Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Was government the solution or the problem? The role of the state in the history of American social policy

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article attempts to resolve a contradiction noted by Charles Tilly between my earlier writings on education and later writings on the welfare state. The earlier work on education was critical of governments’ role in constructing bureaucratic school systems that reinforced inequality; the later work on the welfare state argued for the extension of government social provision. This article shows how the contradiction poses a false dichotomy. It then uses history to show how assessments of governments’ role reflect the political context in which they are written but rest on consistent values and priorities. The article emphasizes, as well, the absence of a counter narrative to the political right’s assertion of government policy failure; the truncated and inappropriate use of “state” in much writing on public policies; and the need for historians of policy to develop means of assessing the success or failure of government policies and programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I developed these arguments in The Irony of Early School Reform: Educational Innovation in Mid-Nineteenth Century Massachusetts (2001) and Class, Bureaucracy, and Schools (1975). A key—and controversial—volume in this literature is Bowles and Gintis (1974).

  2. Perhaps the most important book making this argument was John E. Chubb and Terry M. Moe (1990).

  3. Schwarz (1984) offers a persuasive overview of government-driven successes in the 1960s and 1970s.

  4. Another prominent example is Sugrue (1996). For examples that lean more to the right, see Morris (1980) and Banfield (1970). A partial exception to this trend is emerging among historians of public housing who emphasize the early halcyon days of the projects. For a review of some of this literature, see Fairbanks (2008).

  5. See chapter 1 of Frugg (1999) on the legal basis of American cities.

  6. In The Price of Citizenship (2008), I discuss devolution throughout various branches of the American welfare state.

  7. Another book that shows how institutional structures shaped policy implementation is Robert C. Lieberman (1998).

  8. An outstanding collection illustrating the new political history is Jacobs et al. (2003).

  9. Steffes’s work will appear as the revision of her dissertation, “A New Education for a Modern Age: National Reform, State-building, and the Transformation of American Schooling, 1890–1933,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 2007.

  10. For instance, see Nelson (2005).

  11. I do not mean to imply that Skocpol would claim this outcome as the only measure of success. It is success according to the question she is posing.

  12. See Rosen (2009) on “democratic constiutionalism” as an emerging theory of law.

  13. I have developed the idea of a social policy dialectic in Reconstructing American Education (1987)

References

  • Amenta, E. (1988). Bold relief: Institutional politics and the origins of modern American social policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, E. C. (1970). The unheavenly city: The nature and future of our urban crisis. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, E. D. (1991). America’s welfare state: From Roosevelt to Reagan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1974). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center on Social Welfare Law and Policy. (1995). Summary of AFDC waiver activity since February 1993, Publication No. 169-2.

  • Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and American schools. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, M., & Swanstrom, T. (1994). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, R. K. (2008). Two cheers for public housing: the tenants’ view. Journal of Urban History, 34(2), 380–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frug, G. E. (1999). City making: Building communities without building walls. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. (1964). Compulsory Mis-education. New York: Horizon Press.

  • Gordon, C. (1994). New deals: Business, labor, and politics in America, 1920–1935. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (2003). Dead on arrival: The politics of health care in twentieth-century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (2008). Mapping decline: St. Louis and the fate of the American city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graubard, A. (1972). Free the children: Radical reform and the free school movement. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C. (1997). The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M., Novak, W. J., & Zelizer, J. E. (Eds.). (2003). The democratic experience: New directions in American political history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, H., & Lowe, R. (2000). Bureaucracy left and right: Thinking about the one best system. In L. Cuban & D. Shipps (Eds.), Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (1968). The irony of early school reform: Educational innovation in mid-nineteenth century Massachusetts. New York: Teachers College Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (1975). Class, bureaucracy, and schools (expanded ed.). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (1983). Poverty and policy in American history. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (1987). Reconstructing American education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (2006). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare (10th anniversary expanded ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (2008). The price of citizenship: Redefining America’s welfare state (expanded ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, I. (2005). When affirmative action was white: An untold history of racial inequality in twentieth-century America. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, R. C. (1998). Shifting the color line: Race and the American welfare state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinn, P. J. (2006). No child left behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965–2000. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, G. A. (2008). The problem of jobs: Liberalism, race, and deindustrialization in Philadelphia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. R. (1980). The cost of good intentions: New York City and the liberal experiment, 1960–1975. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. A. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A. R. (2005). The elusive ideal: Equal educational opportunity and the federal role in Boston’s public schools, 1950–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olasky, M. (1992). The tragedy of American compassion. Washington: Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkinson, H. J. (1968). The imperfect panacea: American faith in education, 1865–1955. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1971). Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed and how they fail. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (2009). What’s a Liberal Justice Now? In New York Times Magazine, May 31. [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/magazine/31court-t.html?scp=1&sq=%22democratic%20constitutionalism%22&st=cse] on “democratic constiutionalism” as an emerging theory of law.

  • Schwarz, J. E. (1984). America’s hidden success: A reassessment of public policy from Kennedy to Reagan. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros, G. (1998). The crisis of global capitalism: Open society endangered. New York: BBS/Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugrue, T. J. (1996). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, D. J. (2002). Dividing lines: The politics of immigration control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1996). What good is urban history? Journal of Urban History, 22(6), 702–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, M., Orloff, A. S., & Skocpol, T. (1988). The politics of social policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For a careful and astute reading of the first draft of this article, I am indebted to Daniel Amsterdam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael B. Katz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, M.B. Was government the solution or the problem? The role of the state in the history of American social policy. Theor Soc 39, 487–502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-010-9114-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-010-9114-4

Keywords

Navigation