Abstract
This study focused on the exemplification of cultural memory banking as an ethnographic tool to understand cultural practices relevant to science teaching and learning in a rural coastal village in a central island of the Philippine archipelago. Using the collaborative action ethnography as a research methodology, 10 prospective science teachers and a science teacher educator/doctoral candidate formed a research team and documented community funds of knowledge relevant to science teaching and learning through their participation in a Community Immersion course. The study employed the use of the cultural memory banking as a meditational tool to analyze, make sense of, and represent interview, focus-group discussion, and observation data, among others, for the development of culturally relevant science lessons. Originally used as an anthropological tool to preserve cultural knowledge associated with the cultivation of indigenous plant varieties, the cultural memory banking, as adapted in science education, was used, both as a data collection and analytic tool, to locate relevant science at the intersection of community life. The research team developed a cultural memory bank exemplar, “Ginamos: The Stinky Smell that Sells,” to highlight the learning experiences and meaning-making process of those involved in its development. Dilemmas and insights on the development and use of cultural memory banking were discussed with respect to issues of knowledge mining and mainstreaming of indigenous/local funds of knowledge, troubling the privileged position of Western-inspired nature of science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. (2001). Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180–188.
Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: a cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287.
Arends, R., & Winitzky, N. (1996). Program structures and learning to teach. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Bridging a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 526–556). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourse and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73.
Boog, B. (2003). The emancipatory character of action research, its history and the present state of the art. Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13(6), 426–438.
Brand, B., & Glasson, G. (2004). Crossing cultural borders into science teaching: early life experiences, racial and ethnic identities, and beliefs about diversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(2), 119–141.
Bryan, L., & Atwater, M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: a challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86(6), 821–839.
Constantino, R. & Constantino, L. (1975/1992). The Philippines: A past revisited. Quezon City, Philippines: Tala Publishing Services.
Cortazzi, M. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: Falmer.
Cortazzi, M. (2001). Narrative analysis in ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Loftland, & L. Loftland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 384–394). London: SAGE.
Cross, B. E. (1995). The case for culturally coherent curriculum. In J. A. Beane (Ed.), Toward a coherent curriculum (pp. 71–76). Alexandra: Association for Supervsion and Curriculum Development.
Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspectives in th research process. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Erickson, F. (2006). Studying side by side: collaborative action ethnography in educational research. In J. Spindler & L. Hammond (Eds.), Innovations in educational ethnography: Theory, methods, and results (pp. 235–258). Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 860–877.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 106–116.
Gonzalez, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Introduction: Theorizing practices. In N. Gonzalez, L. Luis, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 1–24). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research with rather than on people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 179–188). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491.
Lemke, J. L. (2002). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.
Matthews, L. E. (2003). Babies overboard! The complexities of incorporating culturally relevancy teaching into mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(1), 61–82.
Murray, F. B. (1996). Beyond the natural teaching: The case for professional education. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Bridging a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 526–556). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nazarea, V. (1998/2001). Cultural memory and biodiversity. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.
Nichols, S., & Tippins, D. (2005). Community-based science education leadership enacted in a Filipino barangay. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 81–96). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Nichols, S., Tippins, D., Morano, L., Bilbao, P., & Barcenal, T. (2006). Creating a community-based science education research: Narratives from a Filipino barangay. In G. Spindler (Ed.), Innovation in educational ethnography: Theory, methods, and results (pp. 345–377). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Northfield, J. (1998). Teacher educators and the practice of science teacher education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education: Part two (pp. 695–706). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23.
Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2000). Discovering Indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6–34.
Solomon, J. (2003). Home-school learning of science: the culture of homes, and pupils’ difficult border crossing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 219–233.
Spence, D. P. (1986). Narrative smoothing and clinical wisdom. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 211–232). New York: Praeger.
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Handa, V.C., Tippins, D.J. Cultural Memory Banking in Preservice Science Teacher Education. Res Sci Educ 42, 1201–1217 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9241-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9241-6