (2007). Chinese patent mining based on sememe statistics and key-phrase extraction. Advanced Data Mining and Applications, 4632, 516–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, G. E., & Sylvester, D. J. (2006). Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(4), 714–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccomas, K. A., & Besley, J. C. (2011). Fairness and nanotechnology concern. Risk Analysis, 31(11), 1749–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcintyre, R. A. (2012). Common nano-materials and their use in real world applications. Science Progress, 95(Pt1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, E. S., Paterno, L. G., & Mattoso, L. H. C. (2006). Nanotecnologia. In N. Durán, L. H. C. Mattoso, & P. C. Morais (Eds.), Nanotecnologia: Introdução, Preparação, e Caracterização de Nanomateriais e Exemplos de Aplicação. Artliber: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42(2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Industrial Property. INPI (2011). http://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/downloads/informacao_tecnologica/pdf/N79_ALERTA_TECNOLGICO_NanoEletroquimico2_2011_2_semestre_.pdf. Accessed May 23, 2012.

  • Pareto, V. (1949). Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXIII, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paschoalino, M. P., Marcone, G. P. S., & Jardim, W. F. (2010). Os nanomateriais e a questão ambiental. Química Nova, 33(2), 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Cunningham, S. W. (2005). Tech mining: exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. United States, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rediguieri, C. F. (2009). Study on the development of nanotechnology in advanced countries and in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 45(2), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. K. R. (2009). Co-evolutionary scenarios: An application to prospecting futures of the responsible development of nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1222–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi-Bergmann, B. (2008). A nanotecnologia: Da saúde para além do determinismo tecnológico. Ciência e Cultura, 60(2), 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, M., Landoni, P., & Verganti, R. (2008). Designing foresight studies for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NST) future developments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(8), 1202–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sant’Anna, L. S., Alencar, M. S. M., & Ferreira, A. P. (2013). Patenteamento em Nanotecnologia no Brasil: Desenvolvimento, Potencialidades e Reflexões para o Meio Ambiente e a Saúde Humana. Química Nova, 36, 348–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santo, M. M., Coelho, G. M., Santos, D. M., & Filho, L. F. (2006). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 1013–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, J. (2005). Nanotechnology: global strategies, industry trends and applications. Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shindo, H. (2005). Nanotechnology standardization in Japan. Stand News, 33(7), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. I. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management, 43, 1216–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Notten, A., & Surpatean, A. (2012). Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: A keyword mining approach. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0856-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. W., Zeineldin, H., & Madnick, S. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of distributed generation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(3), 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanetti-Ramos, B. G., & Creczynski-Pasa, T. B. (2008). O desenvolvimento da nanotecnologia: cenário mundial e nacional de investimentos. Revista Brasileira de Farmácia, 89(2), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculdade de Direito, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20550-900, Brazil

    Leonardo da Silva Sant’Anna

  2. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (ICICT), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Av. Brasil, 4305, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21045-360, Brazil

    Maria Simone de Menezes Alencar

  3. Centro de Estudos da Saúde do Trabalhador e Ecologia Humana (CESTEH), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca (ENSP), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), R. Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21041-210, Brazil

    Aldo Pacheco Ferreira

Authors
  1. Leonardo da Silva Sant’Anna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Simone de Menezes Alencar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aldo Pacheco Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo da Silva Sant’Anna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sant’Anna, L.d.S., Alencar, M.S.d.M. & Ferreira, A.P. Nanomaterials patenting in Brazil: some considerations for the national regulatory framework. Scientometrics 100, 675–686 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1300-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1300-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation