Skip to main content
Log in

The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The journal set which provides a representation of nanoscience and nanotechnology at the interfaces among applied physics, chemistry, and the life sciences is developing rapidly because of the introduction of new journals. The relevant contributions of nations can be expected to change according to the representations of the relevant interfaces among journal sets. In the 2005 set the position of the USA decreased more than in the 2004-set, while the EU-27 gained in terms of its percentage of world share of citations. The tag “Y01N” which was newly added to the EU classification system for patents, allows for the visualization of national profiles of nanotechnology in terms of relevant patents and patent classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braun, T., Zsindely, S., Dióspatonyi, I., Zádor, E. (2007), Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics, 70(3): 651–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hullmann, A. (2006), Who is winning the global nanorace? Nature, 1(2): 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. (2004), The (scientific) wealth of nations. The Scientist, 18(18): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., Lau, C. G. Y. (2007), Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3): 565–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2007), “Betweenness centrality” as an indicator of the “interdisciplinarity” of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1303–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2008), Patent classifications as indicators of intellexctual organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S. (forthcoming), Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system Scientometrics, In press.

  • Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P. (2005), Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3): 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P. (2007), Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70(3): 693–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, R. D. (2008), Relations between national research investments inputs and publication outputs: application to the American Paradox. Scientometrics, 74(2): 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, R. D., Holdridge, G. M. (2004), The US-EU race for leadership of science and technology. Scientometrics, 60(3): 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, M., Veefkind, V., Verbandt, Y., Galan, E. M., Absalom, R., Förster, W. (2006), Mapping nanotechnology patents: The EPO approach. World Patent Information, 28: 204–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2006), The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1): 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loet Leydesdorff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leydesdorff, L. The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics 76, 159–167 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1889-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1889-3

Keywords

Navigation